保證合同效力研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-12-12 05:10
【摘要】：作為一種基于基礎(chǔ)合同和保證合同而產(chǎn)生的債權(quán)擔(dān)保方式,保證在本質(zhì)上是一種合同之債,債權(quán)人基于保證合同向保證人行使合同之債請求權(quán),保證人則基于保證合同行使相應(yīng)的抗辯權(quán)利,雙方權(quán)利義務(wù)的起點都是保證合同的效力問題,在實踐中,當(dāng)事人也易于陷入合同效力問題的爭執(zhí)。對保證這一擔(dān)保制度的探討應(yīng)當(dāng)以對保證合同效力的確認(rèn)為邏輯起點。故而本文企圖以保證合同效力為研究對象,以通行的合同效力理論和主從合同理論為基礎(chǔ),結(jié)合各方觀點和域外立法例及我國現(xiàn)行法,以法解釋學(xué)和比較研究為主要方法,對涉及保證合同效力的部分特定法律問題展開探討。在行文結(jié)構(gòu)上,本文分六個部分加以分析。緒論部分主要敘述文章寫作的緣起以及文章要探討的主要問題以及寫作本文所欲實現(xiàn)的意圖。第一章研究的是保證合同成立的有關(guān)問題,特別是對保證合意的范圍以及保證合同的特殊形式加以了細(xì)致的分析。第二章針對影響保證合同自身效力的合同主體因素、意思表示因素以及效力性強制規(guī)范因素三個角度分別加以研究,其中以對影響當(dāng)事人保證意思真實和自由的多種情形的研究為重點。第三章是從主從合同理論出發(fā)對保證合同效力從屬性規(guī)則相關(guān)問題的論述,其中研究的重點是保證合同效力從屬性規(guī)則是否應(yīng)當(dāng)允許當(dāng)事人以合意加以排除的問題。第四章是依從立法對保證合同無效原因兩個方面的界定,分別對兩種無效類型下原保證人責(zé)任承擔(dān)這一特別問題加以研究,本章立足現(xiàn)行法對保證無效后原保證人責(zé)任承擔(dān)的規(guī)定,陳述了作者對這一問題的基本觀點。結(jié)束語部分是對論文主要觀點的總體性概括,坦陳作者對論文議題研究的局限與不足。本文的研究目的在于分析現(xiàn)行法律對保證合同效力規(guī)定的瑕疵與不足,以期為未來立法關(guān)于保證合同效力的規(guī)定提供一定的建議。筆者相信,隨著我國民法法典化工作的展開,對保證的相關(guān)規(guī)定也將日趨合理,保證這一擔(dān)保方式在市場交易中的作用也會進(jìn)一步地發(fā)揮。
[Abstract]:As a form of creditor's rights guarantee based on the basic contract and the guarantee contract, the guarantee is essentially a contractual debt, and the creditor exercises the contractual right of claim against the guarantor on the basis of the guarantee contract. The guarantor is based on the guarantee contract to exercise the corresponding defense rights. The starting point of both parties' rights and obligations is the validity of the guarantee contract. In practice, the parties are also prone to get into disputes about the validity of the contract. The discussion of the guarantee system should take the validity of the guarantee contract as the logical starting point. Therefore, this paper attempts to take the guarantee of contract validity as the object of study, based on the prevailing contract effectiveness theory and the principal and subordinate contract theory, combining the views of various parties, the extraterritorial legislative cases and the current law of our country, and taking the hermeneutics of law and comparative study as the main methods. This paper discusses some specific legal issues concerning the validity of the guarantee contract. In the structure of the text, this paper is divided into six parts to analyze. The introduction part mainly narrates the origin of writing, the main problems to be discussed and the intention of writing this paper. The first chapter is concerned with the establishment of warranty contract, especially the scope of surety agreement and the special form of surety contract. The second chapter focuses on the factors of the contract subject, the expression of will and the mandatory norm of validity, which affect the validity of the contract itself. Among them, it focuses on the research of various situations that affect the parties' guarantee of meaning authenticity and freedom. The third chapter is the discussion of the rules of subordinate attribute of guarantee contract from the view of the theory of principal and slave contract, in which the focus of the study is whether the rules of subordinate attribute of guarantee contract should be excluded by agreement of the parties. The fourth chapter is the definition of the reason of invalidity of guarantee contract according to the legislation, and studies the special problem of the original guarantor's liability under the two kinds of invalid types. Based on the provisions of the current law on the liability of the original guarantor after the invalidation of the guarantee, this chapter states the author's basic views on this issue. The conclusion part is a general summary of the main points of the thesis, and frankly states the limitations and shortcomings of the author's research on the topic of the thesis. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the defects and deficiencies of the existing law on the validity of the warranty contract, in order to provide some suggestions for the future legislation on the validity of the guarantee contract. The author believes that with the development of the codification of the civil law in China, the relevant provisions of the guarantee will be more reasonable, and the role of the guarantee in the market transaction will be further developed.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.6
