本文選題：基因檢測(cè) + 商業(yè)化�。� 參考：《東南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：醫(yī)療機(jī)構(gòu)作為服務(wù)主體,運(yùn)用基因技術(shù)提供產(chǎn)前篩檢、新生兒篩檢、遺傳病檢驗(yàn)等項(xiàng)目已行之有年,相關(guān)法律救濟(jì)依我國(guó)現(xiàn)有的醫(yī)療法規(guī)及醫(yī)療管理制度足矣。然而,國(guó)內(nèi)外近年來(lái)興起非由醫(yī)療機(jī)構(gòu)服務(wù)、而是直接由基因檢測(cè)機(jī)構(gòu)向消費(fèi)者提供基因檢測(cè)服務(wù)的形式越來(lái)越多。目前,我國(guó)對(duì)此類商業(yè)化基因檢測(cè)服務(wù)沒(méi)有相應(yīng)的法律法規(guī)加以規(guī)制,此類基因檢測(cè)服務(wù)處于商業(yè)、醫(yī)療交叉的“灰色地帶”,工商部門(mén)和醫(yī)療衛(wèi)生執(zhí)法部門(mén)之間互相“踢皮球”,基因檢測(cè)服務(wù)消費(fèi)者的利益處于沒(méi)有明確的法律依據(jù)保護(hù)狀態(tài)。法學(xué)理論界對(duì)商業(yè)化基因檢測(cè)服務(wù)的研究甚少,僅有的幾篇多從法律倫理的角度討論基因隱私的保護(hù)問(wèn)題。本文從法律解釋的視角出發(fā),以基因檢測(cè)機(jī)構(gòu)與基因檢測(cè)服務(wù)消費(fèi)者間簽訂的服務(wù)合同為研究對(duì)象,對(duì)商業(yè)化基因檢測(cè)服務(wù)中產(chǎn)生的民事責(zé)任深入研究。全文分為三章：第一章對(duì)商業(yè)應(yīng)用下基因檢測(cè)民事責(zé)任的歸責(zé)必要性進(jìn)行分析。商業(yè)應(yīng)用下基因檢測(cè)服務(wù)因其檢測(cè)結(jié)果、方式、內(nèi)容特殊的客觀屬性區(qū)別于一般商業(yè)服務(wù)。當(dāng)下基因檢測(cè)服務(wù)市場(chǎng)中的主體多重、內(nèi)容多樣,卻少有市場(chǎng)監(jiān)督管理,使得明確基因檢測(cè)民事責(zé)任實(shí)有必要。第二章梳理商業(yè)應(yīng)用下基因檢測(cè)民事責(zé)任的可歸責(zé)理論基礎(chǔ)。商業(yè)應(yīng)用下基因檢測(cè)服務(wù)區(qū)別于醫(yī)療法律關(guān)系,適用承攬合同法律關(guān)系�；驒z測(cè)服務(wù)中以告知后同意原則和誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則為基本原則,在歸責(zé)原則方面亦有民事法律理論可循。第三章從檢測(cè)的不同主體形態(tài)和不同時(shí)期兩方面,討論基因檢測(cè)機(jī)構(gòu)的民事責(zé)任樣態(tài)�；驒z測(cè)機(jī)構(gòu)因參檢形式的不同,隨之獨(dú)立或連帶承擔(dān)責(zé)任�；跈z測(cè)前、中、后不同階段承擔(dān)相應(yīng)的民事責(zé)任,基因檢測(cè)機(jī)構(gòu)可能因違反服務(wù)合同中的主給付義務(wù)、從給付義務(wù)或附隨義務(wù)承擔(dān)違約責(zé)任,或因虛假?gòu)V告宣傳、侵犯受檢者隱私權(quán)等承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任。本文將基因檢測(cè)服務(wù)納入合同法律關(guān)系和侵權(quán)法律關(guān)系的調(diào)整范圍中,力圖尋求基因檢測(cè)服務(wù)的消費(fèi)者在現(xiàn)有民法規(guī)范體系下得以主張法律救濟(jì),期在民眾權(quán)益保護(hù)與商業(yè)創(chuàng)新發(fā)展間取得平衡機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:Medical institutions as the main service, using genetic technology to provide prenatal screening, neonatal screening, genetic disease testing and other items have been carried out for a long time, relevant legal relief in accordance with the existing medical regulations and medical management system is sufficient. However, in recent years, there are more and more forms of gene detection services provided to consumers by gene detection institutions rather than by medical institutions at home and abroad. At present, our country does not have the corresponding laws and regulations to regulate this kind of commercial gene testing service, and this kind of gene detection service is in the "grey area" of commercial and medical intersecting. Industrial and commercial departments and medical and health law enforcement departments "kick the ball" each other, the interests of gene testing service consumers in the absence of a clear legal basis to protect the state. There are few studies on commercial gene detection services in the field of legal theory, and only a few articles discuss the protection of gene privacy from the perspective of legal ethics. From the perspective of legal interpretation, this paper takes the service contract between gene testing institution and gene testing service consumer as the research object, and deeply studies the civil liability arising from the commercial gene testing service. The thesis is divided into three chapters: the first chapter analyzes the necessity of civil liability for gene testing in commercial applications. Gene detection services in commercial applications are different from general commercial services because of their unique objective attributes such as test results, methods and content. At present, there are many subjects in the market of gene testing services, but there are few market supervision and management, which makes it necessary to clarify the civil liability of gene testing. Chapter two combs the theoretical basis of civil liability for gene detection in commercial applications. Commercial application of genetic testing services is different from the medical legal relationship, applicable to contract legal relationship. In gene testing service, the principle of consent after informing and the principle of good faith are the basic principles, and there are civil legal theories to follow in the principle of imputation. The third chapter discusses the civil liability patterns of gene detection institutions from the two aspects of different subjects and different periods. Genetic testing institutions are independently or severally liable because of the different forms of reference. Based on the corresponding civil liability at different stages before, during and after testing, the genetic testing institution may be liable for breach of the principal payment obligation in the service contract, from the obligation of payment or collateral obligation, or for false advertising, Infringement of the right of privacy of the subject shall be liable for infringement. In this paper, genetic testing service is brought into the scope of adjustment of contract legal relationship and tort legal relationship, and the consumers who seek genetic testing service can claim legal remedy under the existing civil law norm system. In the period of protection of public rights and interests and commercial innovation and development to achieve a balance between the mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 呂斌;;周慧君:讓基因檢測(cè)服務(wù)走進(jìn)百姓家[J];華人時(shí)刊;2011年09期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 本報(bào)數(shù)據(jù)研究部 梁山;環(huán)保產(chǎn)業(yè)高峰論壇即將召開(kāi) 第三方檢測(cè)服務(wù)料全國(guó)推行[N];上海證券報(bào);2014年

