本文選題：診療規(guī)范 + 過錯推定　； 參考：《中國衛(wèi)生事業(yè)管理》2017年08期

【摘要】：當前對于"診療規(guī)范"的理解存在不夠全面和不符合醫(yī)學實踐等問題。診療規(guī)范的范圍應(yīng)當包括醫(yī)學教科書、醫(yī)藥學專著、專業(yè)期刊雜志,甚至外國或者國際組織制定的技術(shù)規(guī)范。在適用《侵權(quán)責任法》第58條的過錯推定時,應(yīng)當首先區(qū)分強制性與非強制性診療規(guī)范,然后進一步區(qū)分應(yīng)當遵守的和可以參考的診療規(guī)范。違反強制性診療規(guī)范的法律后果是不可反證的過錯推定,違反應(yīng)當遵守的診療規(guī)范的后果是可以反證的過錯推定,違反可以參考的診療規(guī)范不適用過錯推定。
[Abstract]:The current understanding of "diagnostic and treatment norms" is not comprehensive enough and does not conform to medical practice and so on. The scope of diagnostic and treatment norms should include medical textbooks, medical monographs, specialized journals, and even technical specifications developed by foreign or international organizations. In applying the presumption of fault in Article 58 of the Tort liability Law, we should first distinguish between compulsory and non-compulsory diagnostic and treatment norms, and then further distinguish between those that should be observed and those that can be referred to. The legal consequence of violating the compulsory diagnosis and treatment norm is the presumption of fault which cannot be proved, the consequence of the violation of the standard of diagnosis and treatment that should be observed is the presumption of fault that can be proved, and the presumption of fault is not applicable to the violation of the norm of diagnosis and treatment which can be referred to.
【作者單位】： 江蘇大學法學院;
【基金】：江蘇省教育廳高校哲學社會科學研究基金“醫(yī)務(wù)人員的告知義務(wù)及其責任研究”(編號:2014SJB812)
【分類號】：D923

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 毛艷霞;診療規(guī)范在醫(yī)療損害責任糾紛中的應(yīng)用[D];西南政法大學;2014年

，

本文編號：2054627