本文編號：2373976
[Abstract]:As a form of creditor's rights guarantee based on the basic contract and the guarantee contract, the guarantee is essentially a contractual debt, and the creditor exercises the contractual right of claim against the guarantor on the basis of the guarantee contract. The guarantor is based on the guarantee contract to exercise the corresponding defense rights. The starting point of both parties' rights and obligations is the validity of the guarantee contract. In practice, the parties are also prone to get into disputes about the validity of the contract. The discussion of the guarantee system should take the validity of the guarantee contract as the logical starting point. Therefore, this paper attempts to take the guarantee of contract validity as the object of study, based on the prevailing contract effectiveness theory and the principal and subordinate contract theory, combining the views of various parties, the extraterritorial legislative cases and the current law of our country, and taking the hermeneutics of law and comparative study as the main methods. This paper discusses some specific legal issues concerning the validity of the guarantee contract. In the structure of the text, this paper is divided into six parts to analyze. The introduction part mainly narrates the origin of writing, the main problems to be discussed and the intention of writing this paper. The first chapter is concerned with the establishment of warranty contract, especially the scope of surety agreement and the special form of surety contract. The second chapter focuses on the factors of the contract subject, the expression of will and the mandatory norm of validity, which affect the validity of the contract itself. Among them, it focuses on the research of various situations that affect the parties' guarantee of meaning authenticity and freedom. The third chapter is the discussion of the rules of subordinate attribute of guarantee contract from the view of the theory of principal and slave contract, in which the focus of the study is whether the rules of subordinate attribute of guarantee contract should be excluded by agreement of the parties. The fourth chapter is the definition of the reason of invalidity of guarantee contract according to the legislation, and studies the special problem of the original guarantor's liability under the two kinds of invalid types. Based on the provisions of the current law on the liability of the original guarantor after the invalidation of the guarantee, this chapter states the author's basic views on this issue. The conclusion part is a general summary of the main points of the thesis, and frankly states the limitations and shortcomings of the author's research on the topic of the thesis. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the defects and deficiencies of the existing law on the validity of the warranty contract, in order to provide some suggestions for the future legislation on the validity of the guarantee contract. The author believes that with the development of the codification of the civil law in China, the relevant provisions of the guarantee will be more reasonable, and the role of the guarantee in the market transaction will be further developed.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.6
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條
1 冉克平;;締約過失責(zé)任性質(zhì)新論——以德國學(xué)說與判例的變遷為視角[J];河北法學(xué);2010年02期
2 黃海英;合同解除與保證人責(zé)任[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2001年02期
3 高宇,楊述伊;論無效保證合同中保證人的締約過失責(zé)任[J];松遼學(xué)刊(人文社會科學(xué)版);2002年01期
4 張平華;吳兆祥;;論保證合同中的意思表示問題[J];人民司法;2006年07期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 楊柳;不真正連帶債務(wù)制度研究[D];山東大學(xué);2011年
，本文編號：2373976
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2373976.html
最近更新
教材專著
