本文選題：報批義務(wù) + 獨立生效��； 參考：《蘇州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：在合同有效成立后,國家干預(yù)合同效力及當(dāng)事人責(zé)任分配的唯一正當(dāng)理由是社會公共利益(或第三人利益),在合同約定未觸及公共利益(或第三人利益)時,應(yīng)當(dāng)貫徹當(dāng)事人意思自治原則。批準(zhǔn)生效合同在批準(zhǔn)之前,報請批準(zhǔn)條款已基于當(dāng)事人意思而獨立生效,對于違反報批義務(wù)的行為承擔(dān)的是違約責(zé)任,而非締約過失責(zé)任,但該違約責(zé)任的損害賠償額應(yīng)當(dāng)與批準(zhǔn)可能性相當(dāng)。原告訴請繼續(xù)履行時,以“效率”為目標(biāo)、以損害賠償替代繼續(xù)履行的效率違約理論并不可取,批準(zhǔn)可能性應(yīng)當(dāng)成為決定原告勝訴與否的根本因素。應(yīng)將審批機關(guān)作為“專家證人”的制度正式引入庭審,賦予審批機關(guān)在庭審中判斷批準(zhǔn)可能性大小的資格,以達(dá)到在司法權(quán)與行政權(quán)互不侵犯彼此領(lǐng)域的前提下,既實現(xiàn)行政審批的管控目標(biāo)又顧及當(dāng)事人間意思自治的狀態(tài),最終公平合理地解決雙方爭議。
[Abstract]:After the effective establishment of the contract, the only legitimate reason for the state to interfere with the validity of the contract and the distribution of the responsibilities of the parties is the public interest of the society (or the interests of the third party), and when the contract agreement does not touch the public interest (or the interests of the third party), The principle of party autonomy shall be implemented. Prior to the approval of the effective contract, the terms of application for approval have already taken effect independently on the basis of the intention of the parties, and the liability for breach of the obligation to submit approval is liability for breach of contract, rather than liability for fault in concluding the treaty, However, the damages for the liability for breach of contract shall be equivalent to the possibility of approval. When the plaintiff claims to continue to perform, the theory of "efficiency" as the target, and the theory of efficiency breach of contract replaced by compensation for damages is not desirable, and the possibility of approval should be the fundamental factor to decide the plaintiff's success or not. The system of examining and approving authorities as "expert witnesses" should be formally introduced into the trial, and the examination and approval authorities should be given the qualification to judge the possibility of approval in the trial, so as to achieve the premise that judicial power and administrative power do not infringe on each other's fields. It not only realizes the control goal of administrative examination and approval, but also takes into account the state of autonomy between the parties, and finally resolves the dispute fairly and reasonably.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 霍政欣;;效率違約的比較法研究[J];比較法研究;2011年01期

2 孫良國;單平基;;效率違約理論批判[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2010年06期

3 江偉,謝文哲;專家證人若干問題的探討(下)——以我國證據(jù)立法為背景[J];河南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2005年02期

4 李祖軍;呂輝;;鑒定人出庭作證制度立法解讀與完善進(jìn)路——以2012年民事訴訟法為背景[J];河北法學(xué);2014年01期

5 朱虎;;土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)中的發(fā)包方同意——一種治理的視角[J];中國法學(xué);2010年02期

6 劉貴祥;;論行政審批與合同效力——以外商投資企業(yè)股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓為線索[J];中國法學(xué);2011年02期

，

本文編號：2055743