【摘要】：隨著技術(shù)創(chuàng)新速度加快,全球經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化程度加深,標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和專利作為技術(shù)推廣的重要手段,不可避免地結(jié)合在一起。然而帶有公益性的技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與私權(quán)性的專利權(quán)結(jié)合后,產(chǎn)生了“1+12”的市場(chǎng)效應(yīng),稍有不慎可能會(huì)形成新的技術(shù)壟斷,由此引發(fā)技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中必要專利相關(guān)問(wèn)題的研究。本文主要是對(duì)技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中必要專利問(wèn)題進(jìn)行研究和探索。第一部分是技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中必要專利的概述。主要介紹技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的概念,分析技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和專利技術(shù)結(jié)合的必然性,在此基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)外關(guān)于必要專利的定義,明確必要專利的概念,分析必要專利的特征,區(qū)分必要專利權(quán)利要求和必要專利。第二部分是技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中必要專利的認(rèn)定問(wèn)題。通過(guò)分析必要專利認(rèn)定的重要性,闡述技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中必要專利的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和認(rèn)定主體。主要從技術(shù)因素、法律因素和商業(yè)因素具體論述必要專利的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn),并且結(jié)合認(rèn)定中存在的問(wèn)題確定技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中必要專利的認(rèn)定主體。第三部分研究技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中必要專利存在的問(wèn)題。從必要專利的特點(diǎn)出發(fā),結(jié)合相關(guān)案例分析技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中必要專利存在的問(wèn)題及其原因,從而引出下文關(guān)于技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中必要專利的規(guī)制的討論。第四部分闡述技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中必要專利的主動(dòng)規(guī)制。結(jié)合技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中必要專利存在的問(wèn)題,從標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化組織的專利政策出發(fā),論述專利信息披露和FRAND許可原則。重點(diǎn)解讀FRAND許可原則,并對(duì)FRAND許可的法律性質(zhì)進(jìn)行分析。第五部分論述技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中必要專利的被動(dòng)規(guī)制。通過(guò)分析完全限制禁令救濟(jì)、完全不限制禁令救濟(jì)和有條件限制禁令救濟(jì)在標(biāo)準(zhǔn)必要專利糾紛案件中的運(yùn)用,從而探尋最適合解決必要專利糾紛的禁令救濟(jì)。重點(diǎn)闡述對(duì)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)必要專利的反壟斷規(guī)制,結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)外反壟斷的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中必要專利的壟斷行為特征,從技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)這一公共平臺(tái)的角度進(jìn)行綜合的法律價(jià)值判斷,制定適合標(biāo)準(zhǔn)必要專利的反壟斷措施。
[Abstract]:With the acceleration of technological innovation and the deepening of global economic integration, standards and patents, as an important means of technology promotion, are inevitably combined together. However, the combination of the technical standard with public welfare and the patent right of private right has produced the market effect of "112", which may form a new technology monopoly, which leads to the research of the necessary patent related problems in the technical standard. This paper is mainly about the research and exploration of the necessary patent in the technical standard. The first part is an overview of necessary patents in technical standards. This paper mainly introduces the concept of technical standard, analyzes the inevitability of the combination of technical standard and patent technology, and on this basis, with the definition of necessary patent at home and abroad, clarifies the concept of necessary patent, and analyzes the characteristics of necessary patent. Distinguish between essential patent claims and essential patents. The second part is the identification of necessary patents in technical standards. By analyzing the importance of necessary patent recognition, this paper expounds the identification standard and subject of necessary patent in technical standard. This paper mainly discusses the identification standards of necessary patents from technical factors, legal factors and commercial factors, and determines the main body of the necessary patents in technical standards in combination with the problems existing in the identification. The third part studies the problems of the necessary patent in the technical standard. Starting from the characteristics of necessary patents, this paper analyzes the problems and causes of necessary patents in technical standards by combining relevant cases, and then leads to the discussion on the regulation of necessary patents in technical standards below. The fourth part expounds the active regulation of the necessary patent in the technical standard. Combined with the problems of necessary patents in technical standards, this paper discusses the principles of patent information disclosure and FRAND licensing from the perspective of the patent policy of the Organization for Standardization. Focus on the interpretation of FRAND licensing principles, and the legal nature of FRAND licensing analysis. The fifth part discusses the passive regulation of necessary patents in technical standards. Based on the analysis of the application of complete restriction prohibition relief, no restriction ban relief and conditional prohibition relief in standard essential patent disputes, the author tries to find out the most suitable prohibition relief for resolving necessary patent disputes. This paper focuses on the anti-monopoly regulation of standard essential patents, combined with the anti-monopoly experience at home and abroad and the monopoly behavior characteristics of necessary patents in technical standards, and makes a comprehensive legal value judgment from the point of view of technical standards as a public platform. To formulate antitrust measures suitable for the necessary patents of the standard.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.42
，

本文編號(hào)：2195549