論遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)的清償程序
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-29 13:43
【摘要】：隨著民間債權(quán)債務(wù)關(guān)系趨于復(fù)雜化和多樣化,自然人死后其遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)糾紛也開(kāi)始變得復(fù)雜和多樣,遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償問(wèn)題成為了司法實(shí)踐中的一個(gè)難題。對(duì)于如何解決遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償問(wèn)題,我國(guó)眾多學(xué)者從立法的角度對(duì)如何進(jìn)行制度設(shè)計(jì)以及如何進(jìn)行立法提出了眾多觀點(diǎn),并展開(kāi)了大量論述,但是卻鮮有學(xué)者論及如何依據(jù)現(xiàn)有立法規(guī)定來(lái)妥善處理遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)糾紛。立法未行,但實(shí)踐中遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償案件卻不斷發(fā)生,雖然完善立法是解決遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償問(wèn)題的最終辦法,但是探討如何在現(xiàn)有立法條件下妥善解決遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)糾紛,則能解當(dāng)前司法實(shí)踐中的燃眉之急。因此,本文擬在現(xiàn)有立法規(guī)定的基礎(chǔ)之上,對(duì)如何依照或參照有關(guān)法律規(guī)定妥善解決遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償問(wèn)題進(jìn)行探討,希望能夠?qū)λ痉▽?shí)踐中解決該問(wèn)題提供幫助。本文共有個(gè)三部分,約25000字。第一部分為我國(guó)遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償?shù)牧⒎ìF(xiàn)狀及司法困境。本部分主要探討了我國(guó)在遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償方面的立法現(xiàn)狀,介紹了司法實(shí)踐中處理遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償案件的一般做法,概括出了我國(guó)在遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償方面的立法特點(diǎn)及司法上存在的問(wèn)題。第二部分為港澳臺(tái)地區(qū)及外國(guó)的遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償制度。本部分主要探討了我國(guó)港澳臺(tái)地區(qū)以及一些發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn),介紹了港澳臺(tái)地區(qū)及外國(guó)的立法成果與實(shí)務(wù)經(jīng)驗(yàn),包括遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)的范圍、直接和間接繼承制度、遺產(chǎn)管理制度、遺產(chǎn)清冊(cè)制度、遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償順序等。通過(guò)這一部分的寫(xiě)作,有利于對(duì)我國(guó)的遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償制度進(jìn)行比較研究,為第三部分的寫(xiě)作提供參考。第三部分為遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償程序的完善。該部分是在前兩部分的基礎(chǔ)之上,提出如何在現(xiàn)有立法條件下妥善解決遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償案件的方案。本部分論述的內(nèi)容包括:應(yīng)否以及如何進(jìn)行遺產(chǎn)債權(quán)人登記;如何采用符合遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償案件特點(diǎn)的特殊審理方法;如何確定各種遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)的清償順序;遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償案件中的調(diào)解應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循哪些特殊規(guī)則。總之,依據(jù)現(xiàn)有立法規(guī)定來(lái)對(duì)遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償問(wèn)題進(jìn)行探討是本文法人基本前提,本文的宗旨即是要在承認(rèn)現(xiàn)有立法存在不足的基礎(chǔ)之上,探討如何從現(xiàn)有立法規(guī)定中尋找依據(jù)來(lái)妥善處理遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償案件。
[Abstract]:With the complexity and diversification of the relationship between the private creditor's rights and the debt, the disputes of the natural person's estate debt become complex and diverse, and the settlement of the estate debt becomes a difficult problem in the judicial practice. As to how to solve the problem of settlement of legacy debt, many scholars in our country have put forward many viewpoints on how to design the system and how to legislate from the angle of legislation, and have carried out a large number of discussions. However, few scholars have discussed how to properly deal with disputes over estate debts according to existing legislation. Although perfecting legislation is the ultimate solution to the problem of settlement of legacy debt, it discusses how to properly solve the disputes of estate debt under the existing legislative conditions. It can solve the urgent need in the current judicial practice. Therefore, on the basis of the existing legislative provisions, this paper discusses how to properly solve the problem of settlement of estate debts in accordance with or referring to the relevant legal provisions, hoping to help solve this problem in judicial practice. This paper has three parts, about 25000 words. The first part is the legislative situation and judicial dilemma of the settlement of our country's estate debt. This part mainly discusses the current situation of legislation on settlement of estate debts in China, and introduces the general practice of dealing with cases of settlement of legacy debts in judicial practice. This paper summarizes the legislative characteristics and judicial problems in the settlement of estate debts in China. The second part is the legacy debt settlement system of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan and foreign countries. This part mainly discusses the legislative experience of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan in China and some developed countries, and introduces the legislative achievements and practical experience of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan and foreign countries, including the scope of legacy debt, direct and indirect inheritance system. Estate management system, estate inventory system, legacy debt settlement order, etc. The writing of this part is conducive to the comparative study of the system of settlement of legacy debts in China, and provides a reference for the third part of writing. The third part is the perfection of the procedure of settlement of estate debts. On the basis of the first two parts, this part puts forward the scheme of how to settle the case of settlement of estate debt properly under the condition of existing legislation. The contents of this part include: whether and how to register the estate creditors, how to adopt the special trial method which accords with the characteristics of the settlement cases of the estate debts, how to determine the order of settlement of the various kinds of estate debts; What special rules should be followed in settlement of estate debts. In a word, it is the basic premise of this article to discuss the settlement of estate debt according to the existing legislation. The purpose of this paper is to recognize the deficiency of the existing legislation. This paper probes into how to find the basis from the existing legislation to properly deal with the settlement of estate debts.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.5
