發(fā)布時間：2018-05-26 22:25

  本文選題：風(fēng)險社會 + 產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量�。� 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：面對現(xiàn)代社會種種風(fēng)險層出不窮的特性,德國社會學(xué)家烏爾里希·貝克創(chuàng)造性地提出了“風(fēng)險社會”理論,用來描述和解釋現(xiàn)代社會的“風(fēng)險特征”。同時,風(fēng)險社會理論在不斷地發(fā)展和演變過程中,也得到了越來越多學(xué)者的認(rèn)同和豐富。現(xiàn)在,風(fēng)險社會已經(jīng)成為了一個分析現(xiàn)代社會問題的重要工具,也為除社會學(xué)之外的其他學(xué)科,如經(jīng)濟學(xué)、法學(xué)、環(huán)境學(xué)等提供了不可多得的分析工具和解讀視角。本文也正是在梳理產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量領(lǐng)域大規(guī)模侵權(quán)問題研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上,借用風(fēng)險社會的分析工具,對產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量大規(guī)模侵權(quán)進行了重新解構(gòu),從而得出構(gòu)建產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量大規(guī)模侵權(quán)的新型救濟機制的結(jié)論。本文的核心視角,就是運用風(fēng)險社會的理念去解讀我國產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量的大規(guī)模侵權(quán)現(xiàn)象。筆者提出,風(fēng)險社會視角下的產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量大規(guī)模侵權(quán)的救濟,應(yīng)當(dāng)從風(fēng)險社會的風(fēng)險環(huán)境適應(yīng)理念、風(fēng)險制度理念以及風(fēng)險社會責(zé)任理念中汲取經(jīng)驗和借鑒。通過數(shù)據(jù)的搜集和整理,以及典型案例的引入與分析,回顧了近年來我國產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量領(lǐng)域大規(guī)模侵權(quán)的現(xiàn)狀和特征。然后,筆者分析了我國產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量領(lǐng)域?qū)Υ笠?guī)模侵權(quán)的救濟問題。最后,提出了完善我國產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量領(lǐng)域大規(guī)模侵權(quán)救濟的一系列措施。這一章所提出的“事前——事中——事后”相結(jié)合的救濟模式是全文的核心觀點所在。根據(jù)風(fēng)險社會理論,當(dāng)代社會的法律制度應(yīng)當(dāng)具有適應(yīng)性和預(yù)防性,也就是說,當(dāng)代法律制度應(yīng)當(dāng)將當(dāng)代社會風(fēng)險作為一個常態(tài)來對待,而現(xiàn)行法律救濟則應(yīng)當(dāng)是一個能夠適應(yīng)當(dāng)代社會風(fēng)險環(huán)境的長效機制。因此,筆者提出,在救濟機制上應(yīng)該采取“事前”“事中”“事后”的劃分方式:“事前”是防患于未然,是未雨綢繆;“事中”是全時監(jiān)控,及時發(fā)現(xiàn)和阻卻;“事后”則是全面救濟,妥善救濟。在這樣一個全方位的救濟機制之下,能夠更好地應(yīng)對產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量領(lǐng)域的大規(guī)模侵權(quán)問題,也能夠更好地救濟受害者的正當(dāng)權(quán)益。
[Abstract]:In the face of the endless emergence of various risks in modern society, German sociologist Ulrich Baker creatively put forward the theory of "risk society", which is used to describe and explain the "risk characteristics" of modern society. At the same time, the theory of risk society has been recognized and enriched by more and more scholars in the process of continuous development and evolution. Now, risk society has become an important tool to analyze the problems of modern society, and it also provides a rare analytical tool and perspective for other subjects other than sociology, such as economics, law, environmental science and so on. On the basis of combing the research results of large-scale tort in the field of product quality and using the analytical tools of risk society, this paper deconstructs the large-scale infringement of product quality. Thus, the conclusion of constructing a new relief mechanism for mass infringement of product quality is reached. The core angle of view of this paper is to use the concept of risk society to interpret the mass infringement of product quality in China. The author puts forward that the relief of large-scale infringement of product quality from the perspective of risk society should draw lessons from the concepts of risk environment adaptation risk system and risk social responsibility. Through the collection and collation of data and the introduction and analysis of typical cases, this paper reviews the current situation and characteristics of large-scale infringement in the field of product quality in China in recent years. Then, the author analyzes the relief of mass infringement in the field of product quality in China. Finally, the author puts forward a series of measures to improve the relief of mass infringement in the field of product quality. In this chapter, the core point of view lies in the combination of "beforehand-in-hindsight" relief mode. According to the theory of risk society, the legal system of contemporary society should be adaptive and preventive, that is to say, contemporary legal system should treat contemporary social risks as a normal state. The current legal remedy should be a long-term mechanism which can adapt to the contemporary social risk environment. Therefore, the author puts forward that in the relief mechanism, we should adopt the way of dividing "beforehand" matter "and" afterwards ":" beforehand "is to prevent trouble in advance, is to make good plan ahead of time," matter "is full-time monitoring, timely detection and hindrance; "afterwards" is a comprehensive relief, appropriate relief. Under such a comprehensive relief mechanism, it can better deal with the massive infringement problem in the field of product quality, and also can better relief the legitimate rights and interests of the victims.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 羅干;;政法機關(guān)在構(gòu)建和諧社會中擔(dān)負(fù)重大歷史使命和政治責(zé)任[J];求是;2007年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王立兵;大規(guī)模侵權(quán)的國家救濟責(zé)任機制研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 陸玉笛;大規(guī)模侵權(quán)損害救濟問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

2 郭瑋;大規(guī)模侵權(quán)的民事救濟研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2011年

3 孫紅飛;大規(guī)模侵權(quán)行為民事責(zé)任研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2011年

4 李娜;風(fēng)險社會背景下我國食品安全監(jiān)管體制問題與對策研究[D];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué);2011年

5 吳迪;大規(guī)模侵權(quán)損害賠償機制研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

6 許文艷;大規(guī)模侵權(quán)損害賠償基金制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

7 石煜;大規(guī)模產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量侵權(quán)行為的受害人救濟機制研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2010年

8 崔愛華;大規(guī)模侵權(quán)行為的立法及司法對策[D];蘇州大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1939175