【摘要】：全球經(jīng)濟一體化加速了商貿(mào)往來,在促進經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的同時,涉外民商事案件中違約責(zé)任和侵權(quán)責(zé)任競合現(xiàn)象也相伴而生。因此,研究涉外違約責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任競合問題的處理,不但具有重要的理論意義,也具有重要的實踐作用,有助于我國當事人更好地防范和化解法律風(fēng)險,維護自身合法權(quán)益。本文以民事責(zé)任競合理論為切入點,對涉外違約責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任競合案件進行具體解決路徑的闡述。全文共分為四章。第一章以違約責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任競合的基本定義及原因、特征和情形為切入點,介紹相關(guān)國家的主要學(xué)說及各自利弊分析。第二章通過介紹識別的基本概念及涉外競合案件的識別依據(jù),進而闡述了世界各國對該類競合案件的識別方式,并對我國相關(guān)識別制度與司法實踐進行總結(jié)。第三章由涉外責(zé)任競合案件管轄權(quán)的確定入手,分析了在責(zé)任競合情況下的管轄權(quán)沖突表現(xiàn)形態(tài)及各國相關(guān)解決方法,最后介紹我國對該類案件的管轄規(guī)定及司法實踐。第四章重點介紹了該類案件的法律適用。從違約與侵權(quán)兩類案件適用的比較說開,介紹了國際民事責(zé)任競合的法律選擇原則及法律適用情況。
[Abstract]:The global economic integration accelerates the trade and trade, while promoting the economic development, the phenomenon of concurrence of breach of contract liability and tort liability in foreign civil and commercial cases also comes into being. Therefore, it is not only of great theoretical significance, but also of important practical function to study the handling of the concurrence of foreign breach liability and tort liability, which is helpful to prevent and defuse the legal risks and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the parties in our country. This article takes the civil liability concurrence theory as the breakthrough point, carries on the concrete solution path to the foreign-related breach of contract liability and the tort liability concurrence case. The full text is divided into four chapters. The first chapter introduces the main theories of relevant countries and their respective advantages and disadvantages, starting with the basic definition and reasons, characteristics and circumstances of the concurrence between liability for breach of contract and liability for tort. The second chapter introduces the basic concept of identification and the identification basis of foreign cases, and then expounds the identification of this kind of cases in the world, and summarizes the relevant identification system and judicial practice in China. The third chapter begins with the determination of jurisdiction in the case of concurrence of foreign liabilities, analyzes the form of jurisdiction conflict in the case of concurrent liability and the relevant solutions of various countries, and finally introduces the jurisdiction regulations and judicial practice of this kind of cases in our country. The fourth chapter focuses on the legal application of this kind of cases. From the comparison of the application of breach of contract and tort, this paper introduces the principle of law selection and the application of law in international civil liability concurrence.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.6

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 裘曉音;責(zé)任競合及其解決機制[J];人民司法;2001年10期

2 高魯軍,李迎春;侵權(quán)責(zé)任和違約責(zé)任競合之管轄權(quán)確定——構(gòu)建責(zé)任競合時管轄權(quán)確定的模式[J];山東審判;2005年04期

3 羅方方;徐娜;;我國侵權(quán)責(zé)任和違約責(zé)任競合之選擇[J];商業(yè)文化(上半月);2011年06期

4 李海龍;;論責(zé)任競合、聚合與抗辯[J];現(xiàn)代物業(yè)(中旬刊);2012年04期

5 黃云霞;違約與侵權(quán)責(zé)任的競合[J];山西省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2000年01期

6 邱房貴;論產(chǎn)品責(zé)任競合[J];學(xué)術(shù)論壇;2001年04期

7 彭金發(fā),張再芝;論《合同法》中責(zé)任競合規(guī)則[J];江西社會科學(xué);2003年07期

8 肖磊,祝平衡;試論行政責(zé)任競合[J];衡陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué));2004年01期

9 曹冬子;;我國現(xiàn)行責(zé)任競合規(guī)定的不足與建議[J];科協(xié)論壇(下半月);2008年05期

10 傅巍;;論侵權(quán)責(zé)任與違約責(zé)任競合[J];法制與社會;2008年27期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 沈暉;;違約責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任競合探析[A];中國民商法實務(wù)論壇論文集[C];2001年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 張錦武;淺談責(zé)任競合[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟報;2003年

2 吳U，

本文編號：2265047