論剽竊的著作權侵權責任
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-27 14:57
【摘要】：本文通過對剽竊侵權行為概念、構成要件、歸責原則的分析,提出我國的剽竊在著作權法領域的相關配套制度的建議:在剽竊侵權的歸責原則應適用無過錯歸責原則,且應把剽竊侵權視為“行為犯”一經(jīng)實行即成立,同時應把剽竊侵權上升到刑法的保護范疇,在第217條的基礎上增加一款“以營利為目的,行使著作權并混淆了出處,從而使著作權人的著作權受到經(jīng)濟上的損害的剽竊行為”,以達震懾和預防之效,這樣使得在認定標準上化繁為簡,大量的著作權侵權案件就可以得到認定和追究,從而可以更好地保護著作權人的利益。對于侵權情節(jié)嚴重的,應適用懲罰性賠償和依申請適用精神損害賠償,一方面起到補償之效,另一方面能夠從根源上起到預防作用。
[Abstract]:Based on the analysis of the concept of plagiarism tort, the constitutive elements and the principle of imputation, this paper puts forward some suggestions for the relevant system of plagiarism in the field of copyright law: the principle of no-fault imputation should be applied in the principle of imputation of plagiarism infringement. Plagiarism infringement should be regarded as a "criminal offense" once it is carried out. At the same time, plagiarism infringement should be raised to the protection scope of criminal law. On the basis of article 217, a new paragraph should be added: "for profit purposes, for the purpose of exercising copyright and confusing the source." As a result, the copyright of the copyright owner is subjected to economic damage and plagiarism ", in order to achieve the effect of deterrence and prevention, so as to simplify the standard of recognition, a large number of copyright infringement cases can be identified and investigated. In order to better protect the interests of copyright owners. For the serious circumstances of infringement, punitive damages and spiritual damages should be applied, on the one hand, the effect of compensation can be played, on the other hand, it can play a preventive role from the root.
【學位授予單位】：暨南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.41
[Abstract]:Based on the analysis of the concept of plagiarism tort, the constitutive elements and the principle of imputation, this paper puts forward some suggestions for the relevant system of plagiarism in the field of copyright law: the principle of no-fault imputation should be applied in the principle of imputation of plagiarism infringement. Plagiarism infringement should be regarded as a "criminal offense" once it is carried out. At the same time, plagiarism infringement should be raised to the protection scope of criminal law. On the basis of article 217, a new paragraph should be added: "for profit purposes, for the purpose of exercising copyright and confusing the source." As a result, the copyright of the copyright owner is subjected to economic damage and plagiarism ", in order to achieve the effect of deterrence and prevention, so as to simplify the standard of recognition, a large number of copyright infringement cases can be identified and investigated. In order to better protect the interests of copyright owners. For the serious circumstances of infringement, punitive damages and spiritual damages should be applied, on the one hand, the effect of compensation can be played, on the other hand, it can play a preventive role from the root.
【學位授予單位】：暨南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.41
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 李亮,施迎華;網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境下著作權侵權若干問題思考[J];湖北省社會主義學院學報;2001年04期
2 ;國內(nèi)最大期刊數(shù)據(jù)庫著作權侵權案一審宣判[J];電網(wǎng)技術;2004年20期
3 于博;李運倉;;網(wǎng)絡鏈接中的著作權侵權責任[J];經(jīng)濟論壇;2006年03期
4 楊晨巖;;淺談著作權侵權的法律賠償[J];才智;2012年34期
5 鄧錫敏;常見教材著作權侵權與對策[J];科技與出版;1997年04期
6 閆桂貞;因特網(wǎng)著作權侵權類型[J];中國出版;2000年10期
7 張曉霞;著作權侵權責任中的若干問題[J];北京建筑工程學院學報;2000年04期
8 溫旭;法律的車輪總比科技的車輪慢半拍──簡評王蒙等六作家訴北京某網(wǎng)站著作權侵權案[J];科技與法律;2000年01期
9 辛尚民,張靈;我國首例網(wǎng)絡著作權侵權案引發(fā)的思考(下)[J];中國司法;2001年01期
10 ;關于反對著作權侵權的聲明[J];上海市政法管理干部學院學報;2001年04期
相關會議論文 前4條
1 劉遠山;李波;;論我國著作權侵權的認定和制裁[A];當代法學論壇（2007年第3輯）[C];2007年
2 劉s，
本文編號：2361197
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2361197.html
