本文選題：著作權(quán)保護(hù) + 行政不法��； 參考：《科技與出版》2017年06期

【摘要】：行政處罰與刑事處罰是著作權(quán)保護(hù)中的公法保障體系,但二者在調(diào)整范圍上存在著交叉和重疊,為了保證二者的準(zhǔn)確適用,有必要清晰界分行政不法與刑事不法的性質(zhì)與基本領(lǐng)域。文章提出了著作權(quán)人主體不明確,不法行為界定模糊的問題,同時(shí)描繪了通過移動(dòng)客戶端實(shí)施的不法行為新形式,并認(rèn)為不法行為在理論上定性難、立法體例分散,以及二者在構(gòu)成要件上的復(fù)雜關(guān)系是界定難的主要原因,最后提出了不法行為界定難的解決路徑。
[Abstract]:Administrative punishment and criminal punishment are the public law guarantee system in copyright protection, but there is overlap and overlap in the adjustment scope between them, in order to ensure their accurate application. It is necessary to clearly distinguish the nature and the basic field of administrative and criminal malfeasance. This paper puts forward the problem that the subject of copyright owner is not clear and the definition of illegal act is vague. At the same time, the author describes the new form of illegal act by mobile client, and thinks that it is difficult to define the illegal act in theory, and the legislative style is scattered. The main reason of the difficulty is the complicated relationship between the two elements. Finally, the solution to the difficulty of defining the illegal act is put forward.
【作者單位】： 中國政法大學(xué)"2011"司法文明協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心;
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41;D924.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 黃川;;簡論不法行為是侵權(quán)責(zé)任的構(gòu)成要件[J];研究生法學(xué);1995年02期

2 吳學(xué)安;;法律為打假撐腰[J];中國經(jīng)濟(jì)快訊;2001年28期

3 明新;湖南采取打擊假冒專利新措施[J];發(fā)明與革新;1995年03期

4 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：2055258