本文選題：《民法總則》 + 人格權(quán)��； 參考：《東方法學(xué)》2017年06期

【摘要】：對人格權(quán)法是否獨立成編的學(xué)術(shù)爭論應(yīng)該遵循《民法總則》采用德國潘德克吞體系這一立法技術(shù)選擇所形成的基本共識�！睹穹ǹ倓t》第五章在"民事權(quán)利"一章中規(guī)定人格權(quán)內(nèi)容并明確了人格權(quán)與主體制度分離的立法模式,為人格權(quán)法獨立成編確立了體系性和類型化的基礎(chǔ)。獨立成編的侵權(quán)責(zé)任法以權(quán)利救濟法的行為規(guī)范與裁判法規(guī)范的立法定位,無法涵蓋人格權(quán)法規(guī)范的行為規(guī)范、裁判規(guī)范與賦權(quán)規(guī)范的內(nèi)容,由此確定了人格權(quán)法獨立成編的必然性�！睹穹ǹ倓t》有效實現(xiàn)人格權(quán)的憲法性權(quán)利的民法化、采用民商合一的立法體例對自然人與法人人格權(quán)予以分別規(guī)定,確定了人格權(quán)法獨立成編的應(yīng)然性�；谌烁駲�(quán)權(quán)利行使與權(quán)利保護的立法邏輯,人格權(quán)法編的設(shè)計,是我國在繼承德國潘德克吞體系下民法典總則所作出的必然選擇,也是《民法總則》發(fā)展德國潘德克吞體系所作出的必然選擇。
[Abstract]:The academic debate on whether the personality right law is independent should follow the basic consensus formed by the adoption of the German Pandecton system as a legislative and technical choice. Chapter 5 of the General principles of the Civil Law is in the chapter of "Civil Rights". It defines the content of personality right and clarifies the legislative model of separating personality right from subject system. It establishes the foundation of systematization and typology for the independent compilation of personality right law. The independent tort liability law, which is based on the legislative orientation of the legal norms of the right to remedy and the norms of the adjudication law, cannot cover the content of the norms of conduct of the personality law, the norms of the adjudication and the norms of the empowerment. Therefore, the necessity of the independence of personality right law is determined. The Civil Law General principles effectively realizes the civil law of the constitutional right of personality right, and respectively prescribes the personality right of natural person and legal person by adopting the legislative method of integrating civil and commercial affairs. The character of personality right law is determined. Based on the legislative logic of the exercise and protection of the right of personality, the design of the law of personality right is the inevitable choice made by our country in inheriting the general principles of the civil code under the system of Pandekton, Germany. It is also the inevitable choice of the development of German Pandecton system.
【作者單位】： 江西理工大學(xué)文法學(xué)院;中南大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家法治與法學(xué)理論研究項目課題“商法規(guī)范的獨特性與我國民法典編纂”(項目批準(zhǔn)號:16SFB1006) “法治湖南2011協(xié)同中心”的階段性研究成果
【分類號】：D923.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 魏曉陽;標(biāo)表型人格權(quán)的法律保護研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué);2017年

2 陳如炮;大數(shù)據(jù)時代個人信息之私權(quán)保護路徑研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2016年

，

本文編號：2037231