本文選題：飼養(yǎng)人 + 管理人�。� 參考：《延邊大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：動物侵權(quán)是比較典型且古老的侵權(quán)類型,早在古羅馬時期就有對動物侵權(quán)的相關(guān)規(guī)定。近代以來,法國、德國、英國和其他一些國家(地區(qū))也對動物侵權(quán)責(zé)任作出了規(guī)定,在2009年我國頒布的《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》對飼養(yǎng)動物侵權(quán)作了具體的規(guī)定。確定承擔(dān)動物侵權(quán)責(zé)任的主體是合理分配責(zé)任的前提。本文在對飼養(yǎng)動物范圍,主體承擔(dān)責(zé)任的理論基礎(chǔ)等做相關(guān)研究的基礎(chǔ)上,對動物侵權(quán)的責(zé)任主體做進一步討論尤其是對管理人和飼養(yǎng)人不是同一人的情況,在遵循“控制力為中心”的基礎(chǔ)上,分別對租賃、保管、雇傭等關(guān)系下的飼養(yǎng)人、管理人的責(zé)任分擔(dān)做具體分析,而對于流浪動物,則分析了投喂人和安全保障義務(wù)人的責(zé)任,對于投喂人,在其未對動物行為做不合理干預(yù)或未擴大動物危險的情況下,不應(yīng)課以過多的注意義務(wù)。本文認(rèn)為我國當(dāng)前的立法存在危險動物界定不明,飼養(yǎng)人、管理人規(guī)定不科學(xué),《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》82條對流浪動物規(guī)定可操作性不強等問題,并提出了出臺司法解釋統(tǒng)一危險動物范圍,科學(xué)的對口語化飼養(yǎng)人、管理人進行概念解釋,通過完善動物登記管理制度及建立相應(yīng)的動物管理基金來救助流浪動物侵權(quán)的受害人以及通過基金對流浪動物的救助、收容能夠減少流浪動物數(shù)量,從根源上減輕流浪動物侵權(quán)問題。
[Abstract]:Animal tort is a typical and ancient type of tort. Since modern times, France, Germany, Britain and some other countries (regions) have also made provisions on animal tort liability. In 2009, the Tort liability Law promulgated in China made specific provisions on animal breeding tort. To determine the subject of animal tort liability is the premise of reasonable allocation of liability. On the basis of the relevant research on the scope of animal breeding and the theoretical basis of the main body to bear responsibility, this paper makes a further discussion on the subject of animal tort liability, especially on the situation that the manager and the breeder are not the same person. On the basis of following the principle of "control as the center," this paper makes a specific analysis of the responsibility sharing of the breeders and managers under the relationship of lease, custody, employment, etc., while for the stray animals, it analyzes the responsibilities of the feeder and the security obligor. In the case of feeding people, there should be no excessive duty of care if they do not interfere unreasonably with animal behavior or increase the risk of animals. This paper holds that the current legislation of our country has some problems, such as unclear definition of dangerous animals, unscientific regulations of breeders and managers, and poor maneuverability of 82 articles of the Tort liability Law for stray animals. And put forward a judicial interpretation to unify the scope of dangerous animals, scientifically explain the concept of colloquial breeders and managers. By perfecting the animal registration management system and establishing the corresponding animal management fund to help the victims of the stray animal infringement and the rescue of the stray animal through the fund, the shelter can reduce the number of the stray animals. From the root to alleviate the problem of torts of stray animals.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 韓強;;流浪動物損害責(zé)任的個案解析[J];法商研究;2013年04期

，

本文編號：1903050