2 通訊員 王彩琴 劉毅 特約記者 吳向泳;著力提高出生人口素質(zhì)[N];中國(guó)人口報(bào);2008年

3 陳懷瑾 丁一忠;無(wú)錫全力推進(jìn)檢驗(yàn)檢測(cè)服務(wù)外包產(chǎn)業(yè)跨越式發(fā)展[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2008年

4 趙新啟;遂平縣開(kāi)通計(jì)生服務(wù)“120”直通車[N];駐馬店日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

5 記者 巴家偉;八大舉措讓機(jī)動(dòng)車環(huán)檢更便捷[N];大連日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

6 本報(bào)記者 樊哲高;檢測(cè)服務(wù)：提高核心能力 支撐西部發(fā)展[N];中國(guó)電子報(bào);2012年

7 ;美國(guó)欲頒布進(jìn)口食品安全附加法規(guī)[N];中國(guó)國(guó)門(mén)時(shí)報(bào);2004年

8 趙延德 畢慧慧;提升檢測(cè)服務(wù)水平 做強(qiáng)公共服務(wù)平臺(tái)[N];中國(guó)質(zhì)量報(bào);2013年

9 本報(bào)記者 邵瀅;破解生命密碼 造福民眾健康[N];開(kāi)封日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

10 記者 張曉茹 林小春 劉石磊;2014，，哪些夢(mèng)想會(huì)照進(jìn)現(xiàn)實(shí)[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)參考報(bào);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 陳婷婷;商業(yè)應(yīng)用下基因檢測(cè)的民事責(zé)任[D];東南大學(xué);2015年

2 袁元;普蘭特檢測(cè)服務(wù)有限公司創(chuàng)業(yè)計(jì)劃書(shū)[D];電子科技大學(xué);2008年

3 張慰;開(kāi)放式電子文檔剽竊檢測(cè)服務(wù)構(gòu)建技術(shù)研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2008年

4 張偉友;SAES公司發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略的優(yōu)化措施研究[D];中南大學(xué);2013年

5 楊曉玲;傳感網(wǎng)支持下視頻變化檢測(cè)服務(wù)研究[D];上海大學(xué);2014年

6 王莉;F公司第三方商業(yè)檢測(cè)服務(wù)業(yè)務(wù)的營(yíng)銷策略研究[D];天津大學(xué);2014年

本文編號(hào)：1991159