【摘要】：隨著限購政策的推進,實踐中借名購房爭議的案件涌現(xiàn)。借名購房關系區(qū)別于借款買房關系、委托買房關系,其認定需具備借名買房合同、實際出資人、房屋居住狀況、房產(chǎn)證持有狀況等綜合因素認定。認定為借名購房關系,借名人基于合同的轉(zhuǎn)移登記請求權是否能得到支持,還需要進一步認定合同的效力。借名人或出名人能否確認物權或申請物權保護,除認定合同效力外,還需考慮事實物權與法律物權的關系,考慮我國物權的登記制度。本文主要通過案例分析、法理分析、法律后果分析等,認為判定借名購買商品房的合同是否違反公共利益應分情況討論,不應一概而論。在合同有效前提下,在出名人基于物權請求返還占有時,法院應根據(jù)借名人才系房屋真實權利人,而不予支持出名人請求。在借名人請求確認所有權時,法院也不應直接判定該房屋產(chǎn)權歸借名人所有,借名人并不為房屋真實權利人,應釋明借名人另行起訴房屋轉(zhuǎn)移登記的要求。
[Abstract]:With the promotion of the purchase restriction policy, the practice of borrowing name purchase dispute cases emerged. The relationship between borrowing and buying a house is different from the relationship of borrowing and buying a house, and the relationship of entrusting a house should be determined by comprehensive factors, such as the contract of borrowing a house, the actual investor, the living condition of a house, the holding condition of a real estate certificate, and so on. It is necessary to confirm the validity of the contract if the claim for transfer registration based on the contract can be supported or not. In order to confirm real right or apply for real right protection, we should consider the relationship between factual real right and legal real right, and the registration system of real right in our country. This article mainly through the case analysis, the legal theory analysis, the legal consequence analysis and so on, thinks that the judgment to borrow the name purchase the commercial house contract whether violates the public interest to be discussed, should not generalize. On the premise that the contract is valid, the court should not support the claim of the celebrity according to the fact that the celebrity is the real owner of the house, when the celebrity claims to return possession on the basis of the property right. When requesting confirmation of ownership by celebrity, the court should not directly decide that the property right of the house is owned by the borrowed celebrity, and that the celebrity is not the real owner of the house, and should explain the request of the celebrity to sue separately for the transfer registration of the house.
【學位授予單位】：廣東外語外貿(mào)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王利明;;構建統(tǒng)一的不動產(chǎn)物權公示制度——評《不動產(chǎn)登記暫行條例(征求意見稿)》[J];政治與法律;2014年12期

2 趙秀梅;;借名登記合同中的法律問題[J];國家檢察官學院學報;2014年05期

3 馬強;;借名購房案件所涉問題之研究——以法院裁判的案件為中心[J];政治與法律;2014年07期

4 楊興培;周愛萍;;擅自出售登記于自己名下他人房產(chǎn)的行為定性[J];法治研究;2014年04期

5 冉克平;;論借名實施法律行為的效果[J];法學;2014年02期

6 林誠二;;不動產(chǎn)物權變動登記之實與虛——以我國臺灣地區(qū)借名登記契約之相關問題為說明[J];北方法學;2014年01期

7 王逸軒;;限購令下借名購房行為的性質(zhì)——兩大法系下代理制度的視角[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年10期

8 周峰;李興;;隱名購房行為的法律性質(zhì)認定與執(zhí)法對策研究[J];法律適用;2012年08期

9 蔣光輝;;借名購買經(jīng)濟適用房之歸屬[J];人民司法;2012年15期

10 李德通;;規(guī)避限購令之借名購房行為的性質(zhì)與效力探討[J];法治研究;2012年04期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 陳益鳳;借名購房糾紛案件的法律適用研究[D];浙江大學;2013年

2 張麗燕;房產(chǎn)借名登記及其法律問題研究[D];華東政法大學;2011年

，

本文編號：2394640