本文選題：見義勇為 + 責(zé)任豁免��； 參考：《福建師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)今社會(huì)中,許多見義勇為者由于我國(guó)法律責(zé)任豁免條款的局限性,最終承擔(dān)了本不應(yīng)承擔(dān)的法律責(zé)任。這樣的結(jié)果導(dǎo)致了十分消極的社會(huì)影響,引發(fā)了對(duì)待陌生人救助問題的大眾冷漠。面對(duì)這一亟待解決的困境,完善見義勇為者的責(zé)任豁免相關(guān)立法,成了解決這一難題的關(guān)鍵鑰匙。要達(dá)成這一目的,需要對(duì)以下幾個(gè)方面的問題進(jìn)行深入探討：見義勇為的概念和性質(zhì)應(yīng)如何界定、我國(guó)現(xiàn)行立法對(duì)于保護(hù)見義勇為者豁免權(quán)的局限于何處以及如何全方位地完善我國(guó)對(duì)見義勇為者責(zé)任豁免的立法。本文闡析了見義勇為和免責(zé)事由相關(guān)的法理學(xué)、民法學(xué)理論,并結(jié)合各國(guó)的立法實(shí)踐,對(duì)完善我國(guó)見義勇為者責(zé)任豁免的立法進(jìn)行了較為系統(tǒng)的探討。在現(xiàn)有研究基礎(chǔ)之上,對(duì)見義勇為者責(zé)任豁免的適用條件和適用情形等理論依據(jù)進(jìn)行分析,找出現(xiàn)有的民事法律制度中對(duì)見義勇為者豁免權(quán)規(guī)定的不足之處。在此基礎(chǔ)上構(gòu)建我國(guó)完善見義勇為者責(zé)任豁免立法的思路,如進(jìn)行全國(guó)性的見義勇為統(tǒng)一立法,并在該法案中設(shè)立對(duì)見義勇為者責(zé)任豁免的條款,以期對(duì)我國(guó)見義勇為的未來立法及其司法實(shí)踐有所幫助。
[Abstract]:In today's society, many brave and righteous people bear the legal responsibility which should not be taken up because of the limitation of the exemption clause of legal liability in our country. This has led to very negative social effects, triggering public indifference to the problem of stranger rescue. In the face of this dilemma, perfecting the relevant legislation on the exemption of responsibility of the valiant has become the key to solve this problem. In order to achieve this goal, the following aspects need to be explored in depth: how to define the concept and nature of courage for good, The limitation of our current legislation on the protection of immunity of the righteous and brave and how to improve our legislation on the exemption of the responsibility of the righteous. This paper expounds the jurisprudence, civil law theory and the legislative practice of various countries, and probes into how to perfect the legislation on the exemption of the responsibility of the righteous and the brave in our country. On the basis of the existing research, this paper analyzes the applicable conditions and the applicable circumstances of the exemption from the liability of the righteous, and finds out the deficiencies of the immunity of the righteous in some civil legal systems. On the basis of this, the author constructs the train of thought of perfecting the exemption legislation of the responsibility of the righteous brave, such as carrying on the national uniform legislation of the righteous brave, and establishing the clause of the exemption from the responsibility of the righteous brave in the bill. It is expected to be helpful to the future legislation and judicial practice of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 陳清;;大陸法系侵權(quán)法上救助義務(wù)研究[J];北方法學(xué);2012年03期

2 何姝;;論見義勇為受益人的民事責(zé)任[J];湖南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

3 鄭麗清;;法律論域下“見義勇為”概念的厘立[J];廣西社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年04期

4 關(guān)今華,林金貴;見義勇為及人身損害救濟(jì)問題研究[J];莆田學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張S徭，

本文編號(hào)：1849488