本文選題：預期違約 + 不安抗辯權��； 參考：《東岳論叢》2017年10期

【摘要】：為了保護合同期待權,英美法系國家中建立了預期違約制度,而在大陸法系國家中則相應地實行了不安抗辯權制度。我國則借鑒和吸收了英美法系當中的預期違約制度,沿用了大陸法系當中的基本框架。我國法律規(guī)定對這兩種制度進行了相應的融合,確立了具有中國特色的預期違約制度。但是我國預期違約制度的規(guī)定還不夠成熟,法官有時會因為沒有相應的法律規(guī)定而采取故意推遲裁判的方式。針對我國立法中的不足,我們需要對預期違約制度進行進一步的探討與研究。
[Abstract]:In order to protect the right of expectation of contract, the system of anticipatory breach of contract has been established in common law countries, and the system of uneasiness right of defense has been implemented accordingly in countries of civil law system. Our country draws lessons from and absorbs the system of anticipatory breach of contract in Anglo-American law system, and follows the basic frame of civil law system. The law of our country combines the two systems and establishes the system of anticipatory breach of contract with Chinese characteristics. However, the system of anticipatory breach of contract in our country is not mature enough. Judges sometimes adopt the method of deliberately postponing the decision because there is no corresponding legal regulation. In view of the shortcomings of our legislation, we need to further explore and study the system of anticipatory breach of contract.
【作者單位】： 山東社會科學院《東岳論叢》編輯部;
【分類號】：D923.6
，

本文編號：1954910