本文選題：后電影產(chǎn)業(yè) + 著作權(quán)　； 參考：《哈爾濱商業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：如今,電影經(jīng)濟(jì)已經(jīng)發(fā)展成為一項(xiàng)非常重要的經(jīng)濟(jì)與文化產(chǎn)業(yè),并逐漸形成了電影產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈。在整個(gè)大電影產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈中,電影的攝制、電影的發(fā)行和電影的影院放映屬于電影經(jīng)濟(jì)生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的上游,電影從影院下線后的各種商業(yè)性的開發(fā)利用活動(dòng)是電影經(jīng)濟(jì)生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的下游,該下游環(huán)節(jié)在我國(guó)被統(tǒng)稱為"后電影產(chǎn)業(yè)"。電影產(chǎn)業(yè)的上游和下游共同構(gòu)成了大電影產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈,下游部分即后電影產(chǎn)業(yè)中涉及版權(quán)保護(hù)問題的商業(yè)性開發(fā)利用形式可分為電影后產(chǎn)品和電影衍生品。相較于發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家,我國(guó)后電影產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展比較薄弱,市場(chǎng)潛力有待進(jìn)一步開發(fā),其中廣大消費(fèi)者缺乏版權(quán)保護(hù)意識(shí),以及絕大部分影視公司只重視票房,對(duì)電影下線后的商業(yè)化利用不足是造成我國(guó)后電影產(chǎn)業(yè)落后的重要原因�？v觀我國(guó)整個(gè)后電影產(chǎn)業(yè)市場(chǎng),盜版侵權(quán)問題無(wú)處不在,同時(shí)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)的進(jìn)步雖然推進(jìn)了電影產(chǎn)業(yè)的影響力和傳播力,卻也造成網(wǎng)絡(luò)盜版現(xiàn)象的越發(fā)嚴(yán)重,因此可以說盜版、侵權(quán)泛濫是制約后電影產(chǎn)業(yè)進(jìn)一步發(fā)展的重要原因。鑒于此,本論文首先簡(jiǎn)要介紹了電影產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈,重點(diǎn)對(duì)后電影產(chǎn)業(yè)及其子概念電影后產(chǎn)品和電影衍生品進(jìn)行闡述,并對(duì)市場(chǎng)上紛繁復(fù)雜的電影后產(chǎn)品和電影衍生品具體開發(fā)形式進(jìn)行了類型化分析。其次,本論文概述了我國(guó)后電影產(chǎn)業(yè)《著作權(quán)法》保護(hù)及著作權(quán)人享有的基本權(quán)利,并分別對(duì)電影后產(chǎn)品和電影衍生品的侵權(quán)行為進(jìn)行分析,特別是重點(diǎn)分析了視頻網(wǎng)站侵權(quán)行為和抗辯事由。再次,通過對(duì)后電影產(chǎn)業(yè)侵權(quán)行為的分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)《著作權(quán)法》對(duì)后電影產(chǎn)業(yè)保護(hù)不足之處,并分別針對(duì)電影后產(chǎn)品和電影衍生品保護(hù)不足提出合理化建議,以期《著作權(quán)法》可以完整保護(hù)整個(gè)電影產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈,為我國(guó)電影產(chǎn)業(yè)健康發(fā)展保駕護(hù)航。
[Abstract]:Now, the film economy has developed into a very important economic and cultural industry, and gradually formed a film industry chain. In the whole big film industry chain, the film production, the movie release and the movie theater screening belong to the upstream of the film economic ecosystem. The commercial development and utilization of films from cinemas is the downstream of the film economic ecosystem, which is generally called "post-film industry" in China. The upstream and downstream of the film industry together form a large film industry chain. The downstream part of the industry, that is, the commercial exploitation and utilization of copyright protection in the post-film industry, can be divided into post-film products and film derivatives. Compared with the developed countries, the development of China's post-film industry is relatively weak, and the market potential needs to be further developed. Among them, the vast majority of consumers lack a sense of copyright protection, and most film and television companies only attach importance to the box office. The lack of commercial use of the film is an important reason for the backward of the film industry in China. Throughout the whole post-industry market of our country, piracy infringement is ubiquitous. Meanwhile, although the progress of Internet technology has promoted the influence and dissemination of the film industry, it has also resulted in an increasingly serious phenomenon of network piracy. Therefore, piracy can be said to be more serious. The flooding of tort is an important reason to restrict the further development of film industry. In view of this, this paper first briefly introduces the film industry chain, focusing on the post-film industry and its sub-concept of post-film products and film derivatives. And the market complex after-film product and film derivatives specific development form of the type analysis. Secondly, this paper summarizes the protection of the copyright law and the basic rights enjoyed by copyright owners in the post-film industry of China, and analyzes the infringement of post-film products and film derivatives respectively. In particular, the focus of the analysis of the video site infringement and defenses. Thirdly, through the analysis of the tort behavior of the post-movie industry, we find that the copyright Law of our country is insufficient in the protection of the post-film industry, and put forward some reasonable suggestions for the inadequate protection of post-film products and film derivatives, respectively. It is hoped that the copyright Law can protect the whole film industry chain and protect the healthy development of China's film industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱商業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 蔣利瑋;;論商品化權(quán)的非正當(dāng)性[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2017年03期

2 徐聰穎;;我國(guó)著作權(quán)法引入懲罰性賠償制度研究[J];科技與法律;2015年03期

3 何煉紅;鄧文武;;商品化權(quán)之反思與重解[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年08期

4 張常珊;;關(guān)于國(guó)外電視節(jié)目模式版權(quán)引進(jìn)的觀察與思考[J];中國(guó)廣播電視學(xué)刊;2013年06期

5 任晟姝;;中國(guó)電影版權(quán)保護(hù)機(jī)制研究[J];電影藝術(shù);2010年06期

6 張丹丹;;著作權(quán)法在保護(hù)虛構(gòu)角色形象方面的局限及對(duì)策[J];法學(xué);2010年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2057259