【摘要】：訴訟時(shí)效的價(jià)值功能在于限制對債權(quán)人權(quán)利行使的期限,保障與債務(wù)人交易的不特定第三人債權(quán)信用。訴訟時(shí)效的這一價(jià)值功能,決定了訴訟時(shí)效的客體僅局限于具有財(cái)產(chǎn)給付內(nèi)容的債權(quán)請求權(quán),所有的物權(quán)請求權(quán)均不適用訴訟時(shí)效�！睹穹ǹ倓t(草案)》(征求意見稿)訴訟時(shí)效的設(shè)置,破壞了"民法典總則貫穿于分則"的體系化邏輯,也與法律適用清晰化的要求相悖。鑒于訴訟時(shí)效僅適用債權(quán)請求權(quán),宜將訴訟時(shí)效規(guī)定在民法典債法總則部分。唯如此安排訴訟時(shí)效,才符合民法典編纂的體系化要求,確保司法審判中訴訟時(shí)效的準(zhǔn)確適用。
[Abstract]:The value function of the statute of limitations is to limit the time limit for the exercise of creditor's rights, and to protect the credit of the creditor's rights of the third party that does not deal with the debtor. This value function of limitation of action determines that the object of limitation of action is limited to the claim right of creditor's rights with the content of property payment. The prescription of action is not applicable to all the right of claim in real right. The setting of the limitation of action under the General principles of Civil Law (draft) > (draft for opinions) undermines the systematization logic of the General principles of Civil Code running through the specific provisions and runs counter to the requirement of clarity in the application of law. Since the limitation of action is only applicable to the claim of creditor's rights, the limitation of action should be stipulated in the part of the general principles of the Civil Code of obligation. Only when the statute of limitations is arranged in this way can it accord with the systematic requirement of codification of the civil code and ensure the accurate application of the statute of limitations in the judicial trial.
【作者單位】： 南昌大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：江西省高校人文社科資助項(xiàng)目“訴訟時(shí)效制度研究”(FX1135)
【分類號】：D923.1
，

本文編號：2227810