本文選題：隱私權　切入點：雇員　出處：《西南政法大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：由于電子郵件本身便利、迅速、廉價及可大量存取的特點。電子郵件成為現(xiàn)代社會生活不可或缺的溝通工具。在商業(yè)領域中,電子郵件更是成為企業(yè)雇主和雇員之間、企業(yè)雇員和雇員之間、雇員和客戶之間、雇主和客戶之間進行有效溝通的橋梁。但是電子郵件的廣泛使用也導致了相應法律問題�，F(xiàn)實中,有些企業(yè)出于自身利益的具體考量,通過各種公開或較為隱蔽的手段對雇員使用電子郵件的情形予以監(jiān)控。在企業(yè)中,基于雇主通常享有的強勢地位,其對雇員使用電子郵件的情形進行監(jiān)控不存在任何技術方面的問題。但是,企業(yè)在對雇員電子郵件的收發(fā)情形進行監(jiān)控的過程中,也可能會監(jiān)控到雇員的私人通信,雇員對這些私人郵件是有著隱私利益的,這就有侵害雇員隱私權之虞。因此,雇員在工作場所電子通訊方面的隱私利益的保護面臨嚴峻挑戰(zhàn)。關于雇員電子郵件隱私權的法律保護制度,美國和歐洲大陸法系國家各自發(fā)展了具有代表性的法律機制。但在我國,關于雇員電子郵件隱私權的保護相關立法尚不完善。所以,有必要加強對雇員電子郵件隱私權的法律保護。本文除引言和結語外,共分為四個部分。第一部分,概述雇員電子郵件隱私權。對可以作為雇員電子郵件隱私權保護基礎的理論進行比較和歸納,主要觀點有以下四種:第一,人格理論;第二,親密關系理論;第三,獨處權理論;第四,自我信息控制理論。然后對雇員電子郵件隱私權的概念進行界定,最后解構雇員電子郵件隱私權與雇主管理權的沖突。第二部分,從比較法角度介紹了美國和歐陸諸國保護雇員電子郵件隱私權益的立法情況。關于企業(yè)雇員隱私權進行保護的模式,歐美國家主要有如下兩種:一種是美國模式,另一種是歐洲國家的保護模式。本部分主要對歐美國家的相關立法進行了詳細介紹,并在此基礎上從立法理念、立法規(guī)范、保障范圍三個方面進行了比較分析。第三部分,立足于我國的隱私權立法和司法實踐,對我國有關雇員電子郵件隱私權保護的法律規(guī)定進行了梳理,在此基礎上反思了關于現(xiàn)行有關隱私保護規(guī)范的不足之處:第一,隱私權內涵不明確;第二,立法分散,內容不全;第三,權利配置不完善。第四部分,通過對國外立法經驗的介紹和對我國隱私權保護立法與司法實踐的分析,本部分提出了我國雇員電子郵件隱私權保護的制度設計。本文嘗試借鑒歐盟個人信息保護提出的基本原則,在現(xiàn)有法律框架下提出解決雇員電子郵件隱私權保護問題的方案,對企業(yè)自律機制的企業(yè)電子郵件政策的基本內容提出了相關建議。本文認為,在沒有立法明文規(guī)定保護雇員電子郵件隱私權的情況下,可以在司法實踐中引入“合理的隱私期待原則”,解決因保護雇員電子郵件隱私權所產生的保護范圍界定的難題。
[Abstract]:Because the e-mail itself is convenient, rapid, cheap and large access. Email has become an indispensable communication tool of modern social life. In the commercial domain, email is to become the enterprise between employers and employees, between employees and employees, between employees and customers, for the effective communication bridge between employers and clients. But widely used the e-mail has led to corresponding legal issues. In fact, the specific considerations for their own interests of some enterprises, through various public or more covert means to employees using electronic mail to monitor the situation. In the enterprise, employers often enjoys a strong position based on the monitoring of employees using email does not exist in any case the technical aspects of the problem. However, in the process of enterprise employees' e-mail monitoring situation in May To monitor the private communications of employees, employees have privacy interests of these private messages, which have infringed the right of employee privacy concerns. Therefore, the protection of employees in the workplace electronic communications privacy interests is facing serious challenges. The legal protection system of employee e-mail privacy, the United States and the European continental law countries the development of legal representative mechanism. But in our country, the protection of the relevant legislation about employees' e-mail privacy is still not perfect. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the legal protection of employees' e-mail privacy. Besides the introduction and conclusion, is divided into four parts. The first part, an overview of employee email privacy as an employee of right of privacy protection theory based email are compared and summarized, the main points are the following four types: first, theory of personality; second, close relationship theory; Third, alone right theory; fourth, self information control theory. Then the concept of employees'emails privacy definition, finally the deconstruction of conflicts of privacy and employer employee e-mail management right. The second part, from the perspective of comparative law introduces the legislation of the United States and European countries to protect the rights and interests of the employees' e-mail privacy on enterprise employee privacy. Right protection mode, Europe and the United States there are two main types: one is the American model, the other is a protection mode of European countries. This part mainly related to legislation in Europe and the United States is introduced in detail, and on this basis, from the legislative idea, legislative norms, the three aspects of the scope of protection are analyzed the third part, based on China's privacy legislation and judicial practice in our country on the protection of employees' e-mail privacy laws for carding, on this base On the basis of current reflect a lack of privacy protection standard points: first, the right of privacy content is not clear; second, decentralized legislation, incomplete content; third, the right configuration is not perfect. The fourth part, through the introduction of foreign legislative experience and analysis of the legislation and judicial practice of the right to privacy protection in our country, this part put forward the system design of the privacy protection of our employees' e-mail. This paper tries to learn the basic principles of the protection of personal information is proposed, under the existing legal framework to solve the problem of privacy protection of employees'emails case, the basic content of corporate e-mail policy on enterprise self-discipline mechanism were proposed. This paper argues that, in the absence of legislation expressly provided the protection of employee e-mail privacy case, the introduction of "reasonable expectation of privacy" principle in the judicial practice, because of the protection of employee power The problem of the definition of the scope of protection produced by the right of submail privacy.

【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前8條

1 王利明;;人格權法的發(fā)展與完善——以人格尊嚴的保護為視角[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2012年04期

2 張建文;羅瀏虎;;中韓網絡實名制之精神分野與網絡管理理念更新[J];重慶郵電大學學報(社會科學版);2012年03期

3 王利明;;隱私權概念的再界定[J];法學家;2012年01期

4 劉士國;;患者隱私權:自己決定權與個人信息控制權[J];社會科學;2011年06期

5 張建文;;基因隱私權的民法保護[J];河北法學;2010年06期

6 田野;;工作場所電子郵件監(jiān)視與雇員隱私權保護[J];北京科技大學學報(社會科學版);2008年01期

7 洪海林;;個人信息財產化及其法律規(guī)制研究[J];四川大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2006年05期

8 梅紹祖;個人信息保護的基礎性問題研究[J];蘇州大學學報;2005年02期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 吳俊潔;雇員電子郵件法律保護的比較研究[D];華東政法大學;2009年

，

本文編號：1682843