【摘要】：被遺忘權(quán)的確立肇始他國,目的在于賦予自然人在網(wǎng)絡(luò)領(lǐng)域?qū)�(gè)人信息的自決權(quán)利。歐盟的“被遺忘權(quán)第一案”與我國的“被遺忘權(quán)第一案”存在差異性,我國案件中原告當(dāng)事人的敗訴不能否定我國確立被遺忘權(quán)的必要性。該項(xiàng)權(quán)利具有人格權(quán)屬性,應(yīng)屬于個(gè)人信息權(quán)中的一項(xiàng)權(quán)利內(nèi)容,它不同于人格權(quán)中的隱私權(quán)和名譽(yù)權(quán)。在網(wǎng)絡(luò)重要性日趨提高的大數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)代背景下,網(wǎng)絡(luò)用戶與網(wǎng)絡(luò)公司的實(shí)力相差懸殊,自然人對于其個(gè)人信息在網(wǎng)絡(luò)領(lǐng)域“被遺忘”的安全保護(hù)需求漸漸涌現(xiàn)。但我國近些年的規(guī)范性文件對自然人個(gè)人信息“被遺忘”的保護(hù)規(guī)定不夠全面,已有網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者采取的相關(guān)實(shí)踐做法有待完善。因此,我國有必要確立被遺忘權(quán),通過刪除的方式保護(hù)自然人的個(gè)人信息。對于被遺忘權(quán)保護(hù)制度的建構(gòu)應(yīng)明確該權(quán)利構(gòu)造,包括權(quán)利主體、義務(wù)主體和權(quán)利的行使,注意權(quán)利的適用范圍,并與《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》相銜接,保護(hù)自然人的被遺忘權(quán)。
[Abstract]:The establishment of the right to be forgotten begins in other countries, in order to give natural persons the right to self-determination of personal information in the field of network. There are differences between the first case of the right to be forgotten in the EU and the first case of the right to be forgotten in China. The failure of the plaintiff in the case of our country cannot negate the necessity of establishing the right to be forgotten in our country. This right has the attribute of personality right and should belong to the content of the right of personal information, which is different from the right of privacy and reputation in personality right. Under the background of big data, where the importance of network is increasing day by day, the strength of network users and network companies is far from equal, and the security protection needs of natural persons for their personal information are gradually emerging in the field of network. However, in recent years, the regulations on the protection of personal information of natural persons "forgotten" in the normative documents of our country are not comprehensive enough, and the relevant practices adopted by network service providers need to be improved. Therefore, it is necessary to establish the right to be forgotten and protect the personal information of natural persons by deleting it. The construction of the protection system of the right to be forgotten should be made clear, including the subject of right, the subject of obligation and the exercise of right, pay attention to the scope of application of right, and link up with the Law of Tort liability to protect the right of oblivion of natural person.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王春暉;;《網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全法》六大法律制度解析[J];南京郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2017年01期

2 張里安;韓旭至;;“被遺忘權(quán)”:大數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)代下的新問題[J];河北法學(xué);2017年03期

3 廖磊;;搜索引擎服務(wù)商的個(gè)人信息保護(hù)義務(wù)研究——以被遺忘權(quán)為中心[J];河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2017年01期

4 田新月;;歐盟《一般數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)條例》新規(guī)則評析[J];武大國際法評論;2016年02期

5 張建文;李倩;;被遺忘權(quán)的保護(hù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究——以我國“被遺忘權(quán)第一案”為中心[J];晉陽學(xué)刊;2016年06期

6 萬方;;終將被遺忘的權(quán)利——我國引入被遺忘權(quán)的思考[J];法學(xué)評論;2016年06期

7 趙銳;;被遺忘權(quán):理性評判與法律構(gòu)造[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年05期

8 王融;;《歐盟數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)通用條例》詳解[J];大數(shù)據(jù);2016年04期

9 張建文;高完成;;被遺忘權(quán)的本體論及本土化研究[J];吉首大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年03期

10 張恩典;;大數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)代的被遺忘權(quán)之爭[J];學(xué)習(xí)與探索;2016年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 高健;文海宣;;法院審結(jié)全國首例“被遺忘權(quán)”案[N];北京日報(bào);2016年

，

本文編號：2301677