【摘要】：隨著3D打印技術(shù)的迅猛發(fā)展,“社會化大制作”時代的到來只是時間問題。然而,其低成本和高效率在給人們生產(chǎn)生活帶來巨大好處和便利的同時,也給現(xiàn)有專利制度帶來了新的挑戰(zhàn)。本文首先從3D打印過程中的各主體出發(fā),探討各類主體的行為是否涉及專利間接侵權(quán)的問題。鑒于國內(nèi)在專利法領(lǐng)域還沒有系統(tǒng)性的專利間接侵權(quán)制度的相關(guān)規(guī)則,因此本文將在借鑒美國專利間接侵權(quán)相關(guān)規(guī)定的基礎(chǔ)上,對構(gòu)建3D打印背景下專利間接侵權(quán)制度提出意見與建議。本文共分為四個部分進(jìn)行論述:第一部分闡述了專利直接侵權(quán)、專利間接侵權(quán)以及二者的關(guān)系問題,同時闡述3D打印專利間接侵權(quán)產(chǎn)生的原因。第二部分討論了3D打印過程中相關(guān)主體的行為及其特征,以及是否構(gòu)成專利侵權(quán)或者專利間接侵權(quán)的問題。第三部分第三部分主要分析了美國對專利間接侵權(quán)問題的規(guī)定,同時對3D打印背景下我國相關(guān)理論應(yīng)對之不足作出分析。第四部分為本文的主體部分,主要論述了3D打印背景下我國專利間接侵權(quán)需作出的回應(yīng),即我國對專利間接侵權(quán)應(yīng)采取何種立場,對構(gòu)建和完善我國特色的專利間接侵權(quán)制度應(yīng)采取哪些法律對策等。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of 3D printing technology, the arrival of socialized mass production is only a matter of time. However, its low cost and high efficiency not only bring great benefits and convenience to people's production and life, but also bring new challenges to the existing patent system. In this paper, starting from the main body of 3D printing process, this paper discusses whether the behavior of all kinds of subjects involves the indirect infringement of patent. In view of the lack of systematic rules of patent indirect infringement system in the field of patent law in China, this article will draw lessons from the relevant provisions of the United States on indirect patent infringement. Suggestions on the establishment of patent indirect infringement system under the background of 3D printing are put forward. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part expounds the direct infringement of patents, indirect infringement of patents and the relationship between them, and expounds the causes of indirect infringement of 3-D printing patents. The second part discusses the behavior and characteristics of the related subjects in the process of 3D printing, and whether it constitutes patent infringement or patent indirect infringement. The third part mainly analyzes the provisions of the United States on patent indirect infringement, and analyzes the shortcomings of the relevant theories in the context of 3D printing. The fourth part is the main part of this paper, which mainly discusses the response of our country's patent indirect infringement under the background of 3D printing, that is, what kind of position should our country take to the patent indirect infringement? What legal countermeasures should be taken to construct and perfect the patent indirect infringement system with Chinese characteristics?
【學(xué)位授予單位】：外交學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2018
【分類號】：D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 蔡元臻;;3D打印沖擊下專利間接侵權(quán)制度研究[J];科技與法律;2014年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 肖鳳珠;3D打印技術(shù)中的專利間接侵權(quán)制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2016年

2 陳亦雨;3D打印的專利間接侵權(quán)問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

3 康添雄;美國專利間接侵權(quán)研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：2463189