本文選題：“蹭網(wǎng)”行為 + 無線數(shù)據(jù)網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播資源��； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：伴隨互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)發(fā)展的日趨成熟，加之智能設(shè)備普遍的市場(chǎng)投入，無線網(wǎng)絡(luò)已經(jīng)成為我們?nèi)粘Ｉ钪胁豢苫蛉钡囊徊糠�，如今走進(jìn)城市的大街小巷，在餐廳、商場(chǎng)這些休閑的公共場(chǎng)所到處可見WIFI的標(biāo)志。但是當(dāng)我們?cè)谙硎苓@種高速便利的同時(shí)，一些不法分子也正在利用無線網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)手段侵犯他人的合法權(quán)益，這種未經(jīng)他人許可，沒有支付合理對(duì)價(jià)而使用他人合法無線網(wǎng)絡(luò)信號(hào)的行為被我們稱為“蹭網(wǎng)”。在世界上，針對(duì)“蹭網(wǎng)”而引起的違法犯罪行為，一些無線網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)發(fā)展比較超前的國(guó)家已經(jīng)出臺(tái)了或懲罰行為人或救濟(jì)受害人權(quán)益的相關(guān)法律規(guī)范。那么，對(duì)于近十年無線網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)超速發(fā)展的中國(guó)，“蹭網(wǎng)”這種行為會(huì)給我們的生活帶來何種影響，在中國(guó)建設(shè)法治社會(huì)的道路上會(huì)面對(duì)哪些考驗(yàn)，都是我們必然會(huì)遇到的問題，而保障一個(gè)健全的法治環(huán)境，充分保護(hù)人們的合法利益，是我們邁向法治社會(huì)新時(shí)期新發(fā)展的前提。 本文對(duì)“蹭網(wǎng)”行為日益加劇這一情況進(jìn)行了深入分析，，運(yùn)用法理學(xué)原理與民法理論相結(jié)合的分析方法，以“蹭網(wǎng)”行為的法律本質(zhì)作為切入點(diǎn)全面剖析“蹭網(wǎng)”行為，通過界定該行為的性質(zhì)以及歸納該行為的類型，力求更加準(zhǔn)確地制定“蹭網(wǎng)”行為的規(guī)則，明確責(zé)任的承擔(dān)。“蹭網(wǎng)”行為是一種行為人主觀惡意的綜合性侵權(quán)行為，本文以行為人是否破解WIFI密碼為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，將“蹭網(wǎng)”行為分為無破解WIFI密碼和破解WIFI密碼兩種�！安渚W(wǎng)”行為之所以需要適用懲罰性賠償責(zé)任，是因?yàn)樵撔袨樵斐傻膿p害已經(jīng)不是表面可見的侵犯受害人無線網(wǎng)絡(luò)信號(hào)使用權(quán)而導(dǎo)致的金錢損害，更多的是無法用金錢衡量的無形利益，這種權(quán)益的保護(hù)和救濟(jì)是一般侵權(quán)損害賠償制度不能涉及的。所以對(duì)于造成這種遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)超過實(shí)際可見損害的惡意侵權(quán)行為，唯有懲罰性賠償責(zé)任方可救濟(jì)。本文首先把懲罰性賠償責(zé)任與一般損害賠償責(zé)任和刑事責(zé)任相對(duì)比，論證“蹭網(wǎng)”行為適用懲罰性賠償制度的優(yōu)勢(shì)所在。其次借鑒外國(guó)法中對(duì)“蹭網(wǎng)”行為侵權(quán)責(zé)任的法律適用，總結(jié)利弊并結(jié)合侵權(quán)法的原理，解決“蹭網(wǎng)”行為懲罰性賠償?shù)呢?zé)任認(rèn)定問題。最后說明針對(duì)“蹭網(wǎng)”行為懲罰性賠償額計(jì)算的問題，我們應(yīng)該采用設(shè)定賠償金最低限額的限制法官自由權(quán)的計(jì)算方法，對(duì)受害人損失賠償額具體計(jì)算方式進(jìn)行完善，最終構(gòu)建“蹭網(wǎng)”行為的懲罰性賠償制度。這樣我們能夠從源頭上解決“蹭網(wǎng)”這一現(xiàn)象的發(fā)生，可以消除網(wǎng)絡(luò)的安全隱患，通過社會(huì)各方的相互配合，已達(dá)到保護(hù)受害者的合法利益，維護(hù)我國(guó)電信網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境秩序良好發(fā)展的目的。
[Abstract]:With the growing maturity of Internet technology and the widespread investment in the market for smart devices, wireless networks have become an indispensable part of our daily lives, and now we are walking into the streets of cities, in restaurants, Weii signs can be seen everywhere in casual public places like shopping malls. But while we are enjoying this high speed and convenience, some lawbreakers are also using wireless network technology to violate the legitimate rights and interests of others without the permission of others. The use of other people's legitimate wireless network signals without paying reasonable consideration is referred to as "netting." In the world, some countries that have advanced the development of wireless network technology have issued or punished the relevant legal norms for the rights and interests of the victims. Well, for China, with the rapid development of wireless network technology in the past decade, what kind of impact this behavior will bring to our lives and what kind of tests will we face on the road of building a society ruled by law in China? It is inevitable for us to meet the problems, and to protect a sound legal environment and fully protect the legitimate interests of