論遺產(chǎn)歸扣制度的構(gòu)建
[Abstract]:In civil law, fairness is one of the most important principles. As an important part of inheritance law, the primary principle of division of inheritance should also be to maintain the fairness between common heirs, and the premise of realizing the fairness of division lies in the existence of definite and effective inheritance. The function of the system of deduction of inheritance is that it is intended by law that the successors should be treated fairly. When the succession occurs, the special gifts of life shall be included in the inheritance, the scope of the inheritance to be followed shall be determined, and the share of the successors shall be increased. So as to achieve the substantive equity of the division of heritage. From the perspective of the inheritance deduction system itself, it originates from Roman law and Germanic law, and has been generally accepted and developed in the civil codes of civil law countries (regions), playing the role of balancing the inheritance interests of the inheritors. It is an indispensable system of modern inheritance law. According to the current legal norms of our country, article 13 of the inheritance Law provides for the adoption of the principle of discretionary care, although the aim is to revise the right share, but due to its incomplete provisions, it is not possible to fully realize the function of balancing the interests of succession. Therefore, based on the absence of current legal norms and the eternal pursuit of fair value by law, the introduction of inheritance deduction system is an important aspect of perfecting the inheritance law of our country. This article mainly through the comparative research method, compares the inheritance deduction system with other similar inheritance division system, and demonstrates the irreplaceable nature of this system. At the same time, the author makes a comparative analysis of the legislation of the civil law countries (regions) and the Taiwan region of China on the system of deduction of heritage, and in the light of the local people's conditions and the legal system of our country, sets up a system that conforms to the trend of economic development in China and conforms to ethical It is beneficial to ease the contradiction and construct the heritage deduction system of harmonious society.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:煙臺大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2016
【分類號】:D923.5
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 榮成;;繼承人有清償被繼承人電費義務(wù)嗎?[J];農(nóng)電管理;2006年10期
2 李景林 ,熊裕武;試論被繼承人債務(wù)的清償[J];南昌大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);1986年01期
3 李玉珍;;繼承人以外對被繼承人扶養(yǎng)較多的人辦理取得遺產(chǎn)公證的問題[J];法學(xué)雜志;1992年04期
4 ;繼承人應(yīng)否承擔(dān)被繼承人生前的個人債務(wù)[J];黨員之友;1998年03期
5 榮成;對一起清償被繼承人電費債務(wù)糾紛案的評析[J];農(nóng)村電工;2005年02期
6 劉淑珍;被繼承人個人的財產(chǎn)才能繼承[J];人民司法;1985年04期
7 楊震;;關(guān)于限制被繼承人生前贈與行為問題的探討[J];法學(xué)研究;1988年05期
8 ;法定繼承人可以撤銷被繼承人的贈與嗎?[J];山西老年;2012年01期
9 ;如何認定繼承人虐待被繼承人情節(jié)是否嚴重[J];伴侶(A版);2002年08期
10 梁燕初;;繼承人如何領(lǐng)取被繼承人的存款?[J];八小時以外;2002年09期
相關(guān)會議論文 前3條
1 倪曉晶;;淺析遺產(chǎn)債權(quán)清償責(zé)任若干問題[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇(2008年第4輯)[C];2008年
2 蔣超;倪s,
本文編號:2439201
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2439201.html