城鎮(zhèn)化中宅基地置換補償問題研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-03-16 15:58
【摘要】：隨著中國城鎮(zhèn)化的不斷發(fā)展,城鎮(zhèn)化進程的不斷加快,各地為了適應城鎮(zhèn)化的發(fā)展,紛紛推行宅基地置換政策。宅基地置不僅關系國家建設、經(jīng)濟發(fā)展,同樣也是農(nóng)民根本利益所在。在各地宅基地置換進程中,侵犯失地農(nóng)民利益的現(xiàn)象也不乏出現(xiàn)。本文對我國現(xiàn)階段城鎮(zhèn)化中宅基地置換補償問題進行研究,不僅對宅基地置換補償法律制度的完善提供了一定的幫助,為宅基地置換實踐中的補償提供更多科學合理的依據(jù),同樣也為暢通失地農(nóng)民權利救濟渠道提供借鑒意義,使失地農(nóng)民合法利益得到保護,鞏固黨的群眾基礎。本文從城鎮(zhèn)化、宅基地制度、宅基地置換制度為切入點,分析了我國城鎮(zhèn)化的發(fā)展趨勢與問題所在,對我國宅基地制度發(fā)展歷程做了簡要的總結與分析,研究了宅基地置換制度的法律內(nèi)涵和現(xiàn)實意義。本文重點探討了宅基地置換補償問題,對其法學本質(zhì)和補償模式進行了簡要分析,同時總結并提出其現(xiàn)存法律規(guī)范中存在的一系列問題。最后通過對美國、日本相關法律研究借鑒,從實體法和程序法兩個方面對城鎮(zhèn)化中的宅基地置換補償問題進項研究。就實體法方面而言,現(xiàn)階段宅基地置換補償缺乏統(tǒng)一的法律規(guī)范,各地方政府自行制定地方性法規(guī)來加以規(guī)定和執(zhí)行,公正性得到質(zhì)疑。在程序法方面,由于缺乏實體法的統(tǒng)一規(guī)范,在宅基地置換補償?shù)恼麄�過程中,程序不合法現(xiàn)象普遍,而最為嚴重的便是缺乏公眾的參與,公告程序和聽證程序流于形式。在宅基地置換補償中,很多地方失地農(nóng)民的合法權利得不到有效的保護,這不僅是民生建設的大事,也影響到社會穩(wěn)定。為此,筆者認為制定統(tǒng)一的宅基地置換補償?shù)姆梢?guī)范已刻不容緩只有這樣才能不斷實現(xiàn)實體公正和程序公正,這不僅有利于保障失地農(nóng)民的合法權利,也有助于我國法律體系的不斷完善,推動法治社會的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of urbanization in China and the acceleration of urbanization process, in order to adapt to the development of urbanization, various localities have promoted the policy of land replacement. Homestead is not only related to national construction, economic development, but also the fundamental interests of farmers. In the process of homestead replacement, the phenomenon of violating the interests of land-lost farmers also appears. This paper studies the compensation of homestead replacement in the current urbanization of our country, which not only provides some help to perfect the legal system of homestead replacement compensation, but also provides more scientific and reasonable basis for the practice of homestead replacement compensation. It also provides reference for the relief channel of land lost farmers' rights, so that the legitimate interests of lost land farmers can be protected, and the mass foundation of the Party can be consolidated. From the perspective of urbanization, homestead system and homestead replacement system, this paper analyzes the development trend and problems of China's urbanization, and makes a brief summary and analysis of the development process of China's homestead system. This paper studies the legal connotation and practical significance of the house land replacement system. This paper focuses on the compensation for homestead replacement, briefly analyzes its legal nature and compensation mode, and sums up and puts forward a series of problems existing in its existing legal norms. Finally, through the relevant legal research of the United States and Japan, from the substantive law and procedural law to study the compensation for homestead replacement in urbanization. As far as the substantive law is concerned, the compensation for homestead replacement is lack of uniform legal norms at present, and local governments make local laws and regulations to regulate and implement them themselves, and the fairness of compensation is questioned. In the aspect of procedural law, due to the lack of unified norms of substantive law, in the whole process of compensation for homestead replacement, the illegality of the procedure is common, and the most serious is the lack of public participation, the announcement procedure and the hearing procedure are merely formal. In the compensation of homestead replacement, the legal rights of landless farmers in many places cannot be effectively protected, which is not only a great event in the construction of people's livelihood, but also has an impact on social stability. Therefore, the author believes that it is urgent to formulate a unified legal norm of compensation for the replacement of homestead. Only in this way can substantive justice and procedural justice be continuously realized, which is not only conducive to the protection of the legitimate rights of farmers who have lost their land. It is also conducive to the continuous improvement of our legal system and promote the development of the rule of law society.
