本文選題：優(yōu)先權(quán) + 性質(zhì)　； 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：在我國物權(quán)法出臺之前,學(xué)者對于應(yīng)不應(yīng)當(dāng)確定優(yōu)先權(quán)制度曾經(jīng)有過激烈的討論。最終物權(quán)法并未涉及優(yōu)先權(quán)制度,主要原因是對優(yōu)先權(quán)的性質(zhì)認(rèn)識不夠清晰,從而難以確定它的立法定位。本文首先從優(yōu)先權(quán)的概念界定出發(fā)。對優(yōu)先權(quán)的不同稱謂和不同內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行分析,并研究優(yōu)先權(quán)在各種法律歷史上的發(fā)展嬗變,找出優(yōu)先權(quán)的核心內(nèi)涵。在此基礎(chǔ)上結(jié)合我國目前社會狀況,對優(yōu)先權(quán)理論進(jìn)行凈化梳理,提出我們目前應(yīng)建立的優(yōu)先權(quán)概念實際上是指一般優(yōu)先權(quán)。在厘清概念的前提下進(jìn)一步分析優(yōu)先權(quán)的性質(zhì)。提出優(yōu)先權(quán)是一項獨(dú)立的權(quán)利,是一項實體性的權(quán)利。但是,其既非債權(quán),亦非物權(quán),而是一種“保護(hù)權(quán)利的權(quán)利”,即救濟(jì)性權(quán)利,在性質(zhì)上應(yīng)屬于形成權(quán)。接下來分析優(yōu)先權(quán)的立法定位。首先明確了建立統(tǒng)一優(yōu)先權(quán)制度的意義。之后根據(jù)優(yōu)先權(quán)的性質(zhì),認(rèn)為它不宜規(guī)定在物權(quán)或者債權(quán)部分。應(yīng)當(dāng)在總則中增設(shè)權(quán)利的保護(hù)部分,并將統(tǒng)一優(yōu)先權(quán)制度納入其中。最后結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)實及學(xué)者建議提出了我國所應(yīng)建立的優(yōu)先權(quán)制度的理論框架。
[Abstract]:Before the enactment of property Law in China, scholars had a heated discussion on whether to determine the priority system. The main reason is that the nature of priority is not clear enough, so it is difficult to determine its legislative position. This paper begins with the definition of priority. This paper analyzes the different appellations and connotations of priority, studies the development and evolution of priority in various legal history, and finds out the core connotation of priority. On this basis, combining the current social situation of our country, the theory of priority is purified and combed, and the concept of priority that we should establish at present is actually referring to the general priority. On the premise of clarifying the concept, the nature of priority is further analyzed. Putting forward priority is an independent right and a substantive right. However, it is neither a creditor's right nor a real right, but a "right to protect rights", that is, the right of relief, which belongs to the right of formation in nature. Then it analyzes the legislative orientation of priority. First of all, the significance of establishing a unified priority system is clarified. Then according to the nature of priority, it should not be stipulated in real right or creditor's rights. The protection of rights should be added to the general principles and the uniform priority system should be included. Finally, the theoretical framework of the priority system is put forward according to the reality of our country and the suggestions of the scholars.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 申衛(wèi)星;我國優(yōu)先權(quán)制度立法研究[J];法學(xué)評論;1997年06期

2 于海涌;;法國抵押權(quán)和優(yōu)先權(quán)的公示制度研究[J];私法;2004年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 鮑軼欣;民事優(yōu)先權(quán)性質(zhì)研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：1892070