本文選題：信息提供義務(wù)　切入點：調(diào)查義務(wù)　出處：《法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報)》2017年06期

【摘要】：拍賣人屬于居間商,對競買人的主要義務(wù)為信息提供義務(wù),在不能提供拍賣委托人的真實、具體身份信息時,須對買賣合同的履行負責(zé)。就拍賣標(biāo)的瑕疵而言,應(yīng)從是否屬于消費者買賣,拍賣人是否承擔(dān)出賣人義務(wù),瑕疵是否涉及違法性、安全性或按照合理商業(yè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)應(yīng)當(dāng)告知等方面出發(fā),確定拍賣人履行信息提供義務(wù)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。作為居間商的拍賣人須按照交易中必要的注意標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進行積極調(diào)查。拍賣場合的瑕疵擔(dān)保責(zé)任并非法定責(zé)任的保留地,而是違約救濟的組成部分。僅作為居間人的拍賣人不必擔(dān)保標(biāo)的無瑕疵,而承擔(dān)出賣人義務(wù)的拍賣人原則上應(yīng)擔(dān)保標(biāo)的無瑕疵,此時免除瑕疵擔(dān)保責(zé)任的格式條款可因違反《合同法》第40條無效;此類免責(zé)條款有效時,根據(jù)《民法總則》第132條,明知或應(yīng)知瑕疵的拍賣人對其援用也構(gòu)成濫用民事權(quán)利。拍賣人損害賠償責(zé)任的范圍根據(jù)其是否承擔(dān)出賣人義務(wù)而有所不同。對《買賣合同司法解釋》第33條但書,應(yīng)嚴(yán)格限定其適用范圍。
[Abstract]:The auctioneer belongs to the middleman and is responsible for the performance of the sale contract when he cannot provide the true and specific identity information of the auctioneer for the main obligation of the bidder.As far as the defects of the auction object are concerned, we should proceed from such aspects as whether they belong to consumer trading, whether the auctioneer undertakes the seller's obligations, whether the defects are illegal, safe or should be informed according to reasonable commercial standards, etc.Determine the criteria for the auctioneer to fulfil his obligation to provide information.The auctioneer as an intermediary shall conduct an active investigation in accordance with the necessary standards of care in the transaction.The imperfection guarantee liability in auction is not the reserve of legal liability, but the part of breach of contract relief.The auctioneer who is only an intermediary does not need to guarantee the subject matter without defect, but the auctioneer who undertakes the seller's obligation should, in principle, guarantee that the subject matter is without defects. At this time, the form clause of the exemption from the liability for the guarantee of defects may be invalid because of the violation of Article 40 of the contract Law;When such exemption clauses are in force, according to Article 132 of the General principles of Civil Law, the use of them by an auctioneer who knows or ought to know the defects also constitutes an abuse of civil rights.The scope of the auctioneer's liability for damages varies according to whether the auctioneer undertakes the seller's obligations.The proviso to Article 33 of the Judicial interpretation of the contract of Sale and purchase should be strictly limited in its scope of application.
【作者單位】： 中央財經(jīng)大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部人文社會科學(xué)研究青年基金項目(17YJC820054) 中央財經(jīng)大學(xué)青年教師發(fā)展基金項目(QJJ1531) 國家社科基金項目(16CFX055)
【分類號】：D923.6

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 范健;;德國居間商法律制度評析[J];中外法學(xué);1993年06期

2 王雷;;商事代理類似制度辨析[J];商業(yè)文化(下半月);2011年03期

3 王龍海;;論拍賣中拍賣人的保管義務(wù)[J];中國拍賣;2005年11期

4 于新循;;論代理商：法律上的嚴(yán)格判斷——以《深圳經(jīng)濟特區(qū)商事條例》為參照[J];重慶工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年03期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前3條

1 苗滋濱;拍賣人的瑕疵擔(dān)保義務(wù)[N];人民法院報;2004年

2 管曉峰;拍賣師低于保留價拍賣應(yīng)如何處理[N];檢察日報;2004年

3 實習(xí)生 周璐s，

本文編號：1715035