本文選題：安全保障義務(wù) + 侵權(quán)補(bǔ)充責(zé)任��； 參考：《延邊大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái),服務(wù)場(chǎng)所內(nèi)的第三入侵權(quán)事件頻繁發(fā)生,由于安全保障義務(wù)逐漸深入人心,經(jīng)營(yíng)者也牽涉其中。針對(duì)第三人侵權(quán)事件的媒體報(bào)道屢見不鮮,司法實(shí)踐中類似事件也數(shù)不勝數(shù)。但是,由于2009年頒布的《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》只是規(guī)定在第三人侵權(quán)事件中,有過錯(cuò)的經(jīng)營(yíng)者承擔(dān)相應(yīng)的侵權(quán)補(bǔ)充責(zé)任,卻沒有對(duì)補(bǔ)充責(zé)任構(gòu)成要件、相應(yīng)責(zé)任的確定、責(zé)任效力等做出明確的規(guī)定,導(dǎo)致在訴訟活動(dòng)中并沒有能遵循的統(tǒng)一的實(shí)體規(guī)則；而在司法實(shí)踐中,各地法院也是一邊摸索,一邊積累經(jīng)驗(yàn),并沒有全國(guó)性、統(tǒng)一的審判實(shí)施細(xì)則。因而,最終出現(xiàn)了不同地區(qū)、不同級(jí)別法院的審理判決的缺乏一致性、科學(xué)性與均衡性,有失法一直倡導(dǎo)的公平與正義,也同樣無(wú)法實(shí)現(xiàn)有法可依、執(zhí)法必嚴(yán)、違法必究。同時(shí),由于我國(guó)消費(fèi)者法律意識(shí)與維權(quán)意識(shí)薄弱,也在一定程度上助長(zhǎng)了服務(wù)場(chǎng)所經(jīng)營(yíng)者的僥幸心理,使其能夠“光明正大”的逃避侵權(quán)補(bǔ)充責(zé)任。本文從經(jīng)營(yíng)者的安全保障義務(wù)出發(fā),確定在第三方侵權(quán)事件中經(jīng)營(yíng)者補(bǔ)充責(zé)任的特征、定位及價(jià)值,同時(shí)結(jié)合我國(guó)具體的國(guó)情及法律法規(guī)現(xiàn)狀,在具體的案例中研究、探討侵權(quán)補(bǔ)充責(zé)任制度的現(xiàn)狀及問題,并提出相應(yīng)的對(duì)策與建議,完善我國(guó)經(jīng)營(yíng)者侵權(quán)補(bǔ)充責(zé)任的法律保障制度,給與侵權(quán)補(bǔ)充責(zé)任以法律支撐及訴訟保障,為經(jīng)營(yíng)者因安全保障義務(wù)而發(fā)生的侵權(quán)補(bǔ)充責(zé)任提供統(tǒng)一的制度保障與法律支撐。簡(jiǎn)言之,本文立足于安全保障義務(wù),從經(jīng)營(yíng)者的侵權(quán)補(bǔ)充責(zé)任出發(fā),從實(shí)體與程序的雙重角度,兼顧消費(fèi)者,擬建構(gòu)一套與侵權(quán)補(bǔ)充責(zé)任相適應(yīng)的法律保障制度,在保障侵權(quán)補(bǔ)充責(zé)任能夠在司法實(shí)踐中科學(xué)、合理、合法的實(shí)現(xiàn)與落實(shí)的同時(shí),將法律、道德與司法有效的統(tǒng)一起來(lái),妥善的協(xié)調(diào)第三人、經(jīng)營(yíng)者及受害人的權(quán)利義務(wù)關(guān)系,修復(fù)受損的社會(huì)關(guān)系,化解社會(huì)矛盾,消除社會(huì)的不良因素,保障社會(huì)穩(wěn)定、秩序與和諧。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the third entry tort happened frequently in the service place, and the operator was involved because the duty of safety and security gradually took root in the people's mind. Media reports on third-party infringement are common, and similar events are numerous in judicial practice. However, since the Tort liability Law promulgated in 2009 only stipulates that in the tort incident of the third party, the operator with fault bears the corresponding supplementary tort liability, it does not determine the constitutive elements of the supplementary liability and the corresponding liability. In judicial practice, the courts in various places are also groping and accumulating experience, and there is no national law, because of the clear provisions on the effectiveness of liability, which lead to the lack of uniform substantive rules that can be followed in litigation activities, and in judicial practice, the courts in various parts of the country are also groping and accumulating experience. Uniform rules for the execution of trials. As a result, there is a lack of consistency, scientificalness and balance in the trial decisions of different courts in different regions, the fairness and justice advocated by the law all the time, and the same inability to implement the law, enforce the law strictly, and prosecute the violations of the law. At the same time, because of the weak legal consciousness and rights protection consciousness of consumers in our country, it also contributes to the fluke psychology of service site operators to a certain extent, and enables them to evade the supplementary liability of infringement in a fair and impartial manner. Starting from the operator's duty of safety and security, this paper determines the characteristics, orientation and value of the operator's supplementary responsibility in the case of third party tort. At the same time, combined with the specific situation of our country and the current situation of laws and regulations, it is studied in the specific cases. This paper probes into the present situation and problems of the system of supplementary liability for tort, and puts forward corresponding countermeasures and suggestions to perfect the legal protection system of supplementary liability for infringement of operators in our country, and to provide legal support and procedural protection for supplementary liability of tort. To provide unified system and legal support for the additional liability of tort caused by the duty of safety guarantee. In short, based on the duty of safety and security, starting from the operator's supplementary liability of tort, from the perspective of entity and procedure, and taking into account consumers, this paper intends to construct a set of legal protection system suitable for the supplementary liability of tort. In order to ensure that the supplementary liability of tort can be scientifically, reasonably and legally realized and implemented in judicial practice, the law, morality and judicature can be effectively unified, and the rights and obligations of the third party, operator and victim can be properly coordinated. Repair damaged social relations, resolve social contradictions, eliminate social factors, ensure social stability, order and harmony.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 楊立新;論侵權(quán)責(zé)任的補(bǔ)充責(zé)任[J];法律適用;2003年06期

2 張新寶;;我國(guó)侵權(quán)責(zé)任法中的補(bǔ)充責(zé)任[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年06期

3 李中原;;論民法上的補(bǔ)充債務(wù)[J];法學(xué);2010年03期

4 劉士國(guó);安全關(guān)照義務(wù)論[J];法學(xué)研究;1999年05期

5 張新寶,唐青林;經(jīng)營(yíng)者對(duì)服務(wù)場(chǎng)所的安全保障義務(wù)[J];法學(xué)研究;2003年03期

6 李中原;;不真正連帶債務(wù)理論的反思與更新[J];法學(xué)研究;2011年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1946131