【學位授予單位】：中國社會科學院研究生院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.2
本文編號：2441689
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of urbanization in China and the acceleration of urbanization process, in order to adapt to the development of urbanization, various localities have promoted the policy of land replacement. Homestead is not only related to national construction, economic development, but also the fundamental interests of farmers. In the process of homestead replacement, the phenomenon of violating the interests of land-lost farmers also appears. This paper studies the compensation of homestead replacement in the current urbanization of our country, which not only provides some help to perfect the legal system of homestead replacement compensation, but also provides more scientific and reasonable basis for the practice of homestead replacement compensation. It also provides reference for the relief channel of land lost farmers' rights, so that the legitimate interests of lost land farmers can be protected, and the mass foundation of the Party can be consolidated. From the perspective of urbanization, homestead system and homestead replacement system, this paper analyzes the development trend and problems of China's urbanization, and makes a brief summary and analysis of the development process of China's homestead system. This paper studies the legal connotation and practical significance of the house land replacement system. This paper focuses on the compensation for homestead replacement, briefly analyzes its legal nature and compensation mode, and sums up and puts forward a series of problems existing in its existing legal norms. Finally, through the relevant legal research of the United States and Japan, from the substantive law and procedural law to study the compensation for homestead replacement in urbanization. As far as the substantive law is concerned, the compensation for homestead replacement is lack of uniform legal norms at present, and local governments make local laws and regulations to regulate and implement them themselves, and the fairness of compensation is questioned. In the aspect of procedural law, due to the lack of unified norms of substantive law, in the whole process of compensation for homestead replacement, the illegality of the procedure is common, and the most serious is the lack of public participation, the announcement procedure and the hearing procedure are merely formal. In the compensation of homestead replacement, the legal rights of landless farmers in many places cannot be effectively protected, which is not only a great event in the construction of people's livelihood, but also has an impact on social stability. Therefore, the author believes that it is urgent to formulate a unified legal norm of compensation for the replacement of homestead. Only in this way can substantive justice and procedural justice be continuously realized, which is not only conducive to the protection of the legitimate rights of farmers who have lost their land. It is also conducive to the continuous improvement of our legal system and promote the development of the rule of law society.
【學位授予單位】：中國社會科學院研究生院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.2
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 張蕊;;國外土地征收補償制度考察[J];重慶科技學院學報(社會科學版);2011年02期
2 王書成;;論比例原則中的利益衡量[J];甘肅政法學院學報;2008年02期
3 鄭成良;論法治理念與法律思維[J];吉林大學社會科學學報;2000年04期
4 張瑛;;最低生活保障制度的效率分析[J];金陵科技學院學報(社會科學版);2008年04期
5 屈茂輝;周志芳;;中國土地征收補償標準研究——基于地方立法文本的分析[J];法學研究;2009年03期
6 朱林興;;農(nóng)村宅基地置換的若干問題[J];上海市經(jīng)濟管理干部學院學報;2006年02期
7 楊蘭橋;;我國新型城鎮(zhèn)化發(fā)展趨勢探討[J];區(qū)域經(jīng)濟評論;2013年06期
8 王靜;;中美土地征收和土地糾紛解決機制研討會綜述[J];行政法學研究;2008年04期
9 王遠燃;宅基地概念更新──湖北省的調(diào)查[J];中國土地;1998年12期
10 藍宇蘊;都市村社共同體——有關農(nóng)民城市化組織方式與生活方式的個案研究[J];中國社會科學;2005年02期
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 陳少瓊;土地征收法律問題研究[D];中國政法大學;2007年
相關碩士學位論文 前3條
1 成輝霞;失地農(nóng)民權益保護法律問題研究[D];蘭州大學;2013年
2 史波;集體土地征收補償標準法律問題研究[D];華中師范大學;2013年
3 康永信;中國特色城鎮(zhèn)化道路國際經(jīng)驗借鑒[D];云南財經(jīng)大學;2013年
，本文編號：2441689
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2441689.html