people is the premise of our new development towards the new era of the society ruled by law. This article has carried on the thorough analysis to the situation which the "scrape net" behavior intensifies day by day, uses the law theory principle and the civil law theory to combine the analysis method, taking the law essence of the "scrape net" behavior as the breakthrough point, comprehensively analyzes the "scrape net" behavior. By defining the nature of the act and summing up the type of the act, the author tries to make the rules of "netting" behavior more accurate and make clear the responsibility. The behavior of "scrubbing net" is a kind of subjective and malicious comprehensive tort. This paper divides the behavior of "scrubbing net" into two kinds: no cracking WiFi password and breaking WiFi password according to whether the perpetrator breaks WiFi password or not. The reason why the "netting" action requires punitive liability is that the damage caused by the act is no longer the apparent pecuniary damage caused by the violation of the right to use the wireless network of the victim. What is more, the intangible benefits which cannot be measured by money, the protection and relief of this kind of rights and interests can not be involved in the general tort damage compensation system. Therefore, punitive liability is the only remedy for malicious tort that causes far more damage than actual visible damage. In this paper, the author compares the punitive damages liability with the general damages liability and criminal liability, and demonstrates the advantages of the "netting" behavior in applying the punitive damages system. Secondly, using the foreign law for reference, the author summarizes the advantages and disadvantages and combines the principles of tort law to solve the problem of liability identification of punitive damages. Finally, in view of the problem of calculating punitive damages for "scouring net" acts, we should adopt the calculation method of limiting the right to freedom of judges by setting the minimum amount of compensation, and perfect the concrete calculation method of the compensation for the victims' losses. Finally, the system of punitive damages should be constructed. In this way, we can solve the problem of "scouring the net" from the source, eliminate the hidden dangers of network security, and through the mutual cooperation of all parties in society, we have achieved the protection of the legitimate interests of the victims. The purpose of maintaining the order of telecom network environment in our country is to develop well.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王利明;美國(guó)懲罰性賠償制度研究[J];比較法研究;2003年05期

2 王軍;王軒;;英國(guó)法上的名譽(yù)權(quán)保護(hù)——以誹謗之訴為考察對(duì)象[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年02期

3 林旭霞;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)運(yùn)營(yíng)商與用戶之間協(xié)議的法律規(guī)制[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2012年05期

4 馬新彥;黃立嶸;;電信網(wǎng)絡(luò)運(yùn)營(yíng)商強(qiáng)制消費(fèi)懲罰性賠償責(zé)任的立法論證[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2014年03期

5 蒙曉陽;;論無線網(wǎng)絡(luò)數(shù)據(jù)傳輸資源的法律性質(zhì)[J];河北法學(xué);2011年01期

6 馬新彥;鄧冰寧;;論懲罰性賠償?shù)膿p害填補(bǔ)功能——以美國(guó)侵權(quán)法懲罰性賠償制度為啟示的研究[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

7 齊曉琨;;德國(guó)民法中的一般人格權(quán)[J];吉林省教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年10期

8

本文編號(hào)：2052401