本文選題：動(dòng)產(chǎn) + 讓與擔(dān)保�。� 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：信用是現(xiàn)代社會(huì)資本流通的前提,而商業(yè)信用的建立和維持又需要擔(dān)保制度的支撐。隨著市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的不斷發(fā)展、動(dòng)產(chǎn)(原材料、庫存商品、機(jī)器設(shè)備等等)的價(jià)值與日俱增,世界各國均在為尋求更加完備的動(dòng)產(chǎn)擔(dān)保方式而努力,動(dòng)產(chǎn)讓與擔(dān)保制度應(yīng)運(yùn)而生。本文結(jié)構(gòu)共分為五大部分:第一部分為動(dòng)產(chǎn)讓與擔(dān)保概述,首先對(duì)動(dòng)產(chǎn)讓與擔(dān)保的概念作了界定,然后闡述了其具體的法律特征,并與相關(guān)制度如動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押、代物清償預(yù)約、所有權(quán)保留進(jìn)行了對(duì)比,從而有利于更好地把握動(dòng)產(chǎn)讓與擔(dān)保制度。第二部分為動(dòng)產(chǎn)讓與擔(dān)保的設(shè)立與消滅,動(dòng)產(chǎn)讓與擔(dān)保的設(shè)立有四要件:設(shè)立主體即設(shè)立契約的當(dāng)事人、被擔(dān)保債權(quán)、擔(dān)保標(biāo)的及設(shè)立行為。動(dòng)產(chǎn)讓與擔(dān)保的消滅主要有四大原因:被擔(dān)保債權(quán)的消滅、標(biāo)的動(dòng)產(chǎn)的滅失、讓與擔(dān)保的實(shí)行及讓與擔(dān)保權(quán)人的放棄。第三部分為動(dòng)產(chǎn)讓與擔(dān)保的效力,以日本學(xué)界及實(shí)務(wù)界中的動(dòng)產(chǎn)讓與擔(dān)保制度展開。其效力分為對(duì)內(nèi)效力和對(duì)外效力兩方面。具體而言,對(duì)內(nèi)效力即契約當(dāng)事人之間的權(quán)利義務(wù)關(guān)系,包括被擔(dān)保債權(quán)的范圍、效力所及的標(biāo)的物范圍、標(biāo)的動(dòng)產(chǎn)的占有使用關(guān)系及保管關(guān)系、優(yōu)先受償權(quán)等;對(duì)外效力主要包括動(dòng)產(chǎn)讓與擔(dān)保對(duì)當(dāng)事人債權(quán)人的效力以及除當(dāng)事人債權(quán)人之外的第三人的效力兩方面。在闡述日本動(dòng)產(chǎn)讓與擔(dān)保制度內(nèi)外效力的同時(shí)提出了自己對(duì)相關(guān)問題的看法并就中國司法實(shí)務(wù)中出現(xiàn)類似情形下的處理方式以現(xiàn)行中國法為基礎(chǔ)提出了自己的建議。第四部分為集合動(dòng)產(chǎn)讓與擔(dān)保。某種程度而言,集合動(dòng)產(chǎn)讓與擔(dān)保已成為日本動(dòng)產(chǎn)讓與擔(dān)保制度的主流。首先,對(duì)集合動(dòng)產(chǎn)讓與擔(dān)保的概念予以界定,然后就集合動(dòng)產(chǎn)讓與擔(dān)保的設(shè)定和效力中區(qū)別于一般動(dòng)產(chǎn)讓與擔(dān)保的地方重點(diǎn)闡述,最后與我國《物權(quán)法》中的特別動(dòng)產(chǎn)集合抵押制度進(jìn)行對(duì)比。第五部分為結(jié)語部分。筆者以我國司法實(shí)務(wù)中的案例為出發(fā)點(diǎn),通過數(shù)據(jù)分析的方式對(duì)我國司法實(shí)務(wù)中涉及讓與擔(dān)保的案例做了樣本性的統(tǒng)計(jì),并以此為基礎(chǔ)提出了筆者對(duì)動(dòng)產(chǎn)讓與擔(dān)保制度是否應(yīng)當(dāng)引進(jìn)以及如何規(guī)制的看法。
[Abstract]:Credit is the premise of capital circulation in modern society, and the establishment and maintenance of commercial credit need the support of guarantee system. With the continuous development of market economy, the value of movable property (raw materials, inventory goods, machinery and equipment, etc.) is increasing day by day. Countries all over the world are working hard to find a more complete form of chattel guarantee, and the chattel transfer guarantee system emerges as the times require. The structure of this paper is divided into five parts: the first part is an overview of chattel transfer guarantee. Firstly, it defines the concept of chattel transfer guarantee, and then expounds its specific legal characteristics, and makes a reservation with related systems such as chattel mortgage, payment of goods on behalf of property. The retention of title is compared, which is conducive to better grasp of the chattel transfer guarantee system. The second part is about the establishment and elimination of chattel assignment guarantee. There are four elements in the establishment of chattel assignment guarantee: the party who establishes the contract, the secured creditor's rights, the subject matter of security and the establishment behavior. There are four main reasons for the elimination of chattel security: the elimination of secured creditor's rights, the loss of the underlying movable property, the implementation of transferable security and the abandonment of the transferor of the security right. The third part is the validity of chattel transfer guarantee, which is based on the system of chattel transfer guarantee in Japanese academic and practical circles. Its effectiveness is divided into two aspects: internal effectiveness and external effectiveness. Specifically, the internal validity is the relationship of rights and obligations between the parties to the contract, including the scope of secured creditor's rights, the scope of the subject matter of the validity, the relation of possession and use of the subject matter of movable property, the relationship of custody, the priority of the right to be repaid, and so on. The external effect mainly includes the validity of the chattel assignment guarantee to the party creditor and the effect of the third party except the party creditor. This paper expounds the internal and external effects of Japanese chattel transfer security system and puts forward his own views on relevant issues and puts forward his own suggestions on the treatment of similar situations in Chinese judicial practice on the basis of the current Chinese law. The fourth part is the collection of movable property transfer security. To some extent, collective chattel transfer guarantee has become the mainstream of Japanese chattel transfer guarantee system. First of all, the concept of collective chattel transfer security is defined, and then the creation and effect of collective movable property transfer security are discussed in detail, which are different from ordinary movable property transfer security. Finally, it contrasts with the special chattel collective mortgage system in Real right Law of our country. The fifth part is the conclusion. Based on the case of judicial practice in our country, the author makes a sample statistics on the cases involving transfer guarantee in the judicial practice of our country through the way of data analysis. On this basis, the author puts forward the author's views on whether the chattel transfer guarantee system should be introduced and how to regulate it.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.2;D931.3;DD913

