ISP間接侵犯信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)認定研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-09-19 07:42
【摘要】：伴隨互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)的飛速發(fā)展,信息的傳播方式、傳播范圍以及傳播速度都發(fā)生了質(zhì)的飛躍,信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)的傳播帶給社會公眾前所未有的便捷體驗,同時,網(wǎng)絡(luò)是把雙刃劍,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)案件也逐年增多,從世界范圍內(nèi)看,信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)受侵犯的案件更是著作權(quán)侵權(quán)案件的高發(fā)領(lǐng)域。在司法實踐中,對ISP(網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者)侵犯著作權(quán)認定時往往會出現(xiàn)類似案件卻不同裁判的情形,究其原因是各地法院在對間接侵犯信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的認定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)上未達成一致,而我國現(xiàn)行的立法中也未明確統(tǒng)一這種認定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。此時,在具體認定時給予了法官較大的自由裁量權(quán),法官在裁判時考慮認定因素的角度不同,理解認定因素的深度也不同,為防止法官的自由裁量權(quán)過大,或者為解決一些法院在認定時存在僵化適用法律條文的問題,本文據(jù)此通過分五個部分對ISP間接侵權(quán)的認定問題進行探究。本文第一部分是對一些基礎(chǔ)概念進行界定,主要涵蓋對ISP、信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)以及間接侵權(quán)行為進行界定,這些基礎(chǔ)概念在學(xué)術(shù)界的界定仍存在爭議,筆者在此也談及了自己的不同理解;在理清基本概念的基礎(chǔ)上本文第二部分通過對間接侵犯信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)相關(guān)案例的分析,探究其爭議焦點,并引出本文所探究的"認定"問題。本文的第三部分則是對認定問題國內(nèi)外立法現(xiàn)狀的比較研究,眾所周知,很多國家的《著作權(quán)法》都起源于或借鑒了美國的DMCA,本文通過對中美有關(guān)ISP間接侵權(quán)認定的立法現(xiàn)狀比較,引出本文第四部分的內(nèi)容,第四部分在第三部分的基礎(chǔ)上指出了當(dāng)前我國立法中對認定問題存在的不足之處,并進行了深入分析,最后一部分內(nèi)容則是針對前文指出的不足之處,提出了一些針對性的完善建議,主要從"注意義務(wù)"認定的完善、"應(yīng)知"問題的認定完善、替代責(zé)任與教唆侵權(quán)認定的完善這三個角度進行探討。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of Internet technology, the way, scope and speed of information dissemination have made a qualitative leap. The communication of information network brings the social public unprecedented convenient experience. At the same time, the network is a double-edged sword. Internet copyright infringement cases are also increasing year by year. From a worldwide perspective, the infringement of information network transmission rights is the high incidence of copyright infringement cases. In judicial practice, similar cases often occur when ISP (network service provider) infringes on copyright. The reason is that local courts do not agree on the standard of indirect infringement of information network communication right. But our country's current legislation also does not clearly unify this kind of confirmation standard. At this time, the judge is given greater discretion in the specific determination, the judge considers the determination factor in different angles, the depth of understanding the determination factor is also different, in order to prevent the judge's discretion is too large, Or in order to solve some courts in the determination of rigid application of legal provisions, this article through the five parts of the ISP indirect infringement of the problem to explore. The first part of this paper is to define some basic concepts, which mainly cover the definition of ISP, information network communication right and indirect tort, which are still controversial in academic circles. On the basis of clarifying the basic concepts, the second part of this paper explores the focus of the controversy by analyzing the cases of indirect infringement of information network communication right. And leads to this article to explore the issue of "cognizance". The third part of this paper is a comparative study of the status quo of legislation at home and abroad on the issue of cognizance, which is well known to all. The copyright Law of many countries originates from or draws lessons from the DMCA, of the United States. The fourth part of this paper is based on the comparison of the legislation status quo of the indirect infringement of ISP between China and the United States. The fourth part in the third part of the basis of pointing out the current legislation of our country to identify the shortcomings of the problem, and in-depth analysis, the last part of the content is pointed out in the above deficiencies, Some suggestions are put forward, mainly from the three angles of "duty of care", "should know", substitute responsibility and abetting tort.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.41
本文編號：2249479
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of Internet technology, the way, scope and speed of information dissemination have made a qualitative leap. The communication of information network brings the social public unprecedented convenient experience. At the same time, the network is a double-edged sword. Internet copyright infringement cases are also increasing year by year. From a worldwide perspective, the infringement of information network transmission rights is the high incidence of copyright infringement cases. In judicial practice, similar cases often occur when ISP (network service provider) infringes on copyright. The reason is that local courts do not agree on the standard of indirect infringement of information network communication right. But our country's current legislation also does not clearly unify this kind of confirmation standard. At this time, the judge is given greater discretion in the specific determination, the judge considers the determination factor in different angles, the depth of understanding the determination factor is also different, in order to prevent the judge's discretion is too large, Or in order to solve some courts in the determination of rigid application of legal provisions, this article through the five parts of the ISP indirect infringement of the problem to explore. The first part of this paper is to define some basic concepts, which mainly cover the definition of ISP, information network communication right and indirect tort, which are still controversial in academic circles. On the basis of clarifying the basic concepts, the second part of this paper explores the focus of the controversy by analyzing the cases of indirect infringement of information network communication right. And leads to this article to explore the issue of "cognizance". The third part of this paper is a comparative study of the status quo of legislation at home and abroad on the issue of cognizance, which is well known to all. The copyright Law of many countries originates from or draws lessons from the DMCA, of the United States. The fourth part of this paper is based on the comparison of the legislation status quo of the indirect infringement of ISP between China and the United States. The fourth part in the third part of the basis of pointing out the current legislation of our country to identify the shortcomings of the problem, and in-depth analysis, the last part of the content is pointed out in the above deficiencies, Some suggestions are put forward, mainly from the three angles of "duty of care", "should know", substitute responsibility and abetting tort.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.41
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 芮松艷;;信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的理解適用與第三次《著作權(quán)法》修改 以國際公約及司法實踐為視角[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2013年Z1期
2 陳錦川;;關(guān)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)審判實務(wù)中幾個問題的探討[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年06期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 裴曉萌;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者侵權(quán)責(zé)任的成立與承擔(dān)[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年
，本文編號：2249479
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2249479.html
最近更新
教材專著
