【摘要】：我國(guó)《民法總則》確立的民商合一立法模式是民法典編幕中達(dá)成的嚴(yán)格立法共識(shí),也是我國(guó)《民法總則》對(duì)世界民事立法的貢獻(xiàn),即確立了在德國(guó)潘德克吞體系下民商合一的立法新模式。就內(nèi)容而言,《民法總則》創(chuàng)新地規(guī)定了民商合一的基本原則,確立了獨(dú)特的商事主體體系,區(qū)分了商事主體自治的內(nèi)部行為與外部行為,確立了商事權(quán)利體系以及商事責(zé)任體系�！睹穹ǹ倓t》通過(guò)創(chuàng)設(shè)一系列商事規(guī)范有效實(shí)現(xiàn)了民商合一,從而避免了民商不分與兩者"合而不一"的立法困境,也有利于恰當(dāng)?shù)貙?shí)現(xiàn)商事法律規(guī)范的體系化。因此,《民法總則》所創(chuàng)立的民商合一基本范疇與基本范式是民法典各分編確定商事規(guī)則的基本起點(diǎn),也為其中民事規(guī)范與商事規(guī)范的具體適用關(guān)系提供了基本準(zhǔn)則,統(tǒng)一了彌補(bǔ)商事法律漏洞的適用模式。這是我國(guó)民法典走向獨(dú)立和趨于成熟的重要標(biāo)志。可以認(rèn)為,《民法總則》創(chuàng)立的民商合一立法模式是繼《民法通則》頒行之后最具革命性的創(chuàng)新。正是這些中國(guó)化、時(shí)代化的因素奠定了《民法總則》乃至即將出臺(tái)的民法典在世界民法典中的重要地位。《民法總則》凝聚的民商合一立法共識(shí)應(yīng)該在民法典分編中得以全面貫徹。
[Abstract]:The legislative mode of civil and commercial unity established by the General principles of Civil Law in China is the strict legislative consensus reached in the Civil Code, and is also the contribution of the General provisions of Civil Law to the civil legislation in the world. That is to say, it establishes a new legislative model of the unity of civil and commercial affairs under the German Panderkton system. As far as the content is concerned, the General provisions of Civil Law innovatively prescribe the basic principle of the unity of civil and commercial affairs, establish a unique system of commercial subjects, and distinguish between the internal and external acts of the autonomy of commercial subjects. It establishes the commercial rights system and the commercial liability system. By creating a series of commercial norms, the General principles of Civil Law has effectively realized the unity of civil and commercial affairs, thus avoiding the legislative dilemma of "inconsistency" between civil and commercial law. It is also beneficial to properly realize the systematization of commercial legal norms. Therefore, the basic category and paradigm of civil and commercial unity created by the General principles of Civil Law is the basic starting point for the determination of commercial rules in various sections of the Civil Code, and also provides the basic norms for the specific application relationship between civil norms and commercial norms. It unifies the applicable mode of making up the loopholes in commercial law. This is our civil code toward independence and tend to mature an important symbol. It can be concluded that the legislative model of civil and commercial unity founded by General principles of Civil Law is the most revolutionary innovation after the promulgation of General principles of Civil Law. It is these Sinicization, The factors of the times have established the important position of the General provisions of Civil Law and even the coming Civil Code in the Civil Code of the world, and the common understanding of the unification of civil and commercial law which congealed in the General provisions of the Civil Code should be carried out in the civil code in an all-round way.
【作者單位】： 中南大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家法治與法學(xué)理論研究項(xiàng)目課題“商法規(guī)范的獨(dú)特性與我國(guó)民法典編纂”(16SFB1006) “法治湖南2011協(xié)同中心”的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李永;;我國(guó)采取民商合一制度的理論依據(jù)[J];商;2012年21期

2 張加文;我國(guó)制定民法典應(yīng)堅(jiān)持民商合一[J];山西省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期

3 杜麗娜;論民商合一的立法模式[J];湖北省社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

4 余能斌;程淑娟;;我國(guó)“民商合一"立法借鑒的新選擇——由《俄羅斯聯(lián)邦民法典》引出的思考[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2006年01期

5 曹謙;;論我國(guó)立法的民商合一主義[J];改革與開(kāi)放;2010年16期

6 殷志剛;評(píng)民商合一[J];江南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年03期

7 白曉勇;;我國(guó)民商合一體制下的商法地位談[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)信息;2010年04期

8 孫繼梅;;民商合一體制下的商法地位[J];信陽(yáng)農(nóng)業(yè)高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

9 童列春;;民商合一前見(jiàn)與私法理論懸疑[J];武漢理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年04期

10 李珊;論我國(guó)商事立法的“民商合一”[J];廣西青年干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 郭珊珊;民商合一視角下民事權(quán)利體系的構(gòu)建[D];湖南大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2444505