發(fā)布時間：2018-05-25 05:35

  本文選題：住宅類商品房 + 反悔權(quán)　； 參考：《天津師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：2013年修訂的《中華人民共和國消費者權(quán)益保護法》(以下簡稱《消法》),首次明確規(guī)定了消費者享有"反悔權(quán)"。它的確立對促進誠信經(jīng)營,規(guī)范交易秩序有著十分重要的意義。但《消法》將反悔權(quán)的適用范圍僅限定于很少商品的特殊銷售方式上。如此一來,反悔權(quán)適用的范圍就變得十分狹窄。住宅類商品房作為價值相對較大的消費品,在我國市場交易中的地位舉足輕重,卻沒有被納入"反悔權(quán)"的適用范圍。在我國,商品房領(lǐng)域能否推行"反悔權(quán)"制度,一直備受爭議。但以往學(xué)者的爭論只集中在"商品房領(lǐng)域是否適用反悔權(quán)"這個問題上,很少有人對商品房進行分類后再討論是否適用反悔權(quán)的問題。商品房可以根據(jù)使用目的的不同,分為兩類:一類是基于投資目的的經(jīng)營性商品房,另一類是住宅類商品房。本文研究的是住宅類商品房領(lǐng)域能否適用反悔權(quán)的問題。住宅類商品房涉及到婚姻、養(yǎng)老、戶籍、教育、醫(yī)療等關(guān)乎家庭生存發(fā)展的重大問題,是極其特殊又重要的領(lǐng)域,可以作為"特殊交易形態(tài)"的例外。本文認(rèn)同對后悔權(quán)的適用范圍進行限制,反對沒有限度地擴張反悔權(quán)的適用范圍,但是主張將住宅類商品房納入"反悔權(quán)"的適用范圍。本文共分為四個部分:第一部分從商品、消費者的法律特征等角度論證了住宅類商品房購買者屬于消費者。第二部分闡述了住宅類商品房領(lǐng)域引入反悔權(quán)的依據(jù)。從理論依據(jù)和現(xiàn)實依據(jù)兩個方面分析住宅類商品房領(lǐng)域引入反悔權(quán)的必要性。第三部分探討了在住宅類商品房領(lǐng)域推行反悔權(quán)可能會存在的諸多問題。比如立法上的障礙、反悔權(quán)適用的期限與方式問題、市場投機問題以及如何保障反悔權(quán)制度的實施問題。第四部分針對問題提出相關(guān)建議包括尋求立法上的突破;設(shè)定合理的反悔權(quán)期限與書面化行使方式;設(shè)置解約賠償以及制度實施的保障措施。
[Abstract]:The Consumer Rights and interests Protection Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "Consumer Law"), amended in 2013, explicitly stipulates that consumers enjoy the "right of estoppel" for the first time. Its establishment has very important meaning to promote the good faith management and standardize the order of transaction. However, the law limits the scope of application of estoppel to the special way of sale of few goods. In this way, the scope of application of the right to estoppel becomes very narrow. As a relatively large value of consumer goods, residential commercial housing plays an important role in market transactions in our country, but it is not included in the scope of application of "right of retrogression". In our country, whether or not the field of commercial housing can carry out the system of "reneging right" has been controversial all the time. However, in the past, the debate only focused on whether the right of retrogression should be applied in the field of commercial housing, and few people discussed whether the right of retrogression should be applied after the classification of commercial housing. Commercial housing can be divided into two categories according to the purpose of use: one is commercial housing based on investment purpose, the other is residential commercial housing. This paper studies whether the right of retrogression can be applied in the field of residential commercial housing. The residential commercial housing involves marriage, pension, household registration, education, medical treatment and other important issues related to the survival and development of the family, is an extremely special and important field, can be taken as the "special transaction form" exception. This paper agrees to limit the scope of application of the right of regret, opposes the unlimited expansion of the scope of application of the right of retrogression, but advocates that the commercial housing of housing should be brought into the scope of application of the right of retrogression. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part demonstrates that the buyers of residential housing belong to consumers from the point of view of commodity, consumers' legal characteristics and so on. The second part expounds the basis of introducing the right of retrogression in the field of residential commercial housing. This paper analyzes the necessity of introducing the right of retrogression in the field of commercial housing in terms of theoretical basis and practical basis. The third part discusses a lot of problems that may exist in the field of residential commercial housing. For example, the legislative obstacle, the time limit and the way of applying the right of estoppel, the problem of market speculation and how to guarantee the implementation of the system of the right of estoppel. The fourth part puts forward some suggestions to solve the problem, including seeking a breakthrough in legislation; setting up a reasonable time limit and written exercise of the right of estoppel; setting up the compensation for the termination of the contract and the safeguard measures for the implementation of the system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.8

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張靖;我國消費者保護中的冷卻期制度研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 沈列;消費者反悔權(quán)研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2015年

2 石穎;我國消費者反悔權(quán)制度的立法完善研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2015年

3 劉瑩;商品房消費者權(quán)益保護問題研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2014年

4 鄭文銀;商品房預(yù)購人知情權(quán)若干法律問題研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2009年

5 李靜;論商品房消費者權(quán)益的保護[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1932325