環(huán)境侵權溢出性研究—兼評《侵權責任法》第65條
發(fā)布時間：2018-12-19 12:16
【摘要】：科學日新月異的發(fā)展帶來企業(yè)生產(chǎn)活動的技術性、專業(yè)性不斷提高,從而引發(fā)的環(huán)境問題不可避免成為制約社會發(fā)展的重要環(huán)節(jié)。隨著環(huán)境問題不斷引發(fā),傳統(tǒng)以“排放”為主的環(huán)境污染侵權形式已無法涵蓋環(huán)境侵權的所有內(nèi)容,進入立法者和普通大眾視線的是損害更為嚴重的生態(tài)破壞,且生態(tài)破壞因其自身特殊性,《侵權責任法》無力應對。2016年4月14日,第424期民商法前沿論壇在中國人民大學隆重舉行。會議針對當前環(huán)境侵權溢出性問題進行廣泛討論,相關環(huán)境法學者做了發(fā)言,表達了對問題進行整治的急迫心情。現(xiàn)行《侵權責任法》將環(huán)境問題作為單獨章節(jié)加以調(diào)整,并以“環(huán)境污染責任為題”,第65條也做出了“因污染環(huán)境造成損害的,污染者應當承擔侵權責任”的相應規(guī)定。在環(huán)境侵權問題上,一些立法理念其標準并非實質(zhì)意義上的價值衡量,而是一種“經(jīng)濟發(fā)展優(yōu)先”的思想。公法與私法的沖突,人身權利、財產(chǎn)權利以及精神權利的私益性與環(huán)境侵權的公益性之間的矛盾,正隨著環(huán)境問題的發(fā)展不斷涌現(xiàn),引發(fā)學者廣泛關注。本文以《侵權責任法》第65條為視角,對侵權法所存在的問題,環(huán)境侵權面臨的困境進行分析,運用各種研究方法,在對國內(nèi)外相關立法進行學習的基礎上,提出自己的一些見解。并對環(huán)境侵權的溢出性問題做積極可行性設想,以此突破傳統(tǒng)民法框架,尋求環(huán)境侵權問題更理想的走向。
[Abstract]:The rapid development of science has brought about the technical and professional development of enterprises' production activities, which inevitably leads to environmental problems that restrict the development of society. With the environmental problems being caused constantly, the traditional environmental pollution tort form based on "discharge" has been unable to cover all the contents of the environmental tort, and it is the more serious ecological damage that has come to the attention of the legislators and the general public. Because of its own particularity, the Tort liability Law is unable to deal with ecological damage. On April 14, 2016, the 424 Forum on the Frontier of Civil and Commercial Law was held in Renmin University of China. At the meeting, the spillover problem of environmental tort was extensively discussed, and the relevant environmental law scholars made a speech, expressing the urgency of solving the problem. The current Tort liability Law adjusts environmental issues as a separate chapter, and takes environmental pollution liability as its title. Article 65 also provides that "polluters shall bear tort liability if damage is caused by pollution to the environment". On the issue of environmental tort, the standard of some legislative ideas is not the value measure in essence, but a thought of "economic development first". The conflict between public law and private law, the contradiction between personal rights, property rights and spiritual rights, and the public welfare of environmental tort, is emerging with the development of environmental problems, which has aroused widespread concern of scholars. From the perspective of Article 65 of the Tort liability Law, this paper analyzes the problems existing in the Tort Law and the plight of the Environmental Tort, and applies various research methods to study the relevant legislation at home and abroad. Put forward some of your own ideas. And make the positive feasibility assumption to the spillover problem of the environmental tort, so as to break through the traditional civil law frame, and seek the more ideal trend of the environmental tort problem.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923
本文編號：2386906
[Abstract]:The rapid development of science has brought about the technical and professional development of enterprises' production activities, which inevitably leads to environmental problems that restrict the development of society. With the environmental problems being caused constantly, the traditional environmental pollution tort form based on "discharge" has been unable to cover all the contents of the environmental tort, and it is the more serious ecological damage that has come to the attention of the legislators and the general public. Because of its own particularity, the Tort liability Law is unable to deal with ecological damage. On April 14, 2016, the 424 Forum on the Frontier of Civil and Commercial Law was held in Renmin University of China. At the meeting, the spillover problem of environmental tort was extensively discussed, and the relevant environmental law scholars made a speech, expressing the urgency of solving the problem. The current Tort liability Law adjusts environmental issues as a separate chapter, and takes environmental pollution liability as its title. Article 65 also provides that "polluters shall bear tort liability if damage is caused by pollution to the environment". On the issue of environmental tort, the standard of some legislative ideas is not the value measure in essence, but a thought of "economic development first". The conflict between public law and private law, the contradiction between personal rights, property rights and spiritual rights, and the public welfare of environmental tort, is emerging with the development of environmental problems, which has aroused widespread concern of scholars. From the perspective of Article 65 of the Tort liability Law, this paper analyzes the problems existing in the Tort Law and the plight of the Environmental Tort, and applies various research methods to study the relevant legislation at home and abroad. Put forward some of your own ideas. And make the positive feasibility assumption to the spillover problem of the environmental tort, so as to break through the traditional civil law frame, and seek the more ideal trend of the environmental tort problem.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 竺效;;論環(huán)境侵權原因行為的立法拓展[J];中國法學;2015年02期
2 王利民;李昱;;環(huán)境侵權責任的構成:解讀新《環(huán)境保護法》第64條[J];遼寧大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2014年06期
3 呂忠梅;;論生態(tài)文明建設的綜合決策法律機制[J];中國法學;2014年03期
4 竺效;;論中國環(huán)境法基本原則的立法發(fā)展與再發(fā)展[J];華東政法大學學報;2014年03期
5 呂忠梅;;生態(tài)文明建設的法治思考[J];法學雜志;2014年05期
6 張新寶;莊超;;擴張與強化:環(huán)境侵權責任的綜合適用[J];中國社會科學;2014年03期
7 曾祥生;方昀;;環(huán)境侵權行為的特征及其類型化研究[J];武漢大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2013年01期
8 薛丹;;基于環(huán)境責任保險的動態(tài)環(huán)境侵權救濟體系研究[J];中國人口.資源與環(huán)境;2012年07期
9 王曉輝;;日本公害補償制度評析與借鑒[J];環(huán)境保護;2011年16期
10 戴茂華;;論進一步完善我國環(huán)境侵權民事責任立法的必要性——兼評《侵權責任法》中環(huán)境污染責任條款[J];河北法學;2011年01期
相關重要報紙文章 前1條
1 呂忠梅;;論環(huán)境侵權的二元性[N];人民法院報;2014年
，本文編號：2386906
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2386906.html
