本文選題：混合共同擔(dān)保 + 人的擔(dān)保　； 參考：《江漢論壇》2017年06期

【摘要】：盡管混合共同擔(dān)保的學(xué)術(shù)與實務(wù)爭鳴不斷,但卻未有通說形成。德國理論與實踐把混合共同擔(dān)保放在一個體系下思考,相關(guān)經(jīng)驗值得借鑒�；旌瞎餐瑩�(dān)保本質(zhì)上與共同保證并無差異,均應(yīng)以連帶債務(wù)構(gòu)建擔(dān)保人對債權(quán)人義務(wù)的基礎(chǔ)。在外部關(guān)系上,債權(quán)人有權(quán)選擇履行義務(wù)人,包括在債務(wù)人提供物的擔(dān)保的情形。在內(nèi)部關(guān)系上,擔(dān)保人之間有相互求償權(quán),并應(yīng)平均分擔(dān)義務(wù)。未來民法典物權(quán)編修訂應(yīng)建立法定債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)移規(guī)則;充分認(rèn)識擔(dān)保規(guī)則的任意性特征,在立法技術(shù)上統(tǒng)一處理當(dāng)事人變更約定的情形,并置于規(guī)則的最后。
[Abstract]:Although the academic and practical controversy of mixed co-guarantee is constant, it has not come into being. German theory and practice put the mixed co-guarantee in one system, and the relevant experience is worth learning. There is no difference between the mixed joint guarantee and the joint guarantee in essence, and the basis of the guarantor's obligation to the creditor should be constructed by the joint and several obligations. In external relations, the creditor has the right to choose the performance obligor, including in the case of security provided by the debtor. In the internal relations, the guarantors have the right to claim each other, and should share the obligations equally. In the future, the revision of civil code should establish the rule of transfer of legal creditor's rights, fully understand the arbitrariness characteristic of the guarantee rule, deal with the situation of changing the agreement of the parties in the legislative technique, and put it at the end of the rule.
【作者單位】： 清華大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D923.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張艷;焦陽;;保證與物的擔(dān)保并存的責(zé)任承擔(dān)[J];濱州學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年04期

2 劉保玉;論我國物的擔(dān)保制度的完善[J];法學(xué)評論;1995年06期

3 殷潔;保證與物的擔(dān)保并存適用之難點(diǎn)[J];江西財經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2001年02期

4 于宏偉,李靜;淺論保證與物的擔(dān)保并存時的責(zé)任承擔(dān)——對《擔(dān)保法》第28條及其解釋第38條的質(zhì)疑與完善[J];廣東經(jīng)濟(jì)管理學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年01期

5 李強(qiáng);;保證與物的擔(dān)保并存時法律適用之檢討[J];甘肅政法成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年01期

6 吳春林;;物的擔(dān)保與保證并存關(guān)系分析——兼評物權(quán)法草案第一百九十八條[J];湖北農(nóng)村金融研究;2006年08期

7 王莉媛;鐘紅梅;;保證和物的擔(dān)保并存時的責(zé)任分配——兼評《物權(quán)法》第176條[J];法制與社會;2011年16期

8 李哲;如何界定與物的擔(dān)保并存的保證責(zé)任[J];鄭州煤炭管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2000年04期

9 黃U，

本文編號：1935958