本文選題：商標(biāo)法 + 法定賠償制度　； 參考：《天津師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：法定賠償制度是商標(biāo)權(quán)侵權(quán)損害賠償中一項獨立而重要的制度,自其產(chǎn)生之初就一直扮演著重要的角色,由于商標(biāo)侵權(quán)不同于普通民事侵權(quán),普通民事侵權(quán)中對侵權(quán)造成的損害是容易計算的,但是在商標(biāo)侵權(quán)中,受到侵害的客體是信息產(chǎn)權(quán),這就決定了商標(biāo)侵權(quán)具有取證難、損失難以證明的特征。權(quán)利人難以舉證證明自己所受損失的具體數(shù)額,法官也就難以判定侵權(quán)人的賠償數(shù)額,長此以往,不僅權(quán)利人的利益難以得到保護,也造成人民法院訴訟資源的浪費,在這種情況下,法定賠償制度的設(shè)計解決了這一難題,在侵權(quán)損失難以計算時,人民法院可以運用法定賠償推算權(quán)利人的經(jīng)濟損失。盡管法定賠償在商標(biāo)侵權(quán)損害賠償中地位特殊,但還是無法掩蓋其一直以來存在的問題,法定賠償因其使用泛化、賠償數(shù)額低、法官自由裁量權(quán)過大而廣受批判,究其根本,主要根源于我國法定賠償制度起步晚、發(fā)展快,立法尚不成熟。 本文結(jié)合理論和司法實踐對我國《商標(biāo)法》中定賠償制度存在的問題進行了分析,并提出了三方面的完善建議。本文第一部分主要論述了我國法定賠償參考因素立法規(guī)定不完善而導(dǎo)致的司法實踐中的具體問題,并提出了自己的完善建議；本文第二部分主要結(jié)合我國法定賠償計量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的理論研究現(xiàn)狀和國外立法經(jīng)驗,提出我國應(yīng)當(dāng)建立以權(quán)利客體為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的法定賠償計量單位；本文最后一部分針對我國當(dāng)事人適用法定賠償?shù)木唧w適用時間、適用順序提出了完善建議。
[Abstract]:The legal compensation system is an independent and important system in the compensation for trademark infringement damage. It has been playing an important role since the beginning of its emergence, because trademark infringement is different from ordinary civil tort. The damage caused by the common civil tort is easy to calculate, but in the trademark infringement, the object being infringed is the information property right, which determines that the trademark infringement is difficult to obtain evidence and the loss is difficult to prove. It is difficult for the obligee to prove the specific amount of the loss, the judge will find it difficult to determine the amount of compensation of the infringer. In the long run, not only the interests of the obligee cannot be protected, but also the litigation resources of the people's court will be wasted. In this case, the design of the legal compensation system solves this problem. When the tort loss is difficult to calculate, the people's court can use the legal compensation to calculate the economic loss of the obligee. Although the legal compensation has a special status in the trademark infringement damages, it still can not cover up its existing problems. The legal compensation has been criticized because of its extensive use, low compensation amount, and the judges' discretion is too large to be criticized. The main root is that the legal compensation system of our country starts late, develops quickly, and the legislation is not mature. Based on the theory and judicial practice, this paper analyzes the problems existing in the compensation system in Trademark Law of our country, and puts forward three suggestions to perfect it. The first part of this paper mainly discusses the specific problems in the judicial practice caused by the imperfect legislative provisions of the legal compensation reference factors in our country, and puts forward its own suggestions for perfection. The second part of this paper mainly combines the current situation of theoretical research and foreign legislative experience of the legal compensation measurement standard in China, and puts forward that our country should establish a statutory compensation measurement unit based on the object of right. In the last part of this paper, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to apply the legal compensation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.43

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 朱啟莉;我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法定賠償制度研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1805598