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊潔,崔聰聰;論讓與擔(dān)保[J];廣西社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

2 黃茜;論我國讓與擔(dān)保制度的創(chuàng)設(shè)[J];安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年05期

3 于文萍,李碧春;我國設(shè)立讓與擔(dān)保制度的法律思考[J];前沿;2004年12期

4 汪淵智,陳敏;略論讓與擔(dān)保制度在我國的確立[J];山西省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

5 敖冬梅;我國讓與擔(dān)保法律制度的構(gòu)建[J];廣東財(cái)經(jīng)職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年05期

6 陳祥健;尊從個(gè)性:讓與擔(dān)保權(quán)實(shí)行中的兩大爭(zhēng)議及其選擇[J];亞太經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年02期

7 齊恩平;讓與擔(dān)保與按揭法律制度比較研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2005年03期

8 脫劍鋒,楊衛(wèi)華;讓與擔(dān)保制度的爭(zhēng)議點(diǎn)及我國的對(duì)策[J];社科縱橫;2005年02期

9 汪水偉;唐莉;;讓與擔(dān)保的獨(dú)立價(jià)值及其表現(xiàn)[J];甘肅科技縱橫;2006年02期

10 郭侃;;對(duì)讓與擔(dān)保法律制度的初淺探[J];科協(xié)論壇(下半月);2007年06期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 范國平;;論讓與擔(dān)保制度[A];第四屆中國律師論壇百篇優(yōu)秀論文集[C];2004年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前8條

1 ;“按揭”與“讓與擔(dān)保”[N];工人日?qǐng)?bào);2003年

2 陸燕;讓與擔(dān)保制度之優(yōu)劣與構(gòu)建[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2006年

3 徐婧婧;物權(quán)法中引入讓與擔(dān)保制度的必要性[N];上海證券報(bào);2006年

4 趙紅肖;讓與擔(dān)保的性質(zhì)認(rèn)定[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2013年

5 張曉嫵 中國民生銀行貿(mào)易金融部;我國信用證進(jìn)口押匯業(yè)務(wù)法律問題探究[N];人民法院報(bào);2014年

6 上海證券交易所博士后工作站博士后 趙曉鈞;兩融業(yè)務(wù)要求跨越現(xiàn)有擔(dān)保法律體系障礙[N];上海證券報(bào);2011年

7 葉鋒 上海市金山區(qū)人民法院;流抵、通謀虛偽表示抑或讓與擔(dān)保[N];人民法院報(bào);2014年

8 中國銀行北京市分行 陳亮;債券回購中的擔(dān)保法律問題[N];證券時(shí)報(bào);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 李同波;論讓與擔(dān)保[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

2 周明文;讓與擔(dān)保制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

3 姜新文;論讓與擔(dān)保制度在我國的構(gòu)建[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2009年

4 趙晴;我國構(gòu)建讓與擔(dān)保制度若干問題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

5 唐蕓;讓與擔(dān)保法律問題研究[D];四川大學(xué);2006年

6 黃斌騰;我國讓與擔(dān)保立法探索[D];暨南大學(xué);2006年

7 危國文;讓與擔(dān)保制度研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2006年

8 路利梅;讓與擔(dān)保相關(guān)法律問題之探討[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

9 遲鐵;論我國讓與擔(dān)保制度的設(shè)立與完善[D];延邊大學(xué);2007年

10 鄧昭輝;讓與擔(dān)保制度的理論分析及其在我國的創(chuàng)設(shè)[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1844416