論贓物的善意取得
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-07 19:48
【摘要】：善意取得在各國(guó)民法中都是一項(xiàng)非常重要的法律制度,我國(guó)的《物權(quán)法》中也對(duì)善意取得進(jìn)行了明確的規(guī)定,而關(guān)于贓物能否適用善意取得卻沒(méi)有作出規(guī)定。從《物權(quán)法草案》中我們可以看出相關(guān)學(xué)者提出了這一問(wèn)題,而在正式頒布的《物權(quán)法》中沒(méi)有見(jiàn)到它的蹤影,這是一件非常令人惋惜的事情。善意取得的本質(zhì)是犧牲靜的財(cái)產(chǎn)所有權(quán),從而確保動(dòng)態(tài)交易安全的順利進(jìn)行。善意取得能否適用于贓物是原所有權(quán)人的利益與善意第三人利益之間的權(quán)衡問(wèn)題,正確的處理二者之間的關(guān)系是贓物能否適用善意取得的前提。 本文就贓物的善意取得展開(kāi)論述,文章主要分為四個(gè)部分。第一部分主要講述了贓物善意取得的相關(guān)理論問(wèn)題。首先對(duì)善意取得的理論問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了介紹；其次,從贓物入手,對(duì)贓物概念進(jìn)行了界定、對(duì)贓物的特征與性質(zhì)予以分析,還對(duì)占有委托物和占有脫離物進(jìn)行了區(qū)分。第二部分主要講述了外國(guó)和我國(guó)臺(tái)灣的法律對(duì)贓物善意取得問(wèn)題是如何規(guī)定的。國(guó)外關(guān)于贓物的善意取得主要有三種觀(guān)點(diǎn),即完全適用、完全不適用以及有條件的適用,而且文中還分析了各國(guó)采用不同制度的理由。第三部分主要介紹我國(guó)對(duì)贓物善意取得的立法評(píng)析。學(xué)者們對(duì)這一問(wèn)題的看法各不相同,通過(guò)對(duì)各種觀(guān)點(diǎn)的解析,最終筆者認(rèn)為有條件適用贓物善意取得的觀(guān)點(diǎn)是合理的,并對(duì)其合理性進(jìn)行了分析。第四部分是關(guān)于贓物善意取得的法律完善。文章主要從立法和司法兩個(gè)方面進(jìn)行了完善,可以在立法上規(guī)定贓物善意取得的構(gòu)成要件,以及在司法上出臺(tái)相應(yīng)的司法解釋,即參照關(guān)于遺失物的規(guī)定處理贓物問(wèn)題,并借鑒國(guó)外的公開(kāi)市場(chǎng)原則,與此同時(shí)文中還規(guī)定了贓物的回復(fù)問(wèn)題。
[Abstract]:Bona fide acquisition is a very important legal system in the civil law of various countries. In our country's Real right Law, there are clear provisions on bona fide acquisition, but there is no provision as to whether bona fide acquisition can be applied to stolen goods. From the draft of the Real right Law, we can see that the relevant scholars have raised this problem, but they have not seen it in the official Law of Real right, which is a very regrettable thing. The essence of bona fide acquisition is to sacrifice the ownership of property in order to ensure the smooth progress of the dynamic transaction. Whether the bona fide acquisition can be applied to the stolen goods is a trade-off between the interests of the original owner and the bona fide third party, and the correct handling of the relationship between the two is the premise of whether the stolen goods can be applied to the bona fide acquisition. This paper discusses the bona fide acquisition of stolen goods, the article is divided into four parts. The first part mainly describes the relevant theoretical issues of bona fide acquisition of stolen goods. Firstly, the theory of bona fide acquisition is introduced; secondly, the concept of stolen goods is defined, the characteristics and properties of stolen goods are analyzed, and the distinction between possession entrustment and possession separation is made. The second part mainly describes how the foreign and Taiwan laws regulate the bona fide acquisition of stolen goods. There are three main points of view about bona fide acquisition of stolen goods in foreign countries, that is, complete application, complete inapplicability and conditional application, and the reasons why countries adopt different systems are also analyzed in this paper. The third part mainly introduces the legislation evaluation of bona fide acquisition of stolen goods in China. Scholars have different views on this issue. Through the analysis of various viewpoints, the author finally thinks that it is reasonable to apply the idea of obtaining stolen goods in good faith under conditions, and analyzes its reasonableness. The fourth part is about the legal perfection of bona fide acquisition of stolen goods. The article mainly from the legislative and judicial aspects of perfection, we can legislate provisions on the acquisition of stolen goods in good faith, as well as in the judicial introduction of corresponding judicial interpretation, that is, referring to the provisions on lost property to deal with the problem of stolen goods, And draw lessons from the open market principle of foreign countries, at the same time, the article also stipulated the problem of the reply of stolen goods.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.2
本文編號(hào)：2317393
[Abstract]:Bona fide acquisition is a very important legal system in the civil law of various countries. In our country's Real right Law, there are clear provisions on bona fide acquisition, but there is no provision as to whether bona fide acquisition can be applied to stolen goods. From the draft of the Real right Law, we can see that the relevant scholars have raised this problem, but they have not seen it in the official Law of Real right, which is a very regrettable thing. The essence of bona fide acquisition is to sacrifice the ownership of property in order to ensure the smooth progress of the dynamic transaction. Whether the bona fide acquisition can be applied to the stolen goods is a trade-off between the interests of the original owner and the bona fide third party, and the correct handling of the relationship between the two is the premise of whether the stolen goods can be applied to the bona fide acquisition. This paper discusses the bona fide acquisition of stolen goods, the article is divided into four parts. The first part mainly describes the relevant theoretical issues of bona fide acquisition of stolen goods. Firstly, the theory of bona fide acquisition is introduced; secondly, the concept of stolen goods is defined, the characteristics and properties of stolen goods are analyzed, and the distinction between possession entrustment and possession separation is made. The second part mainly describes how the foreign and Taiwan laws regulate the bona fide acquisition of stolen goods. There are three main points of view about bona fide acquisition of stolen goods in foreign countries, that is, complete application, complete inapplicability and conditional application, and the reasons why countries adopt different systems are also analyzed in this paper. The third part mainly introduces the legislation evaluation of bona fide acquisition of stolen goods in China. Scholars have different views on this issue. Through the analysis of various viewpoints, the author finally thinks that it is reasonable to apply the idea of obtaining stolen goods in good faith under conditions, and analyzes its reasonableness. The fourth part is about the legal perfection of bona fide acquisition of stolen goods. The article mainly from the legislative and judicial aspects of perfection, we can legislate provisions on the acquisition of stolen goods in good faith, as well as in the judicial introduction of corresponding judicial interpretation, that is, referring to the provisions on lost property to deal with the problem of stolen goods, And draw lessons from the open market principle of foreign countries, at the same time, the article also stipulated the problem of the reply of stolen goods.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 趙石麟;關(guān)于贓物適用善意取得制度的思考[J];江蘇公安專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2001年06期
2 劉傳山,王春燕;論贓物的善意取得[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期
3 鄒立言;淺論贓物是否適用善意取得制度[J];理論界;2005年04期
4 張陽(yáng);對(duì)“窩藏、轉(zhuǎn)移、收購(gòu)、銷(xiāo)售贓物罪”的再認(rèn)識(shí)[J];吉林公安高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期
5 陶成;善意取得若干問(wèn)題探討[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)家;2005年01期
6 肖中華;李章岐;;贓物犯罪若干問(wèn)題研究[J];法治論叢;2006年05期
，本文編號(hào)：2317393
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2317393.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著
