發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-23 08:18

  本文選題：建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán) + 成員權(quán)行使　； 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來,建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)中的管理性權(quán)利——成員權(quán)的重要性日益彰顯。事實(shí)上,我國《物權(quán)法》在成員權(quán)的性質(zhì)界定、權(quán)利行使及救濟(jì)等方面并未提供明確的指導(dǎo)。為了解決因法律缺位造成的種種不便,有效地保護(hù)業(yè)主利益,本文擬通過對(duì)國外(地區(qū))成員權(quán)制度進(jìn)行比較研究,對(duì)我國現(xiàn)行制度運(yùn)行中存在的問題進(jìn)行梳理,并為我國成員權(quán)制度的完善提供可行性建議。本文由以下五個(gè)章節(jié)組成:第一章是成員權(quán)的概念及性質(zhì)界定。在“三元論”的基礎(chǔ)上,“物法性說”和“人法性說”都難以包容成員權(quán)的性質(zhì),應(yīng)當(dāng)將成員權(quán)劃入社員權(quán)范疇,成員權(quán)是區(qū)別于傳統(tǒng)民事權(quán)利的獨(dú)立的新型民事權(quán)利。第二章是國外及我國臺(tái)灣地區(qū)成員權(quán)行使法律制度的比較法研究。西方各國的成員權(quán)行使制度無不受到“三權(quán)分立”理論的深刻影響,普遍建立的都是權(quán)力機(jī)關(guān)、執(zhí)行機(jī)關(guān)和監(jiān)督機(jī)關(guān)的三層模式。德國《住宅所有權(quán)法》將住宅所有權(quán)人作為一個(gè)獨(dú)立的管理機(jī)關(guān),法國對(duì)于管理機(jī)關(guān)的組成人員規(guī)定較為靈活多樣,以及各個(gè)國家對(duì)于監(jiān)督制度的圓滑設(shè)置等,都值得我國立法者在立法時(shí),選擇性地學(xué)習(xí)借鑒。第三章是我國建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)中成員權(quán)行使存在的問題。由于現(xiàn)行法律存在漏洞,導(dǎo)致了在實(shí)踐中成員權(quán)的行使都存在問題。第四章是成員權(quán)行使的理論分析。管理團(tuán)體是成員權(quán)的行使機(jī)構(gòu),當(dāng)前各國均趨向于承認(rèn)管理團(tuán)體具有法人資格,這便于管理團(tuán)體以自己的名義行使包括經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)、司法活動(dòng)在內(nèi)的管理職權(quán)。區(qū)分所有人在不違反強(qiáng)制性規(guī)定的前提下,可根據(jù)需要自行選擇管理方式,這也體現(xiàn)了業(yè)主自治精神。業(yè)主大會(huì)和業(yè)主委員會(huì)作為決策機(jī)構(gòu)和執(zhí)行機(jī)構(gòu),是維持成員權(quán)正常行使的重要保證。第五章是我國建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)之成員權(quán)行使制度的完善。針對(duì)成員權(quán)行使中出現(xiàn)的問題,出臺(tái)一部《建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)法》勢在必行,完善業(yè)主大會(huì)召開機(jī)制,明確業(yè)委會(huì)的法律地位,建立監(jiān)督機(jī)構(gòu),以真正維護(hù)業(yè)主權(quán)益。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the importance of management right-member right in building ownership is becoming more and more obvious. In fact, China's Real right Law does not provide clear guidance in defining the nature of membership rights, exercising rights and remedies. In order to solve the inconvenience caused by the absence of law and protect the interests of the owner effectively, this paper intends to make a comparative study of the foreign (regional) member right system, and to sort out the existing problems in the operation of the current system in our country. And provides the feasible suggestion for our country member right system consummation. This paper consists of the following five chapters: the first chapter is the definition of the concept and nature of membership rights. On the basis of "ternary theory", both "material law theory" and "person law nature theory" are difficult to contain the nature of membership rights. Membership rights should be classified into the category of membership rights, which is an independent new civil right which is different from traditional civil rights. The second chapter is a comparative study on the legal system of the exercise of membership rights in foreign countries and Taiwan. The system of exercising member rights in western countries is deeply influenced by the theory of "separation of powers". What is generally established is the three-tiered mode of power organ, executive organ and supervision organ. The German "Law on Housing ownership" regards the owner of the house as an independent administrative organ, and France has more flexible and diverse regulations on the composition of the administrative organ, as well as the sleek setting of the supervisory system in various countries, and so on. It is worth studying and learning selectively when legislating in our country. The third chapter is about the existing problems in the exercise of the member right in the building ownership division in our country. Because of the loopholes in the current law, there are problems in the exercise of the member's right in practice. The fourth chapter is the theoretical analysis of the exercise of membership rights. Management group is the executive body of the member right. At present, all countries tend to recognize that the management group has legal personality, which is convenient for the management group to exercise its administrative power including economic activities and judicial activities in its own name. Differentiation between owners in the premise of not violating mandatory provisions, according to the needs of their own choice of management, which also reflects the spirit of owner autonomy. As a policy-making and executive organ, the owners' Congress and the owners' committee are the important guarantee to maintain the normal exercise of membership rights. The fifth chapter is the perfection of the exercise system of the member right of building division ownership in our country. In view of the problems in the exercise of members' rights, it is imperative to issue a law of building condominium, perfect the convening mechanism of the owners' Congress, clarify the legal status of the industrial committee, and establish the supervisory organization to truly safeguard the owners' rights and interests.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.2

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭金雄;論抵押物拍賣的若干法律問題[J];法律適用(國家法官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2002年10期

2 程建樂;朱章程;;論建筑物區(qū)分所有形態(tài)之下小區(qū)停車位的權(quán)屬[J];法律適用;2009年07期

3 黃小平;楊津;;芻議《物權(quán)法》中的占有制度[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年12期

4 張安毅;;物權(quán)法與和諧社會(huì)中的誠信建設(shè)[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年19期

5 趙劍;;從“物權(quán)憑證”的真實(shí)含義看提單的法律性質(zhì)[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年18期

6 朱珍華;贓物善意取得制度及其保護(hù)[J];河北公安警察職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

7 《公寓化住宅法律關(guān)系問題研究》課題組;熊華興;郝晶;;公寓化住宅所有權(quán)人間的團(tuán)體關(guān)系問題探析[J];廣東培正學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

8 凌曉東;;物業(yè)管理前期介入的作用[J];工程與建設(shè);2006年S1期

9 江涌;贓款、贓物及其時(shí)效取得——兼評(píng)《物權(quán)法》草案的相關(guān)規(guī)定[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年06期

10 胡衛(wèi);;論重大自然災(zāi)害作為合同免責(zé)事由的原因力[J];貴州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前6條

1 柴朝文;;對(duì)天津市“宅基地?fù)Q房”法律特征的理解[A];轉(zhuǎn)型與重構(gòu)——2011中國城市規(guī)劃年會(huì)論文集[C];2011年

2 叢偉華;;論住宅小區(qū)業(yè)主所有權(quán)[A];第三屆中國律師論壇論文集（實(shí)務(wù)卷）[C];2003年

3 金海統(tǒng);;自然資源使用權(quán):一個(gè)反思性的檢討[A];可持續(xù)發(fā)展·環(huán)境保護(hù)·防災(zāi)減災(zāi)——2012年全國環(huán)境資源法學(xué)研究會(huì)（年會(huì)）論文集[C];2012年

4 金儉;呂，

本文編號(hào)：1923976