【摘要】：在侵權(quán)責(zé)任法中,“侵權(quán)責(zé)任形態(tài)”是一個(gè)基本的概念,它回答的是侵權(quán)責(zé)任由誰承擔(dān),如何承擔(dān)的問題�！扒謾�(quán)責(zé)任形態(tài)”的一種分類是單獨(dú)責(zé)任和共同責(zé)任,其中共同責(zé)任是指由兩個(gè)以上責(zé)任人依照法定方式共同對(duì)被害人承擔(dān)責(zé)任。通說認(rèn)為共同責(zé)任可分為四種,即按份責(zé)任、連帶責(zé)任、不真正連帶責(zé)任和補(bǔ)充責(zé)任,可知,通說把補(bǔ)充責(zé)任列為與前三種責(zé)任并列的一種獨(dú)立的新型責(zé)任形態(tài)。但亦有學(xué)者不認(rèn)同上述觀點(diǎn)。學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)補(bǔ)充責(zé)任的內(nèi)涵和外延的不同理解導(dǎo)致了補(bǔ)充責(zé)任適用范圍存在較大爭(zhēng)議。針對(duì)上述爭(zhēng)議,筆者通過回顧國(guó)內(nèi)補(bǔ)充責(zé)任的理論、立法和司法實(shí)踐發(fā)展歷程和現(xiàn)狀,對(duì)比國(guó)外的補(bǔ)充責(zé)任理論類似學(xué)說、立法和司法實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn),對(duì)補(bǔ)充責(zé)任給予厘清和再定義。本文采用比較研究分析法、案例分析法和歷史研究法,以補(bǔ)充責(zé)任適用范圍的擴(kuò)張和限制為視角,對(duì)其適用范圍進(jìn)行再探討并最終得出自己的結(jié)論。
[Abstract]:In the law of tort liability, the form of tort liability is a basic concept, which answers the question of who bears the tort liability and how to bear it. One kind of classification of "tort liability form" is individual responsibility and common responsibility, in which joint responsibility refers to two or more persons responsible for the joint responsibility to the victim in accordance with the legal means. The general theory holds that the common responsibility can be divided into four kinds, that is, the shared responsibility, the joint liability, the untrue joint and several liability and the supplementary responsibility, which can be seen as an independent new type of responsibility which is juxtaposed with the former three kinds of responsibilities. However, some scholars do not agree with the above views. The different understanding of the connotation and extension of supplementary liability in academic circles leads to the controversy of the scope of application of supplementary liability. In view of the above disputes, the author reviews the theory of supplementary liability, the development of legislation and judicial practice and the present situation, and compares the similar theories, legislation and judicial practice experience of foreign complementary liability theory. Clarify and redefine supplementary responsibilities. This paper uses comparative research method, case analysis method and historical research method, from the angle of view of the expansion and limitation of the scope of application of supplementary liability, discusses its scope of application again and finally draws its own conclusion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 李永軍;;論《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》關(guān)于多數(shù)加害人的責(zé)任承擔(dān)方式[J];法學(xué)論壇;2010年02期

2 張民安;;人的安全保障義務(wù)理論研究 兼評(píng)《關(guān)于審理人身損害賠償案件適用法律若干問題的解釋》第6條[J];中外法學(xué);2006年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2212708