本文編號(hào)：2365147
[Abstract]:With the complexity and diversification of the relationship between the private creditor's rights and the debt, the disputes of the natural person's estate debt become complex and diverse, and the settlement of the estate debt becomes a difficult problem in the judicial practice. As to how to solve the problem of settlement of legacy debt, many scholars in our country have put forward many viewpoints on how to design the system and how to legislate from the angle of legislation, and have carried out a large number of discussions. However, few scholars have discussed how to properly deal with disputes over estate debts according to existing legislation. Although perfecting legislation is the ultimate solution to the problem of settlement of legacy debt, it discusses how to properly solve the disputes of estate debt under the existing legislative conditions. It can solve the urgent need in the current judicial practice. Therefore, on the basis of the existing legislative provisions, this paper discusses how to properly solve the problem of settlement of estate debts in accordance with or referring to the relevant legal provisions, hoping to help solve this problem in judicial practice. This paper has three parts, about 25000 words. The first part is the legislative situation and judicial dilemma of the settlement of our country's estate debt. This part mainly discusses the current situation of legislation on settlement of estate debts in China, and introduces the general practice of dealing with cases of settlement of legacy debts in judicial practice. This paper summarizes the legislative characteristics and judicial problems in the settlement of estate debts in China. The second part is the legacy debt settlement system of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan and foreign countries. This part mainly discusses the legislative experience of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan in China and some developed countries, and introduces the legislative achievements and practical experience of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan and foreign countries, including the scope of legacy debt, direct and indirect inheritance system. Estate management system, estate inventory system, legacy debt settlement order, etc. The writing of this part is conducive to the comparative study of the system of settlement of legacy debts in China, and provides a reference for the third part of writing. The third part is the perfection of the procedure of settlement of estate debts. On the basis of the first two parts, this part puts forward the scheme of how to settle the case of settlement of estate debt properly under the condition of existing legislation. The contents of this part include: whether and how to register the estate creditors, how to adopt the special trial method which accords with the characteristics of the settlement cases of the estate debts, how to determine the order of settlement of the various kinds of estate debts; What special rules should be followed in settlement of estate debts. In a word, it is the basic premise of this article to discuss the settlement of estate debt according to the existing legislation. The purpose of this paper is to recognize the deficiency of the existing legislation. This paper probes into how to find the basis from the existing legislation to properly deal with the settlement of estate debts.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.5
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 蒙冬梅;;論遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)的清償[J];廣西師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期
2 秦琴,徐秉暉,袁文全;論遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)的清償[J];重慶工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期
3 馬鈺?shū)P;;我國(guó)遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償順序之重構(gòu)[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年04期
4 姜大偉;;我國(guó)遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償順序探析[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2012年10期
5 杜江涌;;我國(guó)遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償順序的立法構(gòu)想[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會(huì)科學(xué)(漢文版);2008年05期
6 陳葦;;我國(guó)遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償順序的立法構(gòu)建[J];法學(xué);2012年08期
7 單國(guó)勝;;繼承了父親的公司 公司的債務(wù)就由我一人償還嗎[J];新農(nóng)村;2007年04期
8 ;放棄繼承權(quán)的繼承人可以請(qǐng)求分得遺產(chǎn)的繼承人補(bǔ)償其履行的遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)[J];司法業(yè)務(wù)文選;2006年21期
9 郭騰文;;論遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償范圍[J];新經(jīng)濟(jì);2013年09期
10 張力;遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償?shù)捻樞騕J];廣西社會(huì)科學(xué);2003年01期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條
1 山東省威海市環(huán)翠區(qū)人民法院 解品彩;被執(zhí)行人已死亡 本案中債務(wù)如何清償[N];建筑時(shí)報(bào);2013年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 杜江涌;遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條
1 王歡;論遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)的清償[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2015年
2 曾馴;論遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)的清償程序[D];西南政法大學(xué);2015年
3 宋婷婷;論遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)的清償[D];遼寧大學(xué);2010年
4 楊金鎖;遺產(chǎn)債權(quán)人利益保護(hù)問(wèn)題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2011年
，本文編號(hào)：2365147
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2365147.html
最近更新
教材專著
