【摘要】：在市場經(jīng)濟繁榮發(fā)展的今天,代理以其高效快捷性而被人們廣泛應用,表見代理作為代理中一重要部分,在保護善意第三人利益,維護市場交易順利進行等方面起到了重要作用。然而,關于表見代理構成要件的組成的爭論一直沒有停止。本文認為,在本人對代理權權利外觀的產(chǎn)生沒有任何可歸責性的情況下,不應構成表見代理,那么由本人承擔簽訂合同所導致的不利后果是不合理的,所以應當將本人具有可歸責性應該納入表見代理構成要件的考量范圍。除摘要和結語外,本文共分為五個部分:第一部分由表見代理研究現(xiàn)狀入手,重點論述我國表見代理的研究現(xiàn)狀,司法現(xiàn)狀以及法律規(guī)定的缺陷。同時就理論界主要存在幾種學說“單一要件說”、“雙重要件說”等進行論述。分析兩種學說的優(yōu)劣,提出將本人可歸責性納入表見代理的必要性。第二部分確定本人可歸責性的討論基礎,從過錯責任和無過錯責任的一般理論出發(fā),結合可歸責性進行具體情況的分析,論述可歸責性是本人承擔責任的正當化依據(jù)。第三部分圍繞善意取得與表見代理的對本人行為要求的不同以及法律后果的不同進行比較分析,提出在本人可歸責性納入表見代理更為迫切也更為合理。第四部分論述本人可歸責性的判定,從“誘因原則”、“合理信賴原則”“風險分配原則”這三個原則入手,重點論述了風險分配與可歸責性的具體判斷和本人可歸責性的行為樣態(tài)。第五部分主要講述了關于表見代理本人可歸責性中的“風險原則”證明責任分配問題。本文對證明責任分配進行了詳細論述,解決了司法實踐中加重第三人舉證負擔等問題。
[Abstract]:Today, with the prosperous development of market economy, agency is widely used by people because of its high efficiency and rapidity. As an important part of agency, agency is protecting the interests of bona fide third party. Maintain the smooth conduct of market transactions and other aspects played an important role. However, the debate on the composition of apparent agency has not stopped. This article holds that if I do not have any imputation to the appearance of the right of agency, it should not constitute an apparent agency, then it is unreasonable for me to bear the adverse consequences of signing the contract. Therefore, I should be imputable should be included in the scope of consideration. In addition to the summary and conclusion, this paper is divided into five parts: the first part begins with the present situation of apparent agency research, focusing on the current situation of our country's apparent agency research, judicial status and the defects of legal provisions. At the same time, there are several theories such as "single element theory" and "double element theory" in the theoretical circle. This paper analyzes the merits and demerits of the two theories, and puts forward the necessity of bringing personal imputation into apparent agency. The second part determines the basis of the discussion of imputability, starting from the general theory of fault liability and no-fault liability, combined with the analysis of specific circumstances of imputability, discusses that imputability is the legitimate basis for me to assume responsibility. In the third part, the author makes a comparative analysis on the differences of the behavior requirements and legal consequences between the bona fide acquisition and the apparent agency, and points out that it is more urgent and reasonable to include the apparent agent in the imputation of my own liability. The fourth part discusses the judgment of imputability, starting with the three principles of "inducement principle", "reasonable trust principle" and "risk distribution principle". The specific judgment of risk allocation and imputability and the behavior pattern of imputability are discussed. The fifth part mainly describes the allocation of burden of proof in the imputability of apparent agent. This paper discusses the distribution of burden of proof in detail and solves the problem of increasing the burden of proof of the third party in judicial practice.
【學位授予單位】：南昌大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 冉克平;;表見代理本人歸責性要件的反思與重構[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2016年01期

2 戴永盛;;論不動產(chǎn)冒名處分的法律適用[J];法學;2014年07期

3 王浩;;表見代理中的本人可歸責性問題研究[J];華東政法大學學報;2014年03期

4 葉金強;;表見代理中信賴合理性的判斷模式[J];比較法研究;2014年01期

5 劉曉華;;權利外觀責任的司法實現(xiàn)——以善意取得為視角[J];法學論壇;2013年04期

6 楊代雄;;表見代理的特別構成要件[J];法學;2013年02期

7 季秀平;;關于表見代理理解與適用的幾個疑難問題[J];學習論壇;2011年12期

8 夏嬌;;審判實踐中表見代理的認定[J];青年文學家;2011年21期

9 羅瑤;;法國表見代理構成要件研究——兼評我國《合同法》第49條[J];比較法研究;2011年04期

10 周凱;;表見代理制度的司法適用——以涉建設工程商事糾紛為對象的類型化研究[J];法律適用;2011年04期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 胡巧絨;舉證責任分配規(guī)則研究[D];復旦大學;2013年

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 許文苑;論表見代理構成要件之法律適用[D];華東政法大學;2016年

2 王媛媛;表見代理構成制度引入本人可歸責性因素問題研究[D];華中科技大學;2013年

，

本文編號：2197995