本文選題：“一帶一路”倡議　切入點(diǎn)：孟加拉合同法　出處：《貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)》2017年05期

【摘要】：隨著中資企業(yè)主動(dòng)融入國(guó)家"一帶一路"倡議,不斷增大對(duì)沿線國(guó)家的投資,在取得喜人成績(jī)的同時(shí),也遇到了一些問(wèn)題,特別是對(duì)沿線國(guó)家的法律不了解,影響了雙方的合作。熟悉了解各國(guó)相關(guān)法律,特別是與經(jīng)濟(jì)合作關(guān)系密切的合同法已成當(dāng)務(wù)之急。孟加拉作為沿線國(guó)家中重要一環(huán),是中資企業(yè)遭遇法律障礙較多的國(guó)家,有必要深入研究其合同法。由于高度移植印度合同法,孟加拉合同法在效力方面的規(guī)定有不少與大陸法系和英美法系合同立法原則不同之處,尤其是對(duì)于要約和承諾的生效原則、未成年人簽署合同的效力問(wèn)題,均有值得深入研究的實(shí)質(zhì)差異。同時(shí),對(duì)于條件合同和無(wú)效合同,孟加拉合同法雖然和我國(guó)一樣秉承意思自治原則為主導(dǎo),但對(duì)于所附條件的形式和實(shí)質(zhì)內(nèi)容以及合同無(wú)效之規(guī)定卻頗有迥異。
[Abstract]:With the initiative of Chinese enterprises to integrate into the national "Belt and Road" initiative, the investment in the countries along the route has been continuously increased. While they have achieved gratifying results, they have also encountered some problems, especially in the lack of understanding of the laws of the countries along the route.Affected the cooperation between the two sides.Familiarity with national laws, especially contract law, which is closely related to economic cooperation, has become a top priority.Bangladesh, as an important part of the countries along the route, is a country with many legal obstacles for Chinese enterprises. It is necessary to study its contract law in depth.Due to the highly transplanted Indian contract law, there are many differences between Bangladesh contract law and the civil law system and the common law system in terms of its validity, especially the effective principle of offer and acceptance.There are substantial differences in the effectiveness of the contract signed by minors.At the same time, the Bangladesh contract law is dominated by the principle of autonomy of will, but the form and substance of the attached conditions and the provisions of invalidity of the contract are quite different.
【作者單位】： 云南大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D935.4;DD913

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 劉建航　王峰;聯(lián)合探礦或合作勘查合同效力的認(rèn)定[N];中國(guó)礦業(yè)報(bào);2013年

2 本報(bào)記者 張維;24年儲(chǔ)蓄合同效力不容置疑[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉然然;濱海公司與新世紀(jì)公司房屋預(yù)售合同糾紛案評(píng)析[D];西南政法大學(xué);2016年

，

本文編號(hào)：1730061