發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-28 13:17

  本文選題：財(cái)產(chǎn)歸屬 + 組織性質(zhì)　； 參考：《遼寧大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：目前我國(guó)立法對(duì)寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)所有權(quán)歸屬的規(guī)定不明,理論觀點(diǎn)不統(tǒng)一,出現(xiàn)僧侶財(cái)產(chǎn)與寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)混同的情況。寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)主要來源于信眾的捐贈(zèng)、政府的補(bǔ)貼、寺廟活動(dòng)場(chǎng)所的自產(chǎn)收入、寺廟人員技能收入和法定孳息的取得。根據(jù)用途標(biāo)準(zhǔn)寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)應(yīng)歸屬于寺廟,利于財(cái)產(chǎn)的集中管理與使用,利于權(quán)益受損及責(zé)任承擔(dān)時(shí)主體的確認(rèn),符合宗教使用這一目的財(cái)產(chǎn)說的原則性要求,利于區(qū)分僧侶私人財(cái)產(chǎn)與寺廟集體財(cái)產(chǎn),杜絕不符合宗教性目的用途的財(cái)產(chǎn)濫用情形,可將公益慈善性事業(yè)的財(cái)產(chǎn)使用納入宗教目的外延范圍這六方面優(yōu)勢(shì)。寺廟組織性質(zhì)定位模糊以及寺廟被侵權(quán)時(shí)請(qǐng)求權(quán)主體混亂的局面,說明我國(guó)法律在該問題上的模糊態(tài)度和理論界對(duì)此問題未達(dá)成共識(shí)。寺廟組織與法人非民事個(gè)體目的的集合、有代表人代理進(jìn)行民事行為和財(cái)產(chǎn)獨(dú)立性三大特征相符,應(yīng)將寺廟組織定性為財(cái)團(tuán)法人,發(fā)揮權(quán)責(zé)主體明確和利于區(qū)分僧侶個(gè)人財(cái)產(chǎn)與寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)的優(yōu)勢(shì)。我國(guó)寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)的使用,存在以政令決定旅游模式獲取利益和干涉寺廟正常宗教事務(wù)的行政介入明顯的客觀事實(shí)。國(guó)外在寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)使用上主要有信托制、公司制兩種模式,在“政教分離”原則的要求下,應(yīng)采用公司制中成員制的模式,發(fā)揮能夠?yàn)楹侠硇缘纳虡I(yè)營(yíng)利行為作出較好解釋,實(shí)現(xiàn)財(cái)產(chǎn)宗教性目的的使用,達(dá)到“圣俗分離”原則對(duì)寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)使用的指引優(yōu)勢(shì)。
[Abstract]:At present, the regulations of ownership of temple property in our country are not clear, and the theory view is not unified, and the monastic property is mixed with temple property. The temple property mainly comes from the donation of the believers, the subsidy of the government, the self-production income of the temple activity place, the income of the temple staff's skill and the acquisition of the civil fruits. According to the standard of use, the temple property should belong to the temple, which is conducive to the centralized management and use of the property, to the confirmation of the subject when the rights and interests are damaged and the responsibility is assumed, and conforms to the principle requirements of the theory of religious use of the property for this purpose. It is advantageous to distinguish the private property of monks from the collective property of temples, to put an end to the abuse of property which does not conform to the purpose of religion, and to bring the use of property of public welfare and charity into the scope of extension of religious purpose. The vague orientation of the nature of temple organization and the confusion of the subject of claim when the temple is infringed indicates that the fuzzy attitude of the law on this issue and the consensus of the theorists on this issue have not been reached. The collection of the purpose of the temple organization and the non-civil individual purpose of the legal person, the representative person carrying out the civil act and the property independence accord with the three major characteristics, so the temple organization should be regarded as the financial group legal person. Give full play to the power and responsibility of the subject clear and conducive to distinguish between the monk's personal property and temple property advantage. In the use of temple property in our country, there is an obvious objective fact that the administrative intervention in the mode of tourism and interference in the normal religious affairs of temples is decided by government order. There are two modes in the use of temple property abroad: trust system and corporate system. Under the principle of "separation of state and religion", we should adopt the mode of member system in the corporate system to give a better explanation for the reasonable commercial profit behavior. To achieve the religious purpose of the use of property, to achieve the "separation of sacred customs" principle of the use of temple property guidance advantage.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 張建文;;漢傳佛教僧人的遺產(chǎn)繼承問題[J];佛教文化;2009年03期

2 王永會(huì);禪宗清規(guī)與中國(guó)佛教寺院僧團(tuán)管理制度[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年01期

3 梁迎修;;我國(guó)宗教財(cái)產(chǎn)法律保護(hù)芻議[J];中國(guó)宗教;2008年01期

4 岳臻;“宗教需求”與宗教存在[J];中央社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 田麗莉;論寺廟財(cái)產(chǎn)歸屬及其糾紛解決機(jī)制[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1946865