【摘要】：在我國,無論從法律還是道德層面都認(rèn)定未成年子女的首選監(jiān)護人就是其父母。作為監(jiān)護人,父母對其未成年子女的人身和財產(chǎn)等合法權(quán)益負(fù)有保護的義務(wù)。但當(dāng)父母實施了侵害未成年子女的合法權(quán)益的行為或者父母不履行其對未成年子女監(jiān)護職責(zé)時,未成年人的合法權(quán)益如何保障就成為了一個社會普遍關(guān)注的問題。父母監(jiān)護權(quán)撤銷制度是未成年子女監(jiān)護制度的重要內(nèi)容,在防止父母權(quán)利濫用,維護未成年子女合法權(quán)益方面具有重要的意義。本文通過對我國未成年人父母監(jiān)護權(quán)撤銷制度立法現(xiàn)狀、真實案例、域外成熟制度的考察,發(fā)現(xiàn)現(xiàn)階段我國未成年人父母監(jiān)護權(quán)撤銷制度存在的不足之處,由此對完善未成年人父母監(jiān)護權(quán)撤銷制度提出建設(shè)性意見。從結(jié)構(gòu)上看,本文分為四個部分:第一部分是對于父母監(jiān)護權(quán)撤銷制度中涉及的相關(guān)概念的闡述,包括父母監(jiān)護權(quán)的含義、父母監(jiān)護權(quán)撤銷制度的含義、條件、存在價值和功能,從理論角度論述建立父母監(jiān)護權(quán)撤銷制度的必要性和意義。第二部分是父母監(jiān)護權(quán)撤銷制度的域外考察,通過考察包括美國、德國、法國、日本以及我國港澳臺地區(qū)的成熟制度,學(xué)習(xí)先進經(jīng)驗,對我國未成年人父母監(jiān)護權(quán)制度的建立和完善提供借鑒。第三部分,一方面考察我國現(xiàn)階段有關(guān)父母監(jiān)護權(quán)撤銷制度的立法現(xiàn)狀,分析當(dāng)前我國撤銷父母監(jiān)護權(quán)制度的立法方面存在的缺陷;另一方面考察國內(nèi)已有的撤銷父母監(jiān)護權(quán)的真實案例,分析當(dāng)前我國撤銷父母監(jiān)護權(quán)的相關(guān)配套政策的不足。第四部分,以未成年人利益最大化原則為出發(fā)點和落腳點,立足我國的基本國情,提出完善該制度的具體建議,包括立法、司法和行政層面的相關(guān)措施,為完善我國的法律體系貢獻自己的力量。
[Abstract]:In our country, parents are the preferred guardian of minor children in both legal and moral aspects. As guardians, parents have a duty to protect the rights and interests of their minor children. However, how to protect the legitimate rights and interests of minors becomes a universal concern when parents act against the legitimate rights and interests of minor children or when parents do not perform their duties of guardianship of minor children. The revocation system of parental custody is an important part of the custody system of minor children, which is of great significance in preventing the abuse of parental rights and safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of minor children. Based on the investigation of the current legislation, real cases and mature system of parental custody of minors in China, this paper finds out the deficiencies of the revocation system of parental custody of minors in China at this stage. Therefore, constructive suggestions are put forward to improve the revocation system of parental custody of minors. In terms of structure, this paper is divided into four parts: the first part is about the related concepts of parental custody revocation system, including the meaning of parental custody, the meaning of parental custody revocation system, conditions, This paper discusses the necessity and significance of establishing parental custody revocation system from the angle of theory. The second part is the extraterritorial investigation of the revocation system of parental custody. It includes the mature systems of the United States, Germany, France, Japan and China's Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan regions to learn advanced experience. To provide reference for the establishment and perfection of the system of parental custody of minors in China. The third part, on the one hand, examines the current legislative situation of the revocation system of parental custody in China, and analyzes the defects of the current legislation on the revocation of parental custody system in China; On the other hand, this paper investigates the real cases of abolishing parental custody in China, and analyzes the deficiencies of the relevant supporting policies of cancelling parental custody in China. The fourth part, taking the principle of maximization of the interests of minors as the starting point and foothold, based on the basic national conditions of our country, puts forward specific suggestions to improve the system, including the relevant measures at the legislative, judicial and administrative levels. To perfect our country's legal system contribution own strength.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 金眉;;未成年人父母的監(jiān)護人資格撤銷制度比較研究[J];南京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)·人文科學(xué)·社會科學(xué));2016年06期

2 彭森磊;;淺析不合格父母監(jiān)護權(quán)撤銷制度的現(xiàn)實困境與立法完善[J];青少年學(xué)刊;2016年05期

3 汪曼喬;;撤銷監(jiān)護權(quán)后未成年人權(quán)益后續(xù)保障問題研究——從徐州撤銷監(jiān)護權(quán)案談起[J];預(yù)防青少年犯罪研究;2016年01期

4 徐婧;戴玉欣;;芻議不適格父母監(jiān)護權(quán)的撤銷與后續(xù)保障——以全國首例民政部門申請剝奪監(jiān)護權(quán)案為研究范本[J];法制博覽;2016年04期

5 ;撤銷監(jiān)護權(quán)僅是難度不小的第一步——佟麗華談首例夫妻間撤銷監(jiān)護權(quán)訴訟案[J];中國民政;2015年18期

6 李云波;;“單位”在監(jiān)護制度中的角色轉(zhuǎn)變[J];青少年犯罪問題;2015年05期

7 佟麗華;;監(jiān)護侵害處理意見:激活“沉睡的制度”[J];中國青年社會科學(xué);2015年05期

8 王牧;姬廣勇;高晶;;民政局可申請撤銷未成年人父母的監(jiān)護權(quán)并成為監(jiān)護人[J];人民司法;2015年14期

9 彭剛;;剝奪與回歸:我國未成年人監(jiān)護權(quán)撤銷制度的建構(gòu)機理及其完善[J];寧夏社會科學(xué);2015年04期

10 陳志軍;;未成年人監(jiān)護制度的完善[J];山西省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2015年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 廖強強;試論我國未成年人監(jiān)護制度的完善[D];暨南大學(xué);2015年

2 王坤;論監(jiān)護監(jiān)督制度[D];吉林大學(xué);2014年

3 王鑫;我國未成年人監(jiān)護制度的不足及其完善研究[D];上海大學(xué);2013年

4 劉偉;親權(quán)濫用法律問題研究[D];山東大學(xué);2013年

5 李澄路;國家責(zé)任視野下未成年人監(jiān)護權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)移研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2012年

6 薛永松;中美未成年人監(jiān)護制度比較研究[D];山東大學(xué);2006年

7 宮穎;論監(jiān)護制度的立法完善[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2000年

，

本文編號：2284276