本文選題：善意取得 + 重大過(guò)失�。� 參考：《江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：最高人民法院正式公布《關(guān)于適用中華人民共和國(guó)物權(quán)法若干問(wèn)題的解釋(一)》,對(duì)善意取得制度進(jìn)行了細(xì)化、具體化,對(duì)今后法院正確適用善意取得制度,維護(hù)交易安全具有重要的意義。但無(wú)論是原來(lái)的法律還是新的解釋都未對(duì)善意取得制度中的“善意”作出詳細(xì)的定義�！吧埔狻痹谒痉▽�(shí)務(wù)中常常因其難以界定而引發(fā)爭(zhēng)議,“善意”判斷的模糊性容易導(dǎo)致司法實(shí)踐中法律適用的不一致。通過(guò)對(duì)實(shí)例的考察發(fā)現(xiàn),該司法解釋的規(guī)定仍存在著缺陷,值得進(jìn)一步的研究。文章旨在通過(guò)對(duì)我國(guó)的善意取得制度進(jìn)行實(shí)例研究,并結(jié)合理論與其他國(guó)家的立法,探尋一個(gè)更加符合善意取得制度立法精神、可供衡量的客觀標(biāo)準(zhǔn),以減輕司法的負(fù)擔(dān),維護(hù)交易安全和經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序。從司法實(shí)踐上來(lái)看,善意取得案例雖不多,但在合同以及相關(guān)的侵權(quán)案件中,都會(huì)與善意取得具有一定的關(guān)聯(lián)。善意認(rèn)定是否成立,會(huì)影響案件的最終的判決結(jié)果。本文通過(guò)對(duì)我國(guó)的司法案例進(jìn)行研究,考證我國(guó)實(shí)務(wù)上關(guān)于善意取得的案件中關(guān)于認(rèn)定買受人善意與否的依據(jù),并從我國(guó)對(duì)于善意取得制度中的“善意”進(jìn)行立法以及實(shí)例研究。本文將從以下四部分探究這一制度的善意認(rèn)定:第一部分是根據(jù)理論以及司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)善意取得制度中的“善意”進(jìn)行界定與分析,探討“善意”的法理基礎(chǔ)與價(jià)值體現(xiàn),并從“主觀善意”和“客觀善意”兩個(gè)方面探究我國(guó)法律框架下的善意認(rèn)定的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是否明晰和易于適用。第二部分是結(jié)合新的物權(quán)法解釋對(duì)善意取得司法實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的三個(gè)“善意”主要認(rèn)定要件(重大過(guò)失、合理價(jià)格和舉證責(zé)任分配)進(jìn)行實(shí)例考察,找出一些存在司法實(shí)踐中存在的問(wèn)題。第三部分是對(duì)善意認(rèn)定進(jìn)行立法例比較,從外國(guó)的優(yōu)秀法律理論中得到啟示。文章的最后一部分根據(jù)善意認(rèn)定要件在司法實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題,結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)外的立法以及理論,給出我國(guó)善意取得制度善意認(rèn)定的一些完善建議。
[Abstract]:The Supreme people's Court officially promulgated the interpretation of several issues concerning the application of the property Law of the people's Republic of China (1), which refined and concretized the system of bona fide acquisition, and correctly applied the system of bona fide acquisition to the future courts. It is of great significance to maintain the security of transactions. However, neither the original law nor the new interpretation provides a detailed definition of bona fide in bona fide acquisition. In judicial practice, "good faith" often leads to controversy because of its difficulty in defining it. The ambiguity of "good faith" judgment can easily lead to the inconsistency of the application of law in judicial practice. Through the investigation of examples, it is found that the provisions of the judicial interpretation still have defects, which is worthy of further study. The purpose of this paper is to study the system of bona fide acquisition in China, and combine the theory with the legislation of other countries to find out an objective standard which can be measured in order to lighten the burden of the administration of justice, which is more in line with the spirit of legislation of the system of acquisition in good faith. Maintain transaction security and economic order. In judicial practice, there are few cases of bona fide acquisition, but in the contract and related tort cases, there is a certain relationship between bona fide acquisition. Whether or not the bona fide determination is established will affect the final judgment result of the case. Through the study of judicial cases in our country, this paper studies the basis of determining whether the buyer is bona fide or not in the case of bona fide acquisition in practice in our country. And from our country to the bona fide acquisition system in the "good faith" legislation and an example study. This article will explore this system from the following four parts: the first part is based on the theory and judicial practice of bona fide acquisition system in the definition and analysis, to explore the "bona fide" legal basis and value embodiment. From the two aspects of "subjective goodwill" and "objective goodwill", this paper probes into whether the standards of goodwill determination under the legal framework of our country are clear and easy to apply. The second part is a case study of three main elements of "good faith" (gross negligence, reasonable price and distribution of burden of proof) which appear in the judicial practice of bona fide acquisition in combination with the new interpretation of property law. Find out some problems existing in judicial practice. The third part compares the legislation cases of bona fide cognizance and draws inspiration from foreign excellent legal theory. In the last part of the article, according to the problems in judicial practice, combined with the domestic and foreign legislation and theory, the author gives some perfect suggestions on the bona fide recognition of bona fide acquisition system in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 梁慧星;;《物權(quán)法司法解釋(一)》解讀[J];法治研究;2017年01期

2 劉大芬;;物權(quán)法中善意取得相關(guān)概念的辨析——結(jié)合《物權(quán)法》司法解釋(一)探討[J];法制與社會(huì);2016年18期

3 安仲偉;;善意取得在司法實(shí)踐中如何正確把握[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2015年22期

4 林凌;;論善意取得制度中的“合理價(jià)格”條款——以《物權(quán)法》106條為對(duì)象[J];山東工商學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年02期

5 紀(jì)海龍;;解構(gòu)動(dòng)產(chǎn)公示、公信原則[J];中外法學(xué);2014年03期

6 吳澤勇;;論善意取得制度中善意要件的證明[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2012年04期

7 程嘯;;論不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記簿公信力與動(dòng)產(chǎn)善意取得的區(qū)分[J];中外法學(xué);2010年04期

8 韓赤風(fēng);;善意取得中外比較研究[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年04期

9 葉金強(qiáng);論善意取得構(gòu)成中的善意且無(wú)重大過(guò)失要件[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

10 董學(xué)立;論物權(quán)變動(dòng)中的善意、惡意[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2004年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 桑成露;論善意取得制度中的“善意”[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

2 遲海寧;論善意取得制度的善意[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2004232