本文選題：商標(biāo)侵權(quán) + 懲罰性賠償�。� 參考：《天津師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：伴隨著現(xiàn)階段我國經(jīng)濟的快速發(fā)展,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域侵權(quán)的案件頻繁地發(fā)生,尤其是商標(biāo)領(lǐng)域侵權(quán)的案件更是屢見不鮮。在立法制度不完善以及商標(biāo)權(quán)本身無形性、可復(fù)制性等特點導(dǎo)致被侵權(quán)行為難以認(rèn)定判賠的背景下,2014年5月頒布實施的《商標(biāo)法》規(guī)定了商標(biāo)侵權(quán)損害的懲罰性賠償,本文中對懲罰性賠償制度的法律解釋和相關(guān)的具體實踐是我們要研究的重點,筆者擬從文理性、比較性研究和司法實踐等方面對懲罰性賠償制度做探討。第一部分,首先探明商標(biāo)侵權(quán)懲罰性賠償?shù)幕靖拍顔栴},在了解懲罰性賠償制度制定的立法背景的前提下,借鑒國外主流觀點和國內(nèi)學(xué)者研究,得出其含義是指侵權(quán)人即賠償義務(wù)主體對被侵權(quán)人給予超過其實際損失的金錢性賠償,以達(dá)到對侵權(quán)人懲罰的效果;其次是在認(rèn)知懲罰性賠償制度本身具有的懲罰性等功能的前提下與一般的罰款和法定賠償間的關(guān)系,以探究該制度的合理性。第二部分,商標(biāo)侵權(quán)懲罰性賠償主觀方面的研究,根據(jù)《商標(biāo)法》第63條中懲罰性賠償適用的主觀條件是要求侵權(quán)人有明顯的主觀"惡意",結(jié)合《著作權(quán)法征求意見稿》和《專利法修改草案》中對主觀方面"故意"的要求,對"惡意"和"故意"的程度性進(jìn)行比較以及對其合理性進(jìn)行分析;其次主觀方面的評判標(biāo)準(zhǔn)必然也還要物化到客觀標(biāo)準(zhǔn)評判,因此還把"惡意"和"情節(jié)嚴(yán)重"這主客觀兩者之間的關(guān)聯(lián)性明晰了界限,是否可以在判定"惡意"時參考刑事標(biāo)準(zhǔn)也是值得深究的。第三部分,由于前述"惡意"是主觀方面的動因,由"惡意"的主觀犯意所實施的行為若要受到嚴(yán)格的懲罰必然后果是"情節(jié)嚴(yán)重"的,"情節(jié)嚴(yán)重"、是否可以具體化為從時間、次數(shù)、數(shù)額、領(lǐng)域等因素進(jìn)行認(rèn)定,結(jié)合相關(guān)的司法實踐研究可以得出相應(yīng)合理的結(jié)論。第四部分,這一部分主要是對懲罰性賠償?shù)淖罱K數(shù)額計算問題做闡述,包括數(shù)額計算標(biāo)準(zhǔn)問題的確定和參考因素的分析,結(jié)合其他法系國家和地區(qū)的相關(guān)法律規(guī)定和實踐對我國新《商標(biāo)法》63條判賠方面的難以操作性加以明確,并針對這些問題考慮相關(guān)因素,以在司法實踐中確定一個相對穩(wěn)定的計算模式,以實現(xiàn)遏制侵權(quán)人的不法侵害行為,維護(hù)商標(biāo)權(quán)人合法權(quán)益的目的。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of our economy at present, the infringement cases in the field of intellectual property occur frequently, especially in the field of trademark infringement. Under the background of imperfect legislative system, imperceptible and replicable trademark rights, which make it difficult to determine the award and compensation for infringement, the Trademark Law promulgated and implemented in May 2014 stipulates the punitive damages for trademark infringement damage. In this paper, the legal interpretation of punitive damages system and relevant specific practice is the focus of our study, the author intends to explore the punitive damages system from the aspects of literary rationality, comparative research and judicial practice. The first part, first of all, explores the basic concept of punitive damages for trademark infringement, on the premise of understanding the legislative background of punitive damages system, draw lessons from the mainstream views of foreign countries and domestic scholars to study. The meaning of it is that the infringer, namely, the subject of the obligation of compensation, gives the infringer monetary compensation in excess of his actual loss, so as to achieve the effect of punishing the infringer. Secondly, on the premise of recognizing the punitive function of punitive damages system itself, the relationship between punitive damages and general fines and statutory damages is discussed in order to explore the rationality of the system. The second part, the research on the subjective aspects of punitive damages for trademark infringement, According to the subjective condition of applying punitive damages in Article 63 of the Trademark Law is to require the infringer to have obvious subjective "malice", combined with the subjective "wilful" requirements in the draft for soliciting opinions of the copyright Law and the revised draft of the Patent Law, The degree of "malice" and "intention" is compared and its rationality is analyzed. Therefore, the relationship between "malice" and "serious circumstances" is clearly defined, and it is worth studying whether we can refer to criminal standards when judging "malice". The third part, because the aforementioned "malice" is the subjective motivation, if the acts committed by the subjective criminal intent of "malice" are to be strictly punished, the inevitable consequence is "the circumstances are serious" and "the circumstances are serious", can it be concretely changed from time to time? Number, amount, field and other factors, combined with the relevant judicial practice can be concluded. In the fourth part, this part mainly expounds the calculation of the final amount of punitive damages, including the determination of the standard of calculation of the amount and the analysis of the reference factors. Combined with the relevant legal provisions and practices of other legal system countries and regions, the article 63 of the new Trademark Law of China is difficult to operate, and the relevant factors are considered in view of these problems. In order to determine a relatively stable calculation model in judicial practice, the purpose of curbing the infringer's illegal infringement and safeguarding the legal rights and interests of the trademark owner is achieved.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.43

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 譚極;懲罰性賠償與中國商標(biāo)侵權(quán)救濟制度[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2014年

，

本文編號：1877340