違約責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任競(jìng)合問(wèn)題研究
[Abstract]:In the civil law of our country, the liability for breach of contract and the liability for tort have always been a controversial issue in the theoretical circle, and with the rapid development of various fields of society, the phenomenon of concurrence of liability occurs frequently, so in the field of judicial practice, The debate on this issue has also become increasingly prominent. The focus of the debate is how to maximize the protection of the rights and interests of the victim and avoid double responsibility of the aggressor when the two responsibilities coincide, in order to achieve this goal. This paper will discuss from four chapters: the first chapter defines the concept and causes of the concurrence of liability for breach of contract and liability for tort; For the discussion of a system, we should first clarify its concept and understand its causes, otherwise all the studies can not be started. The second chapter deals with the problem of concurrence between liability for breach of contract and liability for tort at home and abroad, and understand the current research situation of the problem, which is the premise of further study and final solution of the problem. Chapter three: the current situation and existing problems of the concurrence of liability for breach of contract and liability for tort. This paper points out the deficiency of dealing with the problem of concurrence of responsibilities in our country, which makes the new thinking more targeted and more targeted. The fourth chapter consummates our country breach of contract liability and the tort liability concurrence system. This chapter is the most important part of this paper, which is also the ultimate purpose of the study, the author will carry out in-depth analysis of the existing theoretical theory and legal provisions, compare the advantages and disadvantages of each point of view, Combined with judicial practice, some effective measures are put forward to further improve the system of liability concurrence in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:D923
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王勇;王俊銘;;論違約責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任的競(jìng)合[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年06期
2 毛步峰;;淺析違約責(zé)任和侵權(quán)責(zé)任的競(jìng)合問(wèn)題[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者;2014年23期
3 盛鈞俁;;淺析我國(guó)違約責(zé)任和侵權(quán)責(zé)任的競(jìng)合[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年05期
4 樊志軍;;合同法和侵權(quán)責(zé)任法的關(guān)系重構(gòu)——以侵權(quán)責(zé)任法的擴(kuò)張為背景[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)輯刊;2014年01期
5 陳良濤;;違約責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任競(jìng)合的反思與重構(gòu)[J];重慶交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年04期
6 方樂(lè)坤;;違約精神損害類型化分析[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期
7 王蔚;;從一則案例看合同履行中的附隨義務(wù)[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2011年12期
8 樊靜;;論違約責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任的競(jìng)合——一則酒店合同糾紛引發(fā)的思考[J];江西青年職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年04期
9 油妍利;;淺談違約責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任的邊界地帶——加害給付之合理救濟(jì)路徑[J];牡丹江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年11期
10 楊立新;;《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法草案》應(yīng)當(dāng)重點(diǎn)研究的20個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];河北法學(xué);2009年02期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 劉揚(yáng);違約責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任的競(jìng)合[D];西南政法大學(xué);2015年
2 虞一先;違約與侵權(quán)責(zé)任競(jìng)合問(wèn)題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2013年
3 歐紅;論違約責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任的競(jìng)合[D];山東大學(xué);2012年
,本文編號(hào):2402522
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2402522.html