發(fā)布時間：2018-10-17 20:18

【摘要】：互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)的發(fā)展,將我們帶到一個網(wǎng)絡(luò)交織的世界,使許多作品產(chǎn)生了一種全新的傳播途徑,沖擊著傳統(tǒng)法律所構(gòu)建的著作權(quán)保護(hù)制度。面對近年來愈發(fā)嚴(yán)峻的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)侵權(quán)行為的發(fā)生,如何規(guī)范作品在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)上的傳播行為,進(jìn)而有效維護(hù)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)人及相關(guān)權(quán)利人的權(quán)利,成為當(dāng)前立法、司法亟需解決的重大問題。當(dāng)前針對著作權(quán)中的信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播侵權(quán)行為大量發(fā)生,為了回應(yīng)現(xiàn)實(shí)的需要,我國《著作權(quán)法》在2001年10月修訂中明確提出了“信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)”的概念,使信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的保護(hù)提到了前所未有的高度。不足的是此次修訂僅僅對《著作權(quán)法》進(jìn)行的局部微調(diào),對這項(xiàng)權(quán)利的定義、概念和適用范圍并不明確,導(dǎo)致法院在適用法律解決糾紛的過程中舉步維艱,難以適從。鑒于此,為彌補(bǔ)《著作權(quán)法》的不足和漏洞,國務(wù)院在2006年7月制定了《信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護(hù)條例》(以下簡稱《保護(hù)條例》)。從規(guī)范的內(nèi)容來看,該部法律結(jié)合各國最新的立法規(guī)定,較為詳盡的規(guī)定了信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的各項(xiàng)保護(hù)制度。但仍然存在前瞻性不足、利益的平衡化衡量不足和主動性不足等缺陷,2013年1月30日國務(wù)院又作出了修訂《保護(hù)條例》的決定,2013年1月1日正式施行的《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理侵害信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)民事糾紛案件適用法律若干問題的規(guī)定》(以下簡稱《若干問題的規(guī)定》),信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護(hù)制度一直處于不斷完善之中。本文將按照如下邏輯順序進(jìn)行論證。首先介紹信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的概念、特點(diǎn)及立法概況,并通過信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的規(guī)定引申出信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為的概念、劃分。信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為按照主體的不同進(jìn)行劃分,分為作品等內(nèi)容提供行為和網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供行為,在此基礎(chǔ)上將作品內(nèi)容提供行為構(gòu)成的侵權(quán)稱為直接侵權(quán),將網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供的侵權(quán)行為稱為間接侵權(quán),并依據(jù)侵權(quán)行為的不同按照不同的歸責(zé)原則進(jìn)行處理。再次,分析信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播侵權(quán)的例外,包括了合理使用、法定許可、默示許可及“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則。最后,針對現(xiàn)有信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護(hù)制度的不足提出完善建議:完善信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)侵權(quán)制度的歸責(zé)原則、區(qū)分信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播侵權(quán)責(zé)任與侵權(quán)賠償責(zé)任、應(yīng)當(dāng)明確網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)侵權(quán)的賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
[Abstract]:The development of Internet technology brings us to a world of intertwined networks, and makes many works produce a new way of dissemination, which impacts the copyright protection system constructed by the traditional law. In the face of the increasingly serious Internet tort in recent years, how to regulate the dissemination of works on the Internet, and then effectively protect the rights of copyright owners and related rights holders under the Internet environment, has become the current legislation. A major problem in the administration of justice that needs to be solved. In view of the large number of infringing acts of information network communication in copyright, in order to respond to the need of reality, the concept of "information network communication right" was clearly put forward in the revision of our country's copyright Law in October 2001. So that the protection of the right to information network communication has been raised to an unprecedented height. What is insufficient is that this amendment only makes some minor adjustments to the copyright Law, and the definition, concept and scope of application of this right are not clear, resulting in the courts struggling in the process of applying the law to settle disputes, and it is difficult to adapt to it. In view of this, in order to remedy the shortcomings and loopholes of the copyright Law, the State Council formulated the regulations on the Protection of the right of Information Communication in July 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the "regulations of Protection"). From the normative content, the Ministry of Law combined with the latest legislative provisions of various countries, more detailed provisions of the right to information network transmission of the protection of the system. But there is still a lack of foresight. On January 30, 2013, the State Council again made a decision to amend the regulations on Protection. The Supreme people's Court on the trial of the Information Network on infringement, which came into effect on January 1, 2013, was formally implemented. The provisions on the Application of Law in the Civil dispute cases of the right of Network Communication > (hereinafter referred to as "the provisions of several problems"), the system of protection of the right of communication of information network has always been in the process of being perfected. This article will demonstrate in the following logical order. Firstly, this paper introduces the concept, characteristics and legislation of the right of information network communication, and deduces the concept and division of the behavior of information network communication through the regulation of the right of information network communication. According to the different subjects, the information network communication behavior is divided into the content providing behavior and the network service providing behavior. On this basis, the infringement of the work content providing behavior is called direct infringement. The tort provided by network service is called indirect tort and is treated according to different imputation principle. Thirdly, this paper analyzes the exceptions to the infringement of information network communication, including reasonable use, legal permission, implied permission and "safe haven" rules. Finally, in view of the deficiency of the existing information network communication right protection system, the paper puts forward some suggestions: perfecting the imputation principle of the information network communication right infringement system, distinguishing the information network communication tort liability from the tort compensation liability. The standard of compensation for infringement of network communication right should be defined.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 孔祥俊;;論信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為[J];人民司法;2012年07期

2 陳錦川;;信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為的法律認(rèn)定[J];人民司法;2012年05期

3 張榮勤;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)淺析[J];邊疆經(jīng)濟(jì)與文化;2011年02期

4 楊靜;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)定時播放視頻行為的司法認(rèn)定探究[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年04期

5 劉軍華;;論“通過計算機(jī)網(wǎng)絡(luò)定時播放作品”行為的權(quán)利屬性與侵權(quán)之法律適用——兼論傳播權(quán)立法之完善[J];東方法學(xué);2009年01期

6 梁志文;;信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的謎思與界定[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2008年04期

7 王遷;;論“網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為”的界定及其侵權(quán)認(rèn)定[J];法學(xué);2006年05期

8 鄭成思;兩個新的國際版權(quán)條約評介[J];外國法譯評;1997年04期

，

本文編號：2277839