本文選題：著作權(quán) + 合理使用判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)　； 參考：《華南理工大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：合理使用制度是各國(guó)著作權(quán)法中通行的一項(xiàng)著作權(quán)限制制度,同時(shí)也是在理論和實(shí)務(wù)研究中的一項(xiàng)最易引起爭(zhēng)議的規(guī)則。在技術(shù)和網(wǎng)絡(luò)的不斷發(fā)展過(guò)程中,更表現(xiàn)出了前所未有的復(fù)雜性和多樣性。在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下提合理使用的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn),就必須面對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)和技術(shù)對(duì)于合理使用制度的沖擊和挑戰(zhàn),也不能忽視網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中作品形式、市場(chǎng)范圍、使用方式等因素的特殊性。因此,我們應(yīng)當(dāng)破除傳統(tǒng)合理使用判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中表達(dá)方式的局限性,提煉出隱含在文字背后的最本質(zhì)、最核心的因素,并形成一個(gè)更具開(kāi)放性的原則性合理使用判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn),以適應(yīng)時(shí)代需求。因此,在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境的大背景之下,本文以合理使用制度的價(jià)值目標(biāo)為導(dǎo)向,以著作權(quán)人和使用者之間的利益平衡為需求,采用了比較分析法、案例分析法以及價(jià)值分析法,從法理學(xué)、經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的視角論證了合理使用的核心問(wèn)題——也就是合理使用判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的問(wèn)題,并提出了相關(guān)的立法建議。本文主體部分共四章。其中,第一章主要對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外傳統(tǒng)的合理使用立法例進(jìn)行了闡釋;第二章主要從網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中的著作權(quán)擴(kuò)張和技術(shù)保護(hù)措施這兩個(gè)方面來(lái)分析了網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下合理使用判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)所面臨的挑戰(zhàn);第三章則以網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境為背景,從使用目的和性質(zhì)、作品的性質(zhì)與使用方式、著作權(quán)人遭受的不利益和使用者獲得的利益等方面來(lái)對(duì)合理使用的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行了重新的解讀,并結(jié)合實(shí)例論證了在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下對(duì)這些因素進(jìn)行重新解讀的必要性和可行性;第四章則根據(jù)主觀與客觀、內(nèi)部與外部的區(qū)分,從使用目的的替代性、作品本身價(jià)值的替代性和市場(chǎng)價(jià)值的替代性這三個(gè)方面來(lái)展開(kāi)對(duì)使用行為的合理性分析,得出了本文的結(jié)論,包括應(yīng)當(dāng)納入合理使用立法的三條“替代性”判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、應(yīng)當(dāng)增加的合理使用的新類型、對(duì)現(xiàn)有立法進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步完善的建議。以此,希望能夠找到網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)人和使用者之間的利益平衡點(diǎn),并為將來(lái)的立法和司法活動(dòng)提供一些有益的借鑒。
[Abstract]:Fair use system is a copyright restriction system in copyright law of various countries, and it is also the most controversial rule in theoretical and practical research. In the process of continuous development of technology and network, it shows unprecedented complexity and diversity. In the network environment, we must face the impact and challenge of the network and technology to the system of rational use, and we can not ignore the particularity of the form of works, the scope of market, the mode of use and so on in the network environment. Therefore, we should break down the limitations of the traditional rational use of the standard of expression, extract the most essential and core factors hidden behind the text, and form a more open standard of rational use of principle. To meet the needs of the times. Therefore, under the background of the network environment, this paper takes the value goal of the reasonable use system as the direction, takes the interests balance between the copyright owner and the user as the demand, adopts the comparative analysis method, the case analysis method and the value analysis method. From the perspective of jurisprudence and economics, this paper demonstrates the core problem of rational use, that is, the issue of rational use of judgment criteria, and puts forward relevant legislative suggestions. There are four chapters in the main part of this paper. Among them, the first chapter mainly explains the traditional legislation of rational use at home and abroad. The second chapter mainly analyzes the challenges faced by the judgment standard of rational use in the network environment from the aspects of copyright expansion and technical protection measures in cyberspace, while the third chapter takes the network environment as the background, and analyzes the purpose and nature of the use. The nature and use of the work, the non-interest suffered by the copyright owner and the interests obtained by the user, etc., are re-interpreted to judge the reasonable use of the work. The necessity and feasibility of reinterpreting these factors in the network environment are demonstrated. Chapter four is based on the distinction between subjective and objective, internal and external, from the alternative of the purpose of use. This paper analyzes the rationality of the use behavior from the three aspects of the substitution of the value of the work itself and the substitution of the market value, and draws the conclusion of this paper, including the three criteria of "substitution" which should be included in the legislation of rational use. New types of rational use should be added to the recommendations for further improvement of existing legislation. In this way, we hope to find the balance of interests between copyright owners and users in the network environment, and provide some useful reference for future legislation and judicial activities.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 關(guān)永紅;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)一般效力論要[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2013年01期

2 馮曉青;;著作權(quán)合理使用制度之正當(dāng)性研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2009年04期

3 姚鶴徽;;交易成本和價(jià)格歧視理論在著作權(quán)合理使用中的定位與適用[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2012年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1911866