本文選題：私人復(fù)制 + 法定許可��； 參考：《暨南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：著作權(quán)法自誕生之日起就肩負(fù)著保護(hù)著作權(quán)人利益和保障公共利益的雙重使命,通過維護(hù)著作權(quán)人的利益以鼓勵作者進(jìn)行作品創(chuàng)作和傳播,最終促進(jìn)人類科學(xué)文化事業(yè)的發(fā)展。傳統(tǒng)條件下的私人復(fù)制對于平衡著作權(quán)人利益和公共利益起到了重要作用,是著作權(quán)法的基本內(nèi)容。但是隨著科學(xué)技術(shù)的快速發(fā)展,私人復(fù)制的合理性問題遭到了質(zhì)疑,如何重新定位私人復(fù)制的性質(zhì),如何平衡著作權(quán)人和使用者的利益,是當(dāng)前著作權(quán)法亟待解決的問題。本文的第一部分概述了私人復(fù)制問題,首先介紹了私人復(fù)制從印刷術(shù)時代至數(shù)字網(wǎng)絡(luò)時代的發(fā)展史,然后分析了私人復(fù)制的概念和特征,進(jìn)而討論了數(shù)字網(wǎng)絡(luò)時代下私人復(fù)制的新特征以及數(shù)字技術(shù)給私人復(fù)制帶來的沖擊,主要有復(fù)制主體的泛化導(dǎo)致著作權(quán)法調(diào)整的失衡及私人復(fù)制的合理使用屬性遭到質(zhì)疑,由此引出了本文的討論重點,即如何應(yīng)對數(shù)字技術(shù)給私人復(fù)制和著作權(quán)法帶來的危機。第二部分介紹了美國版權(quán)法史中的私人復(fù)制問題,通過透析美國版權(quán)史上有關(guān)私人復(fù)制的經(jīng)典案例如Sony案、Napster案及Grokster案等,探究如何在保護(hù)技術(shù)進(jìn)步前提下使私人復(fù)制使用者承擔(dān)其應(yīng)有的補償責(zé)任,以平衡著作權(quán)人、私人復(fù)制使用者和技術(shù)提供者的利益。第三部分分析了解決網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下私人復(fù)制應(yīng)以價值衡平原則為指導(dǎo),從“效率優(yōu)先,兼顧公平”、“合理考量秩序、公正和效益的關(guān)系”及“利益衡平與補償”等價值衡平總體要求出發(fā)論證了兼顧著作權(quán)人、使用者和技術(shù)提供者利益的重要性。探討了網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境背景下應(yīng)對私人復(fù)制利益平衡問題的“私人復(fù)制補償金制度”及“由合理使用向法定許可過渡”等新對策,從而為我國的借鑒做鋪墊。第四部分梳理了我國著作權(quán)法視野下的私人復(fù)制問題,提出我國私人復(fù)制規(guī)制的不足,結(jié)合前面四部分的內(nèi)容提出完善私人復(fù)制相關(guān)規(guī)定,改造合理使用制度。建設(shè)性的提出在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下把法定許可和補償金制度相結(jié)合,以更好的維護(hù)著作權(quán)人、私人復(fù)制使用者和技術(shù)提供者的利益。
[Abstract]:From the day of its birth, copyright Law shoulders the dual mission of protecting the interests of copyright owners and safeguarding the public interests. By safeguarding the interests of copyright owners, the authors are encouraged to create and disseminate their works, and finally to promote the development of human scientific and cultural undertakings. Private reproduction under traditional conditions plays an important role in balancing the interests of copyright owners and public interests and is the basic content of copyright law. However, with the rapid development of science and technology, the rationality of private reproduction has been questioned. How to reposition the nature of private reproduction and how to balance the interests of copyright owners and users is a problem to be solved urgently in copyright law. In the first part of this paper, the problem of private reproduction is summarized. Firstly, the history of private reproduction from the printing age to the digital network era is introduced, and then the concept and characteristics of private reproduction are analyzed. Then it discusses the new features of private reproduction and the impact of digital technology on private reproduction in the era of digital network. The main problems are the imbalance of copyright law adjustment and the reasonable use of private reproduction due to the generalization of replicators. This leads to the focus of this paper, that is, how to deal with the crisis brought by digital technology to private reproduction and copyright law. The second part introduces the problem of private reproduction in the history of American copyright law. By analyzing the classic cases of private reproduction in the history of American copyright, such as Sony case, Napster case and Grokster case, etc. In order to balance the interests of copyright owners, private copy users and technology providers, this paper explores how to make private copy users bear their due compensatory responsibilities under the premise of protecting technological progress. The third part analyzes how to solve the problem of private replication under the network environment, which should be guided by the principle of value balance, from "efficiency first, giving consideration to fairness" and "reasonable consideration of order". The relationship between justice and benefit "and the general requirement of" benefit balance and compensation "are discussed. The importance of taking into account the interests of copyright owner, user and technology provider is demonstrated. This paper probes into the new countermeasures, such as "private copy compensation system" and "transition from reasonable use to legal permission" in the context of network environment to balance the interests of private replication, thus paving the way for reference in our country. The fourth part combs the private copy problem under the view of our copyright law, puts forward the deficiency of the private copy regulation in our country, combines the contents of the previous four parts, puts forward the consummation of the private copy related regulation, reconstructs the reasonable use system. In order to better protect the interests of copyright owners, private copy users and technology providers, it is proposed to combine the legal license and compensation system in the network environment in order to better protect the interests of copyright owners, private copy users and technology providers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 張旭,孫海龍;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度中的利益平衡原則[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年04期

2 曹世華;;論數(shù)字時代的版權(quán)補償金制度及其導(dǎo)入[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年06期

3 梅臻;美國Napster案評析──兼論我國著作權(quán)法中的合理使用制度[J];法學(xué);2001年05期

4 黃春燕;楊明媚;;版權(quán)法中的私人復(fù)制:數(shù)字技術(shù)下的利益平衡[J];法制與社會;2009年05期

5 張凱;;論中國引進(jìn)版權(quán)補償金制度的必要性與可行性[J];法制與社會;2009年22期

6 彭學(xué)龍;;版權(quán)法的現(xiàn)實困境與未來展望[J];武漢理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2006年02期

7 馮曉青;胡夢云;;私人復(fù)制著作權(quán)問題的立法規(guī)制透視——兼論我國《著作權(quán)法》之完善[J];學(xué)海;2011年03期

8 張繼紅,周曉荷;私人復(fù)制:合理使用抑或侵權(quán)[J];鹽城工學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年04期

9 宋治禮;張偉君;;試論著作權(quán)法對私人復(fù)制行為的規(guī)制[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 吳偉光;數(shù)字技術(shù)環(huán)境下的版權(quán)法—危機與對策[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 馬志麗;私人復(fù)制補償金制度研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2008年

2 張尤賢;私人復(fù)制制度研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2010年

3 謝蓉;私人復(fù)制著作權(quán)問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2010年

4 王文浪;私人復(fù)制及其法律規(guī)制研究[D];揚州大學(xué);2012年

5 付雨;網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的私人復(fù)制問題研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號：1993648