本文選題：涉外網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán) + 管轄規(guī)則�。� 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)的發(fā)展給人們的生活帶來了巨大的變革,小到日常的衣食住行,大到社會各領(lǐng)域的發(fā)展,網(wǎng)絡(luò)的身影隨處可見。但在提供便利的同時,網(wǎng)絡(luò)也給我國的傳統(tǒng)法律制度帶來了挑戰(zhàn),其中就包括涉外網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)案件的管轄權(quán)問題。網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的虛擬性、全球性和無邊界性等特點,使得網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)管轄權(quán)表現(xiàn)出了與傳統(tǒng)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)不同的法律特征,從而對我國現(xiàn)行的管轄規(guī)則產(chǎn)生了巨大的沖擊。本文共分為四個部分,第一部分引入典型案例“中國大百科全書出版社訴蘋果公司侵犯著作權(quán)案”,介紹了基本案情,并指出案例的爭議焦點:我國法院行使管轄權(quán)的法律依據(jù)是否正確和傳統(tǒng)侵權(quán)的管轄規(guī)則能否適用于本案。第二部分是對案件爭議焦點的分析,介紹了處理傳統(tǒng)侵權(quán)案件的管轄原則,網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)的特點以及涉外網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)對傳統(tǒng)管轄原則的沖擊。并對美國、德國、法國等國在處理涉外網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)案件時的立法實踐作了介紹和總結(jié),對其利弊進(jìn)行分析,著重說明了美國的立法實踐對我國的借鑒意義。第三部分是本案的分析與結(jié)論,在前文分析和總結(jié)的基礎(chǔ)上,對案例進(jìn)行了分析,得出我國雖然能夠取得本案的管轄權(quán),但管轄依據(jù)上卻存在瑕疵。第四部分對構(gòu)建我國涉外網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)案件管轄制度提出建議,即將原告住所地作為管轄依據(jù),并引進(jìn)不方便法院原則對原告訴權(quán)進(jìn)行限制,同時借鑒美國的“指定目標(biāo)檢驗標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”,以期早日完善我國的網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)管轄制度。
[Abstract]:The development of network technology has brought great changes to people's life, from daily food, clothing, housing and transportation, to the development of various fields of society, the network can be seen everywhere. But at the same time, the network also brings challenges to the traditional legal system of our country, including the jurisdiction of the foreign network copyright infringement cases. The characteristics of cyberspace, such as fictitious, global and boundless, make the jurisdiction of network copyright infringement show different legal characteristics from the traditional copyright infringement, which has a great impact on the current jurisdiction rules of our country. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part introduces a typical case, China Encyclopedia Publishing House v. Apple Corporation infringement of copyright, and introduces the basic facts of the case. It also points out that the dispute focus of the case is whether the legal basis for the exercise of jurisdiction by Chinese courts is correct or not and whether the jurisdiction rules of traditional tort can be applied to the case. The second part is the analysis of the focus of the case dispute, introduces the jurisdiction principle of dealing with the traditional infringement cases, the characteristics of network copyright infringement and the impact of foreign network copyright infringement on the traditional jurisdiction principle. It also introduces and summarizes the legislative practice of the United States, Germany, France and other countries in dealing with foreign network copyright infringement cases, analyzes its advantages and disadvantages, and emphatically explains the reference significance of American legislative practice to our country. The third part is the analysis and conclusion of the case, on the basis of the previous analysis and summary, the case is analyzed, and it is concluded that although our country can obtain the jurisdiction of the case, the jurisdictional basis is flawed. The fourth part puts forward some suggestions to construct the jurisdiction system of foreign network copyright infringement cases in our country, that is, the plaintiff's domicile is the basis of jurisdiction, and the principle of inconvenient court is introduced to restrict the plaintiff's right of action. At the same time, reference is made to the designated target test standard in order to improve the jurisdiction system of network copyright infringement in our country as soon as possible.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923;D923.41

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;關(guān)于反對著作權(quán)侵權(quán)的聲明[J];上海市政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2001年04期

2 戴紹業(yè);;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)案件管轄問題淺析[J];福建法學(xué);2001年03期

3 王素娟;對目前網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)案件的法律分析[J];法律適用(國家法官學(xué)院學(xué)報);2002年07期

4 王云麗,黃月明;試論認(rèn)定著作權(quán)侵權(quán)行為的歸責(zé)原則[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年04期

5 高之;對“中國期刊數(shù)據(jù)庫”著作權(quán)侵權(quán)案的法律評析[J];軟件世界;2003年07期

6 段煉;網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播中的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)行為分析[J];傳媒觀察;2003年05期

7 李毅鴻;音樂著作權(quán)侵權(quán)的認(rèn)定問題研究[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2005年01期

8 孟U，

本文編號：1923926