本文選題：被遺忘權(quán) + 個(gè)人信息保護(hù)��； 參考：《中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：數(shù)字技術(shù)的發(fā)展和互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的全球化使網(wǎng)絡(luò)逐漸從“默認(rèn)的遺忘”走向“默認(rèn)的記憶”,web2.0和大數(shù)據(jù)處理使個(gè)人的隱私信息處于一種不安的狀況,給個(gè)人的名譽(yù)和隱私生活帶來(lái)了不可預(yù)料的負(fù)面影響�！氨贿z忘權(quán)”作為大數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)代個(gè)體加強(qiáng)對(duì)個(gè)人信息控制的權(quán)利,為個(gè)人信息的保護(hù)提供了一種新的法律對(duì)策�！氨贿z忘權(quán)”是以個(gè)人信息權(quán)為基礎(chǔ),體現(xiàn)了對(duì)個(gè)人隱私權(quán)和名譽(yù)權(quán)的保護(hù),是在線(xiàn)環(huán)境下“刪除權(quán)”的延伸。但是在權(quán)利行使時(shí)還應(yīng)考慮具體的情形來(lái)平衡它與言論自由、公眾知情權(quán)等權(quán)利的沖突。我國(guó)在新時(shí)期個(gè)人信息保護(hù)立法中應(yīng)當(dāng)結(jié)合目前信息產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展?fàn)顩r和隱私保護(hù)文化,適當(dāng)引入“被遺忘權(quán)”。本文主要分為四部分:第一部分介紹了大數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)代數(shù)據(jù)主體對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)失去控制給傳統(tǒng)個(gè)人信息保護(hù)帶來(lái)的新問(wèn)題和挑戰(zhàn),“被遺忘權(quán)”的提出是在信息權(quán)差別懸殊的用戶(hù)和互聯(lián)網(wǎng)公司之間信息權(quán)利的一種平衡;第二部分主要以歐盟“被遺忘權(quán)”立法例為研究對(duì)象,對(duì)歐盟1995年數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)指令、2012年《一般數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)改革》草案以及議會(huì)通過(guò)的修改文本中關(guān)于被遺忘權(quán)的法律規(guī)定進(jìn)行分析,歐盟“被遺忘權(quán)”法規(guī)基本規(guī)定了權(quán)利行使的內(nèi)容但還需要更細(xì)致的規(guī)范來(lái)協(xié)調(diào)各項(xiàng)權(quán)利之間的關(guān)系;第三部分介紹美國(guó)對(duì)“被遺忘權(quán)”的認(rèn)識(shí)評(píng)價(jià)和相關(guān)立法,從中總結(jié)歐美對(duì)隱私保護(hù)和言論自由的不同做法;第四部分在文章前三部分的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合我國(guó)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀和個(gè)人信息保護(hù)的法律狀況,從歐盟和美國(guó)不同的隱私保護(hù)政策中總結(jié)對(duì)我國(guó)個(gè)人信息保護(hù)和網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息安全立法具有價(jià)值的對(duì)策建議。本文在外文文獻(xiàn)的基礎(chǔ)上較為全面的描述了“被遺忘權(quán)”的法律保護(hù),總結(jié)了國(guó)外學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)“被遺忘權(quán)”的討論焦點(diǎn)和關(guān)鍵問(wèn)題,并跟進(jìn)了“被遺忘權(quán)”在歐盟法律保護(hù)最新動(dòng)態(tài)和進(jìn)展,這是本文寫(xiě)作的創(chuàng)新之處。
[Abstract]:With the development of digital technology and the globalization of the Internet, the network has gradually moved from "default forgetting" to "default memory". Web 2.0 and big data's handling of personal privacy information is in a state of unease. It has an unpredictable negative impact on one's reputation and privacy. The right to be forgotten, as an individual's right to strengthen the control of personal information in big data's time, provides a new legal countermeasure for the protection of personal information. The right to be forgotten is based on the right to personal information, embodies the protection of personal privacy and reputation, and is an extension of the right to delete in the online environment. But when exercising the right, we should consider the specific situation to balance it with the right to freedom of speech, public right to know and so on. In the legislation of personal information protection in the new period, we should introduce the right to be forgotten in the light of the current situation of information industry and the culture of privacy protection. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part introduces the new problems and challenges to the traditional personal information protection brought by the data subject losing control over the data in big data era. The "right to be forgotten" is a balance of information rights between users with wide differences in information rights and Internet companies. The second part focuses on the legislation of the "right to be forgotten" in the European Union. An analysis of the European Union's 1995 data Protection Directive, the 2012 draft of the General data Protection Reform and the legislative provisions on the right to be forgotten in the revised text adopted by Parliament, The "right to be forgotten" in the European Union basically stipulates the content of the exercise of the right, but it also needs more detailed norms to coordinate the relationship between the rights. The third part introduces the United States' understanding of the "right to be forgotten" and the relevant legislation. The fourth part is based on the first three parts of the article, combined with the current situation of Internet development and the legal status of personal information protection in China. From the different privacy protection policies of EU and USA, this paper summarizes the countermeasures and suggestions that are valuable to the legislation of personal information protection and network information security in China. Based on the foreign literature, this paper describes the legal protection of the "right to be forgotten", and summarizes the focus and key issues of the discussion of "the right to be forgotten" in foreign academic circles. It also follows up the latest developments and developments of the right to be forgotten in EU law, which is the innovation of this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 鄭遠(yuǎn)民;李志春;;被遺忘權(quán)的概念分析[J];長(zhǎng)春師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2015年01期

2 陳昶屹;;“被遺忘權(quán)”背后的歐美法律“暗戰(zhàn)”[J];法庭內(nèi)外;2014年11期

3 彭支援;;被遺忘權(quán)初探[J];中北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年01期

4 何治樂(lè);黃道麗;;大數(shù)據(jù)環(huán)境下我國(guó)被遺忘權(quán)之立法構(gòu)建——?dú)W盟《一般數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)條例》被遺忘權(quán)之借鑒[J];網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全技術(shù)與應(yīng)用;2014年05期

5 鄭文明;;個(gè)人信息保護(hù)與數(shù)字遺忘權(quán)[J];新聞與傳播研究;2014年05期

6 吳飛;;名詞定義試擬:被遺忘權(quán)(Right to Be Forgotten)[J];新聞與傳播研究;2014年07期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李璐璇紫;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)時(shí)代的數(shù)字遺忘權(quán)[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2014年

2 羅瀏虎;歐盟個(gè)人資料保護(hù)改革研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1807394