本文選題：民法總則 + 基本規(guī)定�。� 參考：《中國高校社會科學(xué)》2017年05期

【摘要】：《民法總則》"基本規(guī)定"的多數(shù)條文淵源于《民法通則》"基本原則"一章,但又有所發(fā)展和創(chuàng)新,如確認(rèn)了"公序良俗"概念,創(chuàng)立了"生態(tài)環(huán)境保護(hù)原則",調(diào)整了民法法源體系,確立了特別法優(yōu)于一般法規(guī)則等。我們應(yīng)當(dāng)充分而合理地認(rèn)識"基本規(guī)定",尤其是其中立法目的和基本原則的功能。立法目的及基本原則條款并非法官的裁判依據(jù),不能充任司法三段論中的大前提,其功能在于法律解釋和漏洞補(bǔ)充�！睹穹ǹ倓t》將這些條款明文化,有減少爭議、便利解釋的功效,但應(yīng)當(dāng)防止法律目的和法律價值固化的危險。立法之后,學(xué)者應(yīng)當(dāng)以解釋論為基本立場,做一個解釋論意義上的積極建設(shè)者。
[Abstract]:The majority of the articles "general rules of the civil law" are derived from the chapter of the general principles of the civil law, but they have been developed and innovating. For example, the concept of "public order and good customs" has been confirmed, the "ecological environment protection principle" has been established, the source system of civil law has been adjusted, and the special law is better than the general law rules. The purpose and basic principles of the legislative purpose and basic principles are not the basis of the judge's referee, which can not serve as the precondition of the judicial syllogism, and its function lies in legal interpretation and loophole supplement. The general principles of the civil law have the effect of reducing disputes and facilitating interpretation, but should be prevented. The danger of legal purpose and legal value solidify. After legislation, scholars should take interpretative theory as their basic standpoint and be an active constructor of interpretative significance.

【作者單位】： 中國政法大學(xué)民商經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：北京市社科基金重大項目“民法基本原則的適用研究”(15ZDA40)成果
【分類號】：D923.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 張成森;;淺議商法在現(xiàn)代的基本原則[J];知識經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年05期

2 王斌;;簡議商法的三大基本原則[J];四川省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年04期

3 鄭琳;;營利性原則作為商法基本原則的法理思考[J];商品與質(zhì)量;2010年SC期

4 鄭昆白;;論現(xiàn)代商法的基本原則[J];巢湖學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年04期

，

本文編號：1872285