【摘要】：善意取得制度在我國《物權(quán)法》中已經(jīng)有了明確的規(guī)范,隨著法律實踐的發(fā)展,該制度的適用對象和范圍在逐漸變廣,以遺失物為代表的占有脫離物在適用善意取得制度時有了具體而清晰的規(guī)定。但不可否認,《物權(quán)法》對于占有脫離物適用善意取得的規(guī)定還存在諸多局限和弊端,包括對遺失物善意取得規(guī)定不夠完善以及未規(guī)定盜贓物是否適用善意取得。隨著市場經(jīng)濟和商品交易的日益繁榮,占有脫離物通過交易渠道進入市場已經(jīng)成為普遍事實,善意買受人借由公開市場買入該占有脫離物,其權(quán)益是否能受到物權(quán)法的維護,成為司法裁判案例中反復進行探討的中心之一。本文結(jié)合實際司法案例,以權(quán)利外觀說為理論基礎(chǔ),立足于我國善意取得制度的現(xiàn)狀和未來,主張占有脫離物適用善意取得是正當合理的,并提出系統(tǒng)建立占有脫離物善意取得制度的建議。第一部分,占有脫離物善意取得存在的法律問題。首先引入司法裁判中關(guān)于遺失物和盜贓物的真實案例,結(jié)合該案例分析實務(wù)界存在的實踐問題。然后討論學界關(guān)于占有脫離物善意取得的各種學說理論,通過區(qū)分肯定主義和區(qū)分否定主義的理論對比提出理論爭議點分析。第二部分,占有脫離物善意取得的可行性分析。通過探討善意取得的理論依據(jù),選取最適合占有脫離物善意取得的權(quán)利外觀信賴保護理論,經(jīng)過分析得出占有脫離物是否適用善意取得的關(guān)鍵要素:原權(quán)利人的可歸責性,對該關(guān)鍵要素的解析得出占有脫離物適用善意取得制度具有正當性的結(jié)論。第三部分,占有脫離物善意取得的路徑設(shè)計。此部分先解讀了我國《物權(quán)法》第106條、107條的規(guī)定,并指出其中關(guān)于回復請求權(quán)部分的不合理性,然后針對占有脫離物提出其適用善意取得的一般構(gòu)成要件和特殊構(gòu)成要件,重點闡明了善意的標準和公開市場原則。最后提出構(gòu)建我國占有脫離物善意取得制度的立法建議。
[Abstract]:The system of bona fide acquisition has been clearly regulated in the Real right Law of our country. With the development of legal practice, the object and scope of application of this system are gradually becoming wider and wider. There are specific and clear regulations in the application of bona fide acquisition system. However, it is undeniable that there are still many limitations and drawbacks in the application of bona fide acquisition in the property Law, including the imperfect provisions on bona fide acquisition of lost property and whether the theft of stolen property is applicable to bona fide acquisition. With the increasing prosperity of market economy and commodity trade, it has become a universal fact that possession detachment enters the market through trading channels. If a bona fide buyer buys the possession separation through the open market, its rights and interests can be safeguarded by the property law. It has become one of the centers of repeated discussion in judicial adjudication cases. Based on the theory of the appearance of right and the present situation and future of the bona fide acquisition system in our country, it is just and reasonable to claim that the bona fide acquisition should be applied to the possession of detached objects. The paper also puts forward the suggestion of establishing the system of bona fide acquisition of possession separation. The first part is about the legal problems of bona fide acquisition of possession. Firstly, this paper introduces the real cases of lost property and stolen property in the judicial decision, and analyzes the practical problems in the practical field. Then it discusses various theories about the bona fide acquisition of possession from material, and puts forward the theoretical controversy point by comparing the theory of positivism with the theory of differentiating negativism. The second part is the feasibility analysis of bona fide acquisition of possession separation. Through discussing the theoretical basis of bona fide acquisition, selecting the theory of the right appearance trust protection which is most suitable for the bona fide acquisition of possession detachment, the key element of bona fide acquisition of possession detachment is obtained: the imputability of the original right holder, and the analysis of whether the possession detachment is suitable for bona fide acquisition. The conclusion that the bona fide acquisition system is applicable to possession detachment is justified by the analysis of the key element. The third part is the path design of bona fide acquisition of possession separation. This part first interprets the provisions of Article 106, 107 of Real Law of our country, and points out the irrationality of the part about the right of claim to reply, and then puts forward the general and special constitutive elements of its application of bona fide acquisition in view of possession separation. The good faith standard and open market principle are expounded in detail. Finally, the author puts forward some legislative suggestions on constructing the bona fide acquisition system of possession separation in our country.
【學位授予單位】：上海交通大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張洪波;;脫離物的善意取得[J];河北法學;2008年12期

2 羅忻全;顏雙玲;;對《物權(quán)法》未規(guī)定盜贓物善意取得的反思[J];成都理工大學學報(社會科學版);2008年02期

3 熊丙萬;;論贓物的善意取得及其回復請求權(quán)[J];法律科學(西北政法學院學報);2008年02期

4 侯巍;;善意取得與占有脫離物:價值定位·制度選擇[J];學術(shù)論壇;2007年09期

5 李詠;;論盜贓物、遺失物的善意取得[J];時代法學;2006年06期

6 程嘯;尹飛;;論物權(quán)法中占有的權(quán)利推定規(guī)則[J];法律科學.西北政法學院學報;2006年06期

7 徐嵐;善意取得制度新論[J];西南政法大學學報;2005年05期

8 王軼;動產(chǎn)善意取得制度一般規(guī)定立法化研究———兼評《中華人民共和國物權(quán)法》(草案)第111條[J];政治與法律;2005年05期

9 孫鵬;民法上信賴保護制度及其法的構(gòu)成——在靜的安全與交易安全之間[J];西南民族大學學報(人文社科版);2005年07期

10 王利明,王軼;動產(chǎn)善意取得制度研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學;1997年05期

，

本文編